Moderators: Site Moderators , FAHC Science Team
kiore
Posts: 921 Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA
Post
by kiore » Sun Sep 13, 2009 8:23 pm
Have a look at this! Initially thought my GTX260 was running very slow at 2300ppd but was actually over 23,000ppd at one point
13-14 sec per frame, very nice, didn't get time for a screen shot of fahmon but here's the log.
5766 run 5 clone 350 gen1134.
Code: Select all
9:51:49] Project: 5766 (Run 5, Clone 350, Gen 1134)
[19:51:49]
[19:51:49] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[19:51:49] Entering M.D.
[19:51:55] Working on Protein
[19:51:56] Client config found, loading data.
[19:51:56] Starting GUI Server
[19:52:09] Completed 1%
[19:52:23] Completed 2%
[19:52:36] Completed 3%
[19:52:49] Completed 4%
[19:53:03] Completed 5%
[19:53:16] Completed 6%
[19:53:30] Completed 7%
[19:53:43] Completed 8%
[19:53:57] Completed 9%
[19:54:10] Completed 10%
[19:54:24] Completed 11%
[19:54:37] Completed 12%
[19:54:50] Completed 13%
[19:55:04] Completed 14%
[19:55:17] Completed 15%
[19:55:31] Completed 16%
[19:55:44] Completed 17%
[19:55:58] Completed 18%
[19:56:11] Completed 19%
[19:56:25] Completed 20%
[19:56:38] Completed 21%
[19:56:51] Completed 22%
[19:57:05] Completed 23%
[19:57:18] Completed 24%
[19:57:32] Completed 25%
[19:57:45] Completed 26%
[19:57:59] Completed 27%
[19:58:12] Completed 28%
[19:58:26] Completed 29%
[19:58:39] Completed 30%
[19:58:52] Completed 31%
[19:59:06] Completed 32%
[19:59:19] Completed 33%
[19:59:33] Completed 34%
[19:59:46] Completed 35%
[20:00:00] Completed 36%
[20:00:13] Completed 37%
[20:00:27] Completed 38%
[20:00:40] Completed 39%
[20:00:53] Completed 40%
[20:01:07] Completed 41%
[20:01:20] Completed 42%
[20:01:34] Completed 43%
[20:01:47] Completed 44%
[20:02:01] Completed 45%
[20:02:14] Completed 46%
[20:02:28] Completed 47%
[20:02:41] Completed 48%
[20:02:54] Completed 49%
[20:03:08] Completed 50%
[20:03:21] Completed 51%
[20:03:35] Completed 52%
[20:03:48] Completed 53%
[20:04:02] Completed 54%
[20:04:15] Completed 55%
[20:04:29] Completed 56%
[20:04:42] Completed 57%
[20:04:56] Completed 58%
[20:05:09] Completed 59%
[20:05:22] Completed 60%
[20:05:36] Completed 61%
[20:05:49] Completed 62%
[20:06:03] Completed 63%
[20:06:16] Completed 64%
[20:06:30] Completed 65%
[20:06:43] Completed 66%
[20:06:57] Completed 67%
[20:07:10] Completed 68%
[20:07:23] Completed 69%
[20:07:37] Completed 70%
[20:07:50] Completed 71%
[20:08:04] Completed 72%
[20:08:17] Completed 73%
[20:08:31] Completed 74%
[20:08:44] Completed 75%
[20:08:58] Completed 76%
[20:09:11] Completed 77%
[20:09:24] Completed 78%
[20:09:38] Completed 79%
[20:09:51] Completed 80%
[20:10:05] Completed 81%
[20:10:18] Completed 82%
[20:10:32] Completed 83%
[20:10:45] Completed 84%
[20:10:59] Completed 85%
[20:11:12] Completed 86%
[20:11:25] Completed 87%
[20:11:39] Completed 88%
[20:11:52] Completed 89%
[20:12:06] Completed 90%
[20:12:19] Completed 91%
[20:12:33] Completed 92%
[20:12:47] Completed 93%
[20:13:01] Completed 94%
[20:13:15] Completed 95%
[20:13:28] Completed 96%
[20:13:42] Completed 97%
[20:13:55] Completed 98%
[20:14:08] Completed 99%
[20:14:22] Completed 100%
[20:14:22] Successful run
[20:14:22] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
more please.
kiore.
Last edited by
kiore on Sat Sep 19, 2009 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PennyPincherP
Posts: 15 Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: Corona, CA
Post
by PennyPincherP » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:12 pm
Might be null or dead end results.
