Could this be a future for GPU Folding?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
doppler56
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:30 pm

Could this be a future for GPU Folding?

Post by doppler56 »

Ray tracing at 200X todays GPU performance:
http://www.techpowerup.com/87830/New_Co ... phics.html

Link within from the cards company:
http://www.caustic.com/company_press-releases.php

This maybe something to look into. The costs for such a card, has got to be out of this world. A few years down the
road the cost may make the card obtainable.
jaak ennuste
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:30 am
Hardware configuration: 3 x Nvidia Geforce GTX 295 cards (total 6 GPU's)
AMD Phenom x4 2600MHz Black Edition
MSI 790FX K9A2 Platinum system board, 4GB RAM
ATX case, 1000 W Chieftec PS
Windows XP 64-bit
More: http://estoniadonates.wordpress.com/
Location: Tallinn, Estonia, EU
Contact:

Re: Could this be a future for GPU Folding?

Post by jaak ennuste »

I believe, that this card is not increasing cards arithmetic FLOPS power, but uses much better algorithms for ray tracing and other graphics specific functions. Its just new quality in graphics ray tracing HW acceleration, compare to PHYSX acceleration. F@H uses GPU like multitude of simple CPU-s, not graphics functions like ray tracing etc.

So, my bet is that it is not the future of GPU folding.

Jaak
building 32 GPU folding rig: 16 x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 cards; dual PSU solution; 4 nodes.
Website: Estonia Donates, ambitious 400 PPD supercomputer project
Sponsored by AdlerFlow ceramic coated Porsche exhausts
Foxery
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:11 am
Hardware configuration: Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 (Intel P35 chipset)
Radeon 3850, 512MB model (Catalyst 8.10)
Windows XP, SP2
Location: Syracuse, NY

Re: Could this be a future for GPU Folding?

Post by Foxery »

This company built a whole new chip specifically for ray-tracing. It's not a programmable GPU like the ones we use for Folding or for gaming.
Core2 Quad/Q9300, Radeon 3850/512MB (WinXP SP2)
Post Reply