New RTX3xxx cards
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
Glad to help!
@Joe_H
Thanks for the clarification.
@Joe_H
Thanks for the clarification.
Last edited by Foxter on Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
The forum is not set to use attachments, posts can have image links to ones stored elsewhere. The link to that image would be posted within IMG tags.Foxter wrote:I would add the pictures here but I cannot find the add attachment button, maybe this is restricted because I am a new member?
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
Foxter, thanks for that any reason power limit set to 70% or is this the setting to keep the temps under 80C?
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .
Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
@kiore
This is mainly to keep the video card cool, the electric bill low (24/7 folding only video card that eats 250W instead of around 330W) and as a secondary reason, to prevent any errors/keep the card functional and folding for a very long time.
When you have 4 x 2080 TI, 2 x 2080 Super, 4 x 2060 Super, 2 x 2060 and 2x 1660 TI, 1 x 1660 Super and now 1 x 3090,folding 24/7, the resulting heat and the electric bill matter a lot.
The 2080 TI are set to 70% power limit (170-180W), the 2080 Super / 2060 Super / 2060 are set to minimum power limit (125W) and the 1660 TIs / 1660 Super are set to minimum power limit ( 70-80W).
Also the power limit set to 100% for RTX 3090 only provides a minor boost in PPD (the same happens to 2080 TI).
Amusing fact: the RTX 3090 card has 28% minimum power limit, however it will downclock to even 240Hz to keep within that power limit.
I am curious if the 3080 has the same behavior as the 2080 Super, it can work at 125W when set to minimum power limit.
This is mainly to keep the video card cool, the electric bill low (24/7 folding only video card that eats 250W instead of around 330W) and as a secondary reason, to prevent any errors/keep the card functional and folding for a very long time.
When you have 4 x 2080 TI, 2 x 2080 Super, 4 x 2060 Super, 2 x 2060 and 2x 1660 TI, 1 x 1660 Super and now 1 x 3090,folding 24/7, the resulting heat and the electric bill matter a lot.
The 2080 TI are set to 70% power limit (170-180W), the 2080 Super / 2060 Super / 2060 are set to minimum power limit (125W) and the 1660 TIs / 1660 Super are set to minimum power limit ( 70-80W).
Also the power limit set to 100% for RTX 3090 only provides a minor boost in PPD (the same happens to 2080 TI).
Amusing fact: the RTX 3090 card has 28% minimum power limit, however it will downclock to even 240Hz to keep within that power limit.
I am curious if the 3080 has the same behavior as the 2080 Super, it can work at 125W when set to minimum power limit.
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
6M PPD. And that's on 75% of power envelope (1935Mhz), and probably not the most efficient WUs for such a large shader count GPU yet...
Still a little ways off of the 9-10M PPD I estimated of the GPU.
Still a little ways off of the 9-10M PPD I estimated of the GPU.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
Maybe you expected 10M PPD because you thought FP32 performance would be doubled in RTX 30X0 - but there are other factors which reduce real performance.MeeLee wrote:6M PPD. And that's on 75% of power envelope (1935Mhz), and probably not the most efficient WUs for such a large shader count GPU yet...
Still a little ways off of the 9-10M PPD I estimated of the GPU.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
This Forum doesn't support native uploading of pictures. Instead you will need to host the picture on a third party site and then link them here either via URL or via the Img tag available in the Full Editor. Posting URLs are only allowed after a new member has passed certain restrictionsFoxter wrote:...I would add the pictures here but I cannot find the add attachment button, maybe this is restricted because I am a new member?...
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
I still think we haven't seen the 3090 unleash all it's fury.foldy wrote:Maybe you expected 10M PPD because you thought FP32 performance would be doubled in RTX 30X0 - but there are other factors which reduce real performance.MeeLee wrote:6M PPD. And that's on 75% of power envelope (1935Mhz), and probably not the most efficient WUs for such a large shader count GPU yet...
Still a little ways off of the 9-10M PPD I estimated of the GPU.
We haven't even seen the 3080's max performance numbers yet.
The day is still early..
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
It looks like the latest rev. of the 2080ti still beats the 3080 at folding: https://folding.lar.systems/folding_dat ... pd_overall
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 8:06 am
- Hardware configuration: MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
- Location: Germany
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
I think it is a little bit early to tell.
I guess the number of 3080s which are folding might be only a few and some of them will run at 250W.
My 2080Ti Rev. A gets 4.3 Mill average @200W.
The 5.1 Mil up there might be at full power and with moonshot projects, otherwise I'd be a little bit surprised about hat number.
I guess the number of 3080s which are folding might be only a few and some of them will run at 250W.
My 2080Ti Rev. A gets 4.3 Mill average @200W.
The 5.1 Mil up there might be at full power and with moonshot projects, otherwise I'd be a little bit surprised about hat number.
MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
You have more details here: https://folding.lar.systems/folding_dat ... _a_m_13448
I just installed one of those (second hand) this morning and she's only done 3 WUs so far (stock), so I don't really know, but it does seem feasible.
EDIT: Especially if you choose the COVID-19 category. I'm on Any Disease, and you may be, too?
I just installed one of those (second hand) this morning and she's only done 3 WUs so far (stock), so I don't really know, but it does seem feasible.
EDIT: Especially if you choose the COVID-19 category. I'm on Any Disease, and you may be, too?
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 8:06 am
- Hardware configuration: MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
- Location: Germany
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
I'm at COVID-19.
I just tried full power (366W) at proj 17305.
They say it should be 5.6 Mill - I get 5.3 Mill with my watercooled 2080Ti Rev A.
With 200W I get 4.8 Mill, means, full power is a waste of energy for me.
I just tried full power (366W) at proj 17305.
They say it should be 5.6 Mill - I get 5.3 Mill with my watercooled 2080Ti Rev A.
With 200W I get 4.8 Mill, means, full power is a waste of energy for me.
MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
This is stock, air cooled (closed case), on mine:
I'll put her under water next week. The bloc didn't make it on time.
I'll put her under water next week. The bloc didn't make it on time.
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 8:06 am
- Hardware configuration: MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
- Location: Germany
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
What says nvidia-smi in the command line?
MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
Re: New RTX3xxx cards
Code: Select all
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19041.508]
(c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\WINDOWS\system32>nvidia-smi
Fri Oct 09 12:55:24 2020
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 456.38 Driver Version: 456.38 CUDA Version: 11.1 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name TCC/WDDM | Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce RTX 208... WDDM | 00000000:65:00.0 On | N/A |
| 58% 69C P2 255W / 260W | 833MiB / 11264MiB | 94% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 1404 C+G Insufficient Permissions N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 6180 C ...ore_22.fah\FahCore_22.exe N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 7800 C+G Insufficient Permissions N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 8220 C+G Insufficient Permissions N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 8788 C+G ...nputApp\TextInputHost.exe N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 9364 C+G ...bbwe\Microsoft.Photos.exe N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 9664 C+G ...5n1h2txyewy\SearchApp.exe N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 10072 C+G ...artMenuExperienceHost.exe N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 11196 C+G ...b3d8bbwe\WinStore.App.exe N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 15276 C+G Insufficient Permissions N/A |
| 0 N/A N/A 17168 C+G ...me\Application\chrome.exe N/A |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
C:\WINDOWS\system32>