P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Hello,
I thought it might be a fun project to make a dedicated folding PC. I'm trying to spend as little money as possible. I was planning on using an old FM1 socket Lenovo motherboard with an AMD A6-3620 and a P106-90 mining card. I think it might be a decent platform for GPU folding, as it has integrated graphics if i plan to use used mining GPUs. I have a concern about the PCIe specifications though. I believe this motherboard only has a PCIe 2.0 16x slot, and I don't know if a P106-90 would be supported by the mobo or have enough bandwidth. Any information on that topic is appreciated.
I also had a second idea for later on if my original plan worked out. I could get a full ATX FM1 mobo (current one is mATX) as they are very cheap, and also buy a second P106-90 to put in a lower slot. I am especially concerned about PCIe bandwidth there, as it's going to have to be split between 2 slots, at 2.0 speeds. This may not be the most efficient strategy, but it does allow me to upgrade down the line, and I always thought a dual GPU system would be cool. I've heard that using Linux over Windows helps give you a bit extra room with the PCIe bandwidth for folding.
I know this mobo/CPU combo isn't ideal, but I just have it sitting around and would like to put it to good use. For all I know, it flat out won't work with a P106-90. What do you think of these ideas?
Thanks.
I thought it might be a fun project to make a dedicated folding PC. I'm trying to spend as little money as possible. I was planning on using an old FM1 socket Lenovo motherboard with an AMD A6-3620 and a P106-90 mining card. I think it might be a decent platform for GPU folding, as it has integrated graphics if i plan to use used mining GPUs. I have a concern about the PCIe specifications though. I believe this motherboard only has a PCIe 2.0 16x slot, and I don't know if a P106-90 would be supported by the mobo or have enough bandwidth. Any information on that topic is appreciated.
I also had a second idea for later on if my original plan worked out. I could get a full ATX FM1 mobo (current one is mATX) as they are very cheap, and also buy a second P106-90 to put in a lower slot. I am especially concerned about PCIe bandwidth there, as it's going to have to be split between 2 slots, at 2.0 speeds. This may not be the most efficient strategy, but it does allow me to upgrade down the line, and I always thought a dual GPU system would be cool. I've heard that using Linux over Windows helps give you a bit extra room with the PCIe bandwidth for folding.
I know this mobo/CPU combo isn't ideal, but I just have it sitting around and would like to put it to good use. For all I know, it flat out won't work with a P106-90. What do you think of these ideas?
Thanks.
Last edited by smmm on Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
If I had access to those parts, I'd certainly put them together and try it. It all sounds logical sound IN THEORY. Personally, I have not ordered any new equipment since the mining market collapsed and the P106-* came on the popular markets so maybe somebody with some actual facts and actual experience can respond.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Don't expect too much from a P106-90 ... it's similar to a GTX 1050 ...
You'll get better results with a P106-100 which is similar to a 1060.
Anyway, I think the minimum requirement in Windows is PCIe 4x ... Linux doesn't have this limitation.
You'll get better results with a P106-100 which is similar to a 1060.
Anyway, I think the minimum requirement in Windows is PCIe 4x ... Linux doesn't have this limitation.
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Definitely do this on Linux but as said, don't expect much in terms of ppd
single 1070
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
I ran a single 1650 on an old FM1 mobo (a75 chipset, PCI-E 2.0x16), A6-3650, and linux for a few weeks and it ran pretty well. Only a little slower than in a modern x570 4.0 slot, averaging 268k vs 306k PPD. So like 10%-15% slower. Didn't try two GPUs on that mobo.
5800X + 4090 + Win11 | 5600X+ 3070 + 3070 + 2060 + Ubuntu 20.04 | 5600X + 3080 Ti + 3060 Ti + Ubuntu 20.04
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Ok thanks for the information. I looked a prices for used P106-100s, and the ones I found were pretty expensive, around $120 at the cheapest at time of writing. By comparison, P106-90s are around $60. I think I'd want to just try it out at first with the cheapest option considering this is a bit of a weird PC configuration, and then maybe later on if it works out well I could upgrade to a P106-100 or get a second P106-90, which would equal the cost of a 100.
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
When you say the minimum requirement in Windows is PCIe 4x, does that include 4x 2.0, or just 4x 3.0?toTOW wrote:Don't expect too much from a P106-90 ... it's similar to a GTX 1050 ...
You'll get better results with a P106-100 which is similar to a 1060.
Anyway, I think the minimum requirement in Windows is PCIe 4x ... Linux doesn't have this limitation.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
It depends on GPU speed. For very slow GPUs pcie 4x 2.0 may be enough but for very fast GPUs you need pcie 8x 3.0 or else it bottlenecks on Windows.
