UPdate
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 1:32 am
So the surge of newbies, caused rationing of WU's; newbies to Wu's would graph over time, show quite well or easy to plot.
Where are we now, catching up, peaked, or back to normal? You would think the F@H's brass, would make a statement vividly. Shows donor respect! What happens is 2nd hand or 3rd hand, be patient continue spending, eventually it will get better!
Donors efforts are taken for granted, donors not complimented, & not mentioned in the footnotes on papers page.
Everyone who contributes to the "PAPERS" is acknowledged (including police dept's, animal control etc. who helped in the project), F@H mostly in its "PAPERS" does not acknowledge in the footnotes Donors.
Why because F@H's arrogance believes donors are expendable (screw him/her another will replace) attitude. Arrogance by the masters, that they depend on, that's F@H.
F@H's arrogance would have you believe, do to size they contribute more to science. Not TRUE! Results however you want to judge: "papers or adapted OR contributed to drug creation / by flops" Top dog flops, is not has great as they, portray to newbies folders. Or more/equal bang for your bucks.
Where are we now, catching up, peaked, or back to normal? You would think the F@H's brass, would make a statement vividly. Shows donor respect! What happens is 2nd hand or 3rd hand, be patient continue spending, eventually it will get better!
Donors efforts are taken for granted, donors not complimented, & not mentioned in the footnotes on papers page.
Everyone who contributes to the "PAPERS" is acknowledged (including police dept's, animal control etc. who helped in the project), F@H mostly in its "PAPERS" does not acknowledge in the footnotes Donors.
Why because F@H's arrogance believes donors are expendable (screw him/her another will replace) attitude. Arrogance by the masters, that they depend on, that's F@H.
F@H's arrogance would have you believe, do to size they contribute more to science. Not TRUE! Results however you want to judge: "papers or adapted OR contributed to drug creation / by flops" Top dog flops, is not has great as they, portray to newbies folders. Or more/equal bang for your bucks.