It was this wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercomputer
Thank goodness for the history, I went back to check it and saw it was changed. Thought I was going crazy.
Search found 18 matches
- Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:04 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Is folding based on BOINC? [No. FAH came first.]
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2950
- Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:18 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Is folding based on BOINC? [No. FAH came first.]
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2950
Is folding based on BOINC? [No. FAH came first.]
I thought folding was not compatible with BOINC. On the website it says they stopped development on it 2006.
In the wiki on super computing, it says Folding is based on BOINC.
Just curious.
In the wiki on super computing, it says Folding is based on BOINC.
Just curious.
- Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:18 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Any official Stanford/Pande group info kit material?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 620
Re: Any official Stanford/Pande group info kit material?
That's great!
I will use it.
Just a note, their is an orphaned header question at the bottom of one page. Question on one page, answer on the next.
Thanks!
More computers shall be borged.
I will use it.
Just a note, their is an orphaned header question at the bottom of one page. Question on one page, answer on the next.
Thanks!
More computers shall be borged.
- Fri Jan 02, 2009 3:36 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Any official Stanford/Pande group info kit material?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 620
Any official Stanford/Pande group info kit material?
Is there anything, like a one pager PDF I can print off to show to either or both management and IT type people that I don't want install a voracious computer gobbling virus on thier systems? I am making proposals to two organizations I am involved with, one of them is very large, to create folding ...
- Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:35 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Resistance...to FAH
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5497
Re: Resistance...to FAH
Well, I have to say I did hear possibly the stupidest and most bewildering thing anyone has ever said to me... which went....
"I have a my own views on cancer so there is no way I would ever do that."
If someone can translate that, I will buy them a significant amount of beer.
"I have a my own views on cancer so there is no way I would ever do that."
If someone can translate that, I will buy them a significant amount of beer.
- Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:26 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Resistance...to FAH
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5497
Resistance...to FAH
I may not be the most persuasive guy, but I find telling people about FAH I am met with astonishing resistance.
Often people think I am a complete idiot for bothering.
Does anyone else encounter that kind of thing?
Often people think I am a complete idiot for bothering.
Does anyone else encounter that kind of thing?
- Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:00 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Please help me get Microsoft bring folding to the Xbox 360!
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4079
Re: Please help me get Microsoft bring folding to the Xbox 360!
but honestly, the 360 would after 24 hours start acting as a barbeque XD Upside, cook your poultry, Downside, no 360 :( Get a PS3, Bill Gates is too obsessed with his money to be caring about F@F. PS3 FTW :D :D :D I try to use Open Source software so I am not a MS fanboy, but I really don't think t...
- Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:32 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Will F@H finish?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3326
Re: Will F@H finish?
Folding@Home has been around for a number of years now, and I was just starting to wonder, is this project something that can be completed, or will it be ongoing for the rest of the foreseeable future? If this project has a finish line, how close are we to reaching it? I may be talking out the wron...
- Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:30 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: How long would a project take.... say 2653
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2371
- Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:07 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: How long would a project take.... say 2653
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2371
- Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:26 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: How long would a project take.... say 2653
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2371
How long would a project take.... say 2653
2653 seems to be talked about a lot on the forums. I guess it is a big SMP WU. I am curious to know in general terms for a project like that, how long would it take without FAH? If Dr. Pande and collegues were scratching about the basement of a biology building with a small Best Buy budget for compu...
- Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:13 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Estimates of Dual Cores to Quad Cores
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9301
I am running the standard release client on my laptop. I tried the SMP and it wasn't working out. I have subsequently learned that there are graceful ways apparently to shut it down. I will keep track and look for an SMP release client. Till then it is churning away on whatever the standard client ...
- Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:20 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Estimates of Dual Cores to Quad Cores
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9301
I quit running the SMP on my lappie because it didn't like being turned off and on all the time. When I was at work and just left it on, it completed WU's just fine within deadlines. I like to look at it differently. You quit running the Beta client on your laptop because it didn't like being turne...
- Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:33 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Estimates of Dual Cores to Quad Cores
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9301
- Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:06 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Estimates of Dual Cores to Quad Cores
- Replies: 24
- Views: 9301
The above sentence says 'one FAHcore per CPU-Core' Does that mean one Client per CPU? If I have a quad core, which is effectively 2 dual cores.... is running the SMP client twice on a quad core what Dr Pande is asking us NOT to do? Or is he asking us not to run two clients accessing a single core.....