171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Bobby-Uschi
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:26 pm
Hardware configuration: PC1//C2Q-Q9450,GA-X48-DS5-NinjaMini,GTX285,2x160GB Western Sata2,2x1GB Geil800,Tagan 800W;XP Pro SP3-32Bit;
PC2//C2Q-Q2600k.GB-P67UD4-Freezer 7Pro,GTX285Leadtek,260 GB Western Sata2,4x2GB GeilPC3,OCZ600W;Win7-64Bit;Siemens 22"
Location: Deutschland

171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by Bobby-Uschi »

1
23:59:10] Project: 5506 (Run 4, Clone 1, Gen 16)
[23:59:10] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[23:59:10] + Attempting to send results [August 6 23:59:10 UTC]
[23:59:11] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[23:59:11] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[23:59:11] (171.64.65.106:8080)
[23:59:11] + Retrying using alternative port
[23:59:13] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[23:59:13] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[23:59:13] (171.64.65.106:80)
[23:59:13] - Error: Could not transmit unit 02 (completed August 6) to work server.
[23:59:13] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
Thank You
PC1//C2Q-Q9450,GA-X48-DS5-,2xGTX285,2x160GB Western Sata2,2x1GB Geil800,Tagan 800W;XP Pro SP3-32Bit
PC2//C2Q-Q2600k.GB-P67UD4-Freezer 7Pro,GTX285Leadtek,260 GB WeSata2,4x2GB GeilPC3,OCZ600W;Win7-64Bit;Siemens 22"stern
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJEKT

Post by VijayPande »

Should be fixed now.
ei57
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:23 am

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJEKT

Post by ei57 »

VijayPande wrote:Should be fixed now.
Needs to befixed again!

171.64.65.106 vspg4v2 densign full Reject 1.33
ThunderRd
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:30 am
Location: Nong Khai, Thailand

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by ThunderRd »

Confirmed rejecting as of 0600 PDT. It has been that way for some hours now. I don't think anything will be done until Monday AM, though.
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by VijayPande »

It's up now. We're looking into why it's periodically going down.
ei57
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:23 am

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by ei57 »

VijayPande wrote:It's up now. We're looking into why it's periodically going down.
Thanks, just got my queue emtied - 6 WU's straight out.
ei57
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:23 am

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by ei57 »

Here we go again - reject
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by VijayPande »

It's up now.

We have new server code that should help this issue, but it's still in QA. We'll roll it out shortly.
MichaelO
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:59 pm

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by MichaelO »

This one is REJECT mode again and has been for quite some time today. I have 4 GPU WU's completed that cannot be sent back as the alternate server being tried as shown below is not even listed in the server list

Code: Select all

[04:35:59] Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 186, Gen 37)
[04:35:59] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[04:35:59] + Attempting to send results [August 17 04:35:59 UTC]
[04:36:01] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:01] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:01]     (171.64.65.106:8080)
[04:36:01] + Retrying using alternative port
[04:36:02] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:02] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:02]     (171.64.65.106:80)
[04:36:02] - Error: Could not transmit unit 06 (completed August 17) to work server.
[04:36:02] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[04:36:02] + Attempting to send results [August 17 04:36:02 UTC]
[04:36:02] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:02]   (Got status 503)
[04:36:02] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:02]     (171.64.122.76:8080)
[04:36:02] + Retrying using alternative port
[04:36:02] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:02] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:02]     (171.64.122.76:80)
[04:36:02]   Could not transmit unit 06 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[04:36:02] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[04:36:02] + Attempting to get work packet
[04:36:02] - Connecting to assignment server
[04:36:02] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.20).
[04:36:02] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[04:36:03] Loaded queue successfully.
[04:36:03] Project: 5506 (Run 0, Clone 186, Gen 37)
[04:36:03] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[04:36:03] + Attempting to send results [August 17 04:36:03 UTC]
[04:36:04] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:04] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:04]     (171.64.65.106:8080)
[04:36:04] + Retrying using alternative port
[04:36:06] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:06] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:06]     (171.64.65.106:80)
[04:36:06] - Error: Could not transmit unit 06 (completed August 17) to work server.
[04:36:06] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[04:36:06] + Attempting to send results [August 17 04:36:06 UTC]
[04:36:06] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:06]   (Got status 503)
[04:36:06] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:06]     (171.64.122.76:8080)
[04:36:06] + Retrying using alternative port
[04:36:06] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[04:36:06]   (Got status 503)
[04:36:06] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[04:36:06]     (171.64.122.76:80)
[04:36:06]   Could not transmit unit 06 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[04:36:06] + Closed connections
Image
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by VijayPande »

Thanks for the feedbackup. It's up now.
ei57
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:23 am

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by ei57 »

In reject again.
bollix47
Posts: 2963
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by bollix47 »

And collection server not collecting.

