NVIDIA Quadro M520

[<NO_NAME>]

Is there any chance to add NVIDIA Quadro M520 to the list?

Here is output of "FAHClient.exe --lspci":

Code: Select all

VendorID:DeviceID:PCI Bus:PCI Slot:PCI function:Vendor Name:Description
0x8086:0x9d3a:0:22:0:Intel Corporation:Intel(R) Management Engine Interface
0x8086:0x156f:0:31:6:Intel Corporation:Intel(R) Ethernet Connection I219-LM
0x10de:0x137b:2:0:0:NVIDIA Corporation:NVIDIA Quadro M520
0x8086:0x9d10:0:28:0:Intel Corporation:Mobile 6th/7th Generation Intel(R) Processor Family I/O PCI Express Root Port #1 - 9D10
0x8086:0x9d18:0:29:0:Intel Corporation:Mobile 6th/7th Generation Intel(