13429 low ppd on fiji XT
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
13429 low ppd on fiji XT
Of the two 13429 wu that I witnessed running on my Fury Nano, both have been ~1/6th of its normal ppd. Current TPF ~1min04s, est ppd 127k. Normally in the 600k-800K range.
rx470 in the same comp, doing another 13429 at ~215k ppd.
Looking it up it seems to have a really low atom count, which seems odd that a fiji xt would get such a low count? If these are going to persist for a while, I can swap it out for another 470.
rx470 in the same comp, doing another 13429 at ~215k ppd.
Looking it up it seems to have a really low atom count, which seems odd that a fiji xt would get such a low count? If these are going to persist for a while, I can swap it out for another 470.
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
Is the Radeon RX 470 device 0x1002:0x67c0 or device 0x1002:0x67df?
Both appear to have 2048 cores and are currently classified as FAH GPUSpecies 5.
The fiji xt is device 0x1002:0x7300 and has 4096 shading units. It is also classified as FAH GPUSpecies 5 so as far as I can tell both should receive assignments from the same pool of projects.
A project is currently under way to benchmark and reclassify all GPUs with more appropriated GPUSpecies. There's no ETA as to when that project will be rolled out to the servers.
Both appear to have 2048 cores and are currently classified as FAH GPUSpecies 5.
The fiji xt is device 0x1002:0x7300 and has 4096 shading units. It is also classified as FAH GPUSpecies 5 so as far as I can tell both should receive assignments from the same pool of projects.
A project is currently under way to benchmark and reclassify all GPUs with more appropriated GPUSpecies. There's no ETA as to when that project will be rolled out to the servers.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
FYI, Project 13429 had its base point adjusted since there was a mistake. Thus, see what your system performs with the new base points
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:50 pm
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
Please remove the high end AMD cards from this project!
Vega Frontier Edition LC bringing barely 300k PPD instead of 1.3M PPD and Radeon VII 260k instead of 1.6-1.8M.
It's just a waste of electricity!
Edit: barely better with the adjusted credits... 350k for the Vega FE LC... still 250k for the R VII.
And there is definitively something wrong with the project on the big AMDs: the R VII sees utilization of 96%, but the GPU is not going up in speed (staying at 1.3 MHz) and drawing 40W...
Vega Frontier Edition LC bringing barely 300k PPD instead of 1.3M PPD and Radeon VII 260k instead of 1.6-1.8M.
It's just a waste of electricity!
Edit: barely better with the adjusted credits... 350k for the Vega FE LC... still 250k for the R VII.
And there is definitively something wrong with the project on the big AMDs: the R VII sees utilization of 96%, but the GPU is not going up in speed (staying at 1.3 MHz) and drawing 40W...
Last edited by NormalDiffusion on Mon Nov 09, 2020 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
I had a very well timed WU completion to let me swap out the nano for another 470, so I just did that for now.
GPU useage is ~50% power compared to higher atom count WU, ppd seems to be in that drop as well for the 470s (with new base points)
I'm fine with doing these low ppd high priority wu on the 470s, it just seems like a waste to do them on the nano - or it seems any amd gpu higher than polaris.
GPU useage is ~50% power compared to higher atom count WU, ppd seems to be in that drop as well for the 470s (with new base points)
I'm fine with doing these low ppd high priority wu on the 470s, it just seems like a waste to do them on the nano - or it seems any amd gpu higher than polaris.
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
I am having the same issue on my Radeon VII's. There is definitely a major issue with this wu and some AMD gpus.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:50 pm
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
Following the announcement from JohnChodera, "13429 is the ligand in solvent, and restricted to narrow GPUs".
The Fiji xt, R VII, Vega Fe... are by no means "narrow GPUs" and shouldn't be part of 13429 but 13428.
The Fiji xt, R VII, Vega Fe... are by no means "narrow GPUs" and shouldn't be part of 13429 but 13428.
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D, 3900x
7900xtx, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
None of the AMD GPUs should be getting those. It has been mis-configured most likely
FAH Omega tester
-
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: ASRock X370M PRO4
Ryzen 2400G APU
16 GB DDR4-3200
MSI GTX 1660 Super Gaming X
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
They run fine on the onboard Vega 11, with PPD return 50% or more above average. There did seem to be some variance in PPD return/TPF. I ran three in a row and all varied.
Fold them if you get them!
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
In the past, there has always been variations between Run M and Run N within project P. The moonshot sprint evaluates/screens a variety of proposed compounds. They're divided into two groups, one of which tends to work well on GPUs with a multitude of shaders and the other of which works better on narrow GPUs (with low shader counts). Fitting every compound into those two categories is a challenge, but FAH can't really afford to assign a different project number to every compound.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:50 pm
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
And now the Radeon VII, Vega are getting them again... <400k PPD...muziqaz wrote:None of the AMD GPUs should be getting those. It has been mis-configured most likely
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D, 3900x
7900xtx, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
Someone opened the floodgates so all the GPUs are getting that project
FAH Omega tester
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:50 pm
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
Instead of assigning 13428 to those AMD cards...muziqaz wrote:Someone opened the floodgates so all the GPUs are getting that project
Funny that no "fast" Nvidia GPU get those 13429...
-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: 7950x3D, 5950x, 5800x3D, 3900x
7900xtx, Radeon 7, 5700xt, 6900xt, RX 550 640SP - Location: London
- Contact:
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
When I said all the GPUs, I meant even fast nVidia 13428s have been probably finished, so we are getting some leftovers 13429s
FAH Omega tester
Re: 13429 low ppd on fiji XT
I was fine with doing them on my 470's, which I still have both in that system. My guess is there are not enough low CU gpus available for the amount of WU that need completion?