Code: Select all

--- Opening Log file [August 22 14:16:16 UTC] 


# Windows GPU Console Edition #################################################
###############################################################################

                       Folding@Home Client Version 6.20r1

                          http://folding.stanford.edu

###############################################################################
###############################################################################

Launch directory: C:\Users\Bollix\AppData\Roaming\Folding@home-gpu
Arguments: -verbosity 9 

[14:16:16] - Ask before connecting: No
[14:16:16] - User name: bollix47 (Team 39340)

Code: Select all

[14:16:16] + Attempting to send results [August 22 14:16:16 UTC]
[14:16:16] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[14:16:16] Core found.
[14:16:16] - Reading file work/wuresults_04.dat from core
[14:16:16] Working on queue slot 05 [August 22 14:16:16 UTC]
[14:16:16] + Working ...
[14:16:16]   (Read 1153898 bytes from disk)
[14:16:16] - Calling '.\FahCore_11.exe -dir work/ -suffix 05 -priority 96 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 2972 -version 620'

[14:16:16] Connecting to http://171.64.65.106:8080/
[14:16:16] 
[14:16:16] *------------------------------*
[14:16:16] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[14:16:16] Version 1.09 (Fri Aug 1 11:46:54 PDT 2008)
[14:16:16] 
[14:16:16] Compiler  : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 
[14:16:16] Build host: amoeba
[14:16:16] Board Type: Nvidia
[14:16:16] Core      : 
[14:16:16] Preparing to commence simulation
[14:16:16] - Looking at optimizations...
[14:16:16] - Files status OK
[14:16:16] - Expanded 43954 -> 244433 (decompressed 556.1 percent)
[14:16:16] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=43954 data_size=244433, decompressed_data_size=244433 diff=0
[14:16:16] - Digital signature verified
[14:16:16] 
[14:16:16] Project: 5006 (Run 7, Clone 21, Gen 114)
[14:16:16] 
[14:16:16] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[14:16:16] Entering M.D.
[14:16:17] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[14:16:17] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[14:16:17]     (171.64.65.106:8080)
[14:16:17] + Retrying using alternative port
[14:16:17] Connecting to http://171.64.65.106:80/
[14:16:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[14:16:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[14:16:18]     (171.64.65.106:80)
[14:16:18] - Error: Could not transmit unit 04 (completed August 22) to work server.
[14:16:18] - 4 failed uploads of this unit.


[14:16:18] + Attempting to send results [August 22 14:16:18 UTC]
[14:16:18] - Reading file work/wuresults_04.dat from core
[14:16:18]   (Read 1153898 bytes from disk)
[14:16:18] Connecting to http://171.64.122.76:8080/
[14:16:19] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[14:16:19]   (Got status 503)
[14:16:19] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[14:16:19]     (171.64.122.76:8080)
[14:16:19] + Retrying using alternative port
[14:16:19] Connecting to http://171.64.122.76:80/
[14:16:19] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[14:16:19]   (Got status 503)
[14:16:19] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[14:16:19]     (171.64.122.76:80)
[14:16:19]   Could not transmit unit 04 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[14:16:19] + Sent 0 of 1 completed units to the server
[14:16:19] - Autosend completed
Image
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by VijayPande »

Fixed now. We have code that should do this automatically when it looks like it's in REJECT, but apparently that's not kicking in. We'll look into why.
ei57
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:23 am

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by ei57 »

Needs fixing again.
DanEnsign
Pande Group Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:41 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: 171.64.65.106 in REJECT

Post by DanEnsign »

I've restarted the server. Thanks for the notification.

Dan
Post Reply