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
... or you have to accept the fact that your system may be achieving less than optimum performance on big assignments. Certainly a bottlenecked device will be producing a reasonable (or unreasonable, in foldy's opinion ) set of FAH results which is still a lot greater than zero.
One P106-90 is certainly a good start for many assignments and if you then need to upgrade your M/B rather than some other performance change, so be it. I wouldn't push it to two P106-90's or a P106-100.
One P106-90 is certainly a good start for many assignments and if you then need to upgrade your M/B rather than some other performance change, so be it. I wouldn't push it to two P106-90's or a P106-100.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
By very fast, he means RTX generation ... I think that P106-90 are sufficiently slow to be happy on PCIe 2.0 4x ...
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Ok good to know. However, if toTOW says that a P106-90 is happy on PCIe 2.0 4x, can you elaborate on why you wouldn't do two P106-90s?bruce wrote:... or you have to accept the fact that your system may be achieving less than optimum performance on big assignments. Certainly a bottlenecked device will be producing a reasonable (or unreasonable, in foldy's opinion ) set of FAH results which is still a lot greater than zero.
One P106-90 is certainly a good start for many assignments and if you then need to upgrade your M/B rather than some other performance change, so be it. I wouldn't push it to two P106-90's or a P106-100.
For example, a potential FM1 motherboard upgrade I was looking at was a GIGABYTE GA-A75-UD4H FM1, which Gigabyte's specs page lists having a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot and a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot (in an x16 size). My thought process is that you'd have one P106-90 in the top slot, perfect with 2.0 x16, and then later on I could install another P106-90 in the 2.0 x8 slot, which has more bandwidth than toTOW's statement on 2.0 x4, so it would theoretically be just fine as well?
I don't know if the motherboard reduces bandwidth on the slots if you have two cards installed.
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Are the P106-90s good on PCIe 2.0 4x on Windows as well as Linux, or just Linux?toTOW wrote:By very fast, he means RTX generation ... I think that P106-90 are sufficiently slow to be happy on PCIe 2.0 4x ...
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Note that on some some - but not all - motherboards, some of the PCIe slots compete for bandwith with each other or with other connectors on the motherboard (like an M.2 slot); sometimes the slot is even completely disabled by the installation of a device in the competing connector. On this particular board (at least for board rev. 1.0), the x16 slot will go down to x8 bandwith if both PCIe slots are occupied. Sometimes you need to dive into the board's manual to find this out. In this case, the block diagram makes this clear:smmm wrote:For example, a potential FM1 motherboard upgrade I was looking at was a GIGABYTE GA-A75-UD4H FM1, which Gigabyte's specs page lists having a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot and a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot (in an x16 size). My thought process is that you'd have one P106-90 in the top slot, perfect with 2.0 x16, and then later on I could install another P106-90 in the 2.0 x8 slot, which has more bandwidth than toTOW's statement on 2.0 x4, so it would theoretically be just fine as well?
So both your cards will get PCIe 2.0 x8 bandwith on this card.
Edit: Re: PCIe Slot Speed - x1 x2 x4 x8 x16
(My emphasis.)MeeLee wrote: In most cases:
(...)
PCIE 1.1 x16 / 2.0 x8 / 3.0 x4, good enough for GTX 1600 series GPUs under Linux (an RTX 2060 gets 975k PPD in Linux, which is slower than a Core 21 WU), or up to a GTX 1060 in Windows.
(...)
Online: GTX 1660 Super + occasional CPU folding in the cold.
Offline: Radeon HD 7770, GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC, RX580
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Ok awesome, that's very helpful. I had a feeling it would split up the bandwidth like that. However, in your quote (if I'm understanding correctly), a 2.0 x8 connection is good enough for a GTX 1060 in Windows, and the 1600 series in Linux. Therefore, since the P106-90 is about a 1050 equivalent, it would do just fine with 2 P106-90s on that motherboard in Windows since they're below a 1060, and still getting a 2.0 x8 connection each.
Side question, is there a folding performance benefit to using Linux over Windows, or does Linux just allow you to go below the minimum PCIe requirements of Windows?
Side question, is there a folding performance benefit to using Linux over Windows, or does Linux just allow you to go below the minimum PCIe requirements of Windows?
Re: P106-90 on old FM1 socket mobo
Both, but if you're not familiar with Linux, there's a learning-curve that may not seem worth the small differences.smmm wrote:is there a folding performance benefit to using Linux over Windows, or does Linux just allow you to go below the minimum PCIe requirements of Windows?
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.