Anglik666
Posts: 33 Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:35 pm
Post
by Anglik666 » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:22 pm
I want it
PC1: PII 940, 790GX-P, 4x2GB, HD 6870
PC2: P 9750, 790GX-P, 4x1GB, GTS 250
PC3: 2x O 2427, SM H8DII+-F, 4x2GB ECC
PC4: 2x X e5420, SM X8DLT-I, 6x1GB ECC
kiore
Posts: 921 Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA
Post
by kiore » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:27 pm
PennyPincherP wrote: Might be null or dead end results.
Yes that's why I've reported it here under 'issues', definately not 'normal' maybe something missing? Certainly well over double speed for these units. Reason for the smilies is I have had a few hardware problems recently and initially thought this was going to be more.
kiore.
hrlow2
Posts: 31 Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:06 am
Post
by hrlow2 » Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:51 pm
Burnin' up ,big time.
kiore
Posts: 921 Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA
Post
by kiore » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Umm I actually do now have another one
not quite as fast but still Fahmon reading 13863.23 ppd way above my normal 8714-8970ppd for these units.
Code: Select all
[16:21:29] Project: 5766 (Run 5, Clone 142, Gen 1063)
[16:21:29]
[16:21:29] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[16:21:29] Entering M.D.
[16:21:35] Working on Protein
[16:21:36] Client config found, loading data.
[16:21:36] Starting GUI Server
[16:22:11] Completed 1%
[16:22:46] Completed 2%
[16:23:22] Completed 3%
[16:23:57] Completed 4%
[16:24:32] Completed 5%
[16:25:08] Completed 6%
[16:25:43] Completed 7%
[16:26:18] Completed 8%
[16:26:53] Completed 9%
[16:27:29] Completed 10%
[16:28:04] Completed 11%
another 5766 unit, are these for real?? Anyone else getting them??
kiore.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349 Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Post
by toTOW » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:43 pm
I'd be curious to see how next generations fold ... that might some kind of bad WU that will lead to a) super slow units b) bad units that crash ...
Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
kiore
Posts: 921 Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA
Post
by kiore » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:03 pm
toTOW wrote: I'd be curious to see how next generations fold ... that might some kind of bad WU that will lead to a) super slow units b) bad units that crash ...
So are they science or missing something? Certainly produce some heat, this ones running at 89C while its same series 'friends' are only at 68C and 65C according to speedfan. The other 5766 I am running is at 8970ppd. But this one still reading 13,863 ppd now at 62% and 13 minutes to go.
Not complaining but concerned its faulty somehow.
kiore.
vvoelz
Pande Group Member
Posts: 552 Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Temple University, Philadelphia PA
Post
by vvoelz » Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:21 pm
I took a look at the WUs in question, and it looks like the number of steps in the simulation was corrupted somehow. Hence, I am KILLING this WU. (you'll still get credit, but no new WUs will go out). Thanks --Vince
kiore
Posts: 921 Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA
Post
by kiore » Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:26 pm
Happy to bring it to your attention, the points comp is fun but would rather do good science.
kiore.
kiore
Posts: 921 Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA
Post
by kiore » Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:59 pm
OK so here's yet another one!
Code: Select all
[21:31:14] Project: 5766 (Run 11, Clone 102, Gen 777)
[21:31:14]
[21:31:14] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[21:31:14] Entering M.D.
[21:31:21] Working on Protein
[21:31:21] Client config found, loading data.
[21:31:21] Starting GUI Server
[21:31:57] Completed 1%
[21:32:33] Completed 2%
[21:33:09] Completed 3%
[21:33:45] Completed 4%
[21:34:21] Completed 5%
[21:34:57] Completed 6%
[21:35:33] Completed 7%
[21:36:09] Completed 8%
[21:36:45] Completed 9%
[21:37:21] Completed 10%
[21:37:56] Completed 11%
[21:38:32] Completed 12%
[21:39:08] Completed 13%
[21:39:44] Completed 14%
[21:40:20] Completed 15%
[21:40:56] Completed 16%
[21:41:32] Completed 17%
[21:42:08] Completed 18%
[21:42:44] Completed 19%
[21:43:20] Completed 20%
[21:43:56] Completed 21%
[21:44:32] Completed 22%
[21:45:08] Completed 23%
[21:45:44] Completed 24%
[21:46:20] Completed 25%
[21:46:55] Completed 26%
[21:47:31] Completed 27%
[21:48:07] Completed 28%
[21:48:43] Completed 29%
[21:49:19] Completed 30%
[21:49:55] Completed 31%
[21:50:31] Completed 32%
[21:51:07] Completed 33%
[21:51:43] Completed 34%
13863.27 ppd all it's friends doing 8970 ppd not quite as impressive as the first one I got, but still seems suspiciously fast also a 5766 unit.
I am the only one getting these? Or just the only one noticing, unsure how many I haven't seen. They are also hotter than normal, this one 94C ouch!
kiore.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349 Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Post
by toTOW » Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:31 pm
I've never seen such WUs
Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.