171.64.65.56 not responding

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

kasson
Pande Group Member
Posts: 1459
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by kasson »

I think NMJ may mean no more jobs--the server is a bit low on jobs at the moment. We're working on a couple things related to this server right now (hard to expand jobs immediately because some of the storage arrays are pretty full--we're trying to shift data around).
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by 314159 »

Thank you for the explanation.

I must commend you on the stablity of those servers assigned under your name Dr. Kasson.
I suspect that keeping them like this is a real p.i.t.a, - especially during the Holidays.
We all appreciate your dedication. THANK YOU!

John

P.S. I have had five new WUs assigned from this server since my post.
NMJ "may" not mean what we suspect - and also the blue has disappeared from the column in question. :)
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
kasson
Pande Group Member
Posts: 1459
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by kasson »

If it does indeed mean "no more jobs," this isn't a terminal condition. The AS keeps talking to the work servers to see how many jobs they have, and as work units come back in, more jobs become available. When I checked the server this morning, we were somewhat low, but this server typically gets a lot of WU returns. Thanks for your patience!
codysluder
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:43 pm

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by codysluder »

I think that one possible issue is that serverstat is a periodic snapshot of the server condition and that condition can change much more rapidly than the web page. A server that was out of jobs at one moment can be low on jobs (but not out) within a minute or so.

I'll second John's comment: Thanks for your attentiveness during the holidays, Kasson.
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by 314159 »

Hi codysluder,

I agree with your comment concerning the update of server condition(s).

In this case and all others, I survey the status over at least 3 update cycles before generating any posts.
Since most of my WUs are coming from "good old xx.56", I had watched this one for about two hours last evening - mostly out of curiosity, since I continued to successfully send and receive WUs. :)

It went into reject first (for about an hour), re-activated, and in the update following the re-activation, "blued out" the NMJ data column.

My current suspicion, on which I stand ready to be corrected, is that the blue NMJ column is automatically generated when the WU Available data remains in the bold black condition for some unknown period - perhaps with a reject condition variable thrown in for good measure. :e)

Fold on!

John
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by 314159 »

This server is in REJECT MODE once again. :shock:

Please help!

Thanks, :)

John
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
Cajun_Don
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:05 pm
Location: Cajun Country, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by Cajun_Don »

314159 wrote:This server is in REJECT MODE once again. :shock:

Please help!

Thanks, :)

John
Folding@Home server status
Report initiated on Sun Jan 4 20:30:21 PST 2009.

171.64.65.56 SMP vspg4 kasson full Reject 4.83 53 1 17883 2391 0 1.51 132 132 5856146 0 1 1 171.64.122.86 171.67.108.25

I have 2 WUs waiting to be uploaded.
Image

Have a great day.
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by VijayPande »

Should be resolved shortly.
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by 314159 »

Server is not pingable.
Looks overloaded but operational on current server stats page (the last time I looked).

All my Linux machines are being assigned to this server (and NO others) and I am getting nothing but "503's".

All completed WUs from this server are sitting queued.

Help!

Thanks!

John

Edit 0435 EST:
Several completed WUs have been sent to the "collection server".
Collection server has NO record of the WUs.
I am already facing excessive bandwidth issues with my ISP and this makes things considerably worse. :e( <-- "sad" not "mad" :ewink:
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
Mortlake
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:22 pm

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by Mortlake »

503's here as well , thankfully only one machine at the moment - 2.5 hours until the next Linux box completes .
Image
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by 314159 »

Hi Mortlake,

It's a pleasure to meet you! & also good to know that I am not the only one with this problem.
Thanks for the reassuring post!

Unfortunately, I have a quite large "farm" and most of the remaining dualies have xx.56 WUs completing within the next several hours. :(

Luckily, the 12 Quads are not having problems too! :)

Fold on and we'll wait for the good folks from the PG to wake up and fix things.
I guess that I'll just retire for some "beauty sleep" (I need it desperately) :)

John
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by toTOW »

Server is operational, but a bit overloaded with a netload of 150 ... :(
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
alexopth69
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:17 am

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by alexopth69 »

503 here too
314159
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:46 am
Location: http://www.teammacosx.org/

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by 314159 »

toTOW wrote:Server is operational, but a bit overloaded with a netload of 150 ... :(
It is now 0948 EST.
I have still not been able to send the completed WUs, nor have I been able to connect to another server for new work.

With all due respects, II do not call that "functional". :)

The netload has remained at 150 for the past 7 hours or so.

Someone modified the criteria for this server and it has created a real mess.

Please help!

John
John (from the central part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A.)

A friendly visitor to what hopefully will remain a friendly Forum.
With thanks to all of the dedicated volunteers on the staff here!!
Mortlake
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:22 pm

Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status

Post by Mortlake »

I managed to get some more work by stopping/starting the client , and getting routed to another server , but still cannot send the outstanding result , luckily my other machines seem to have missed the problem .
Image
Post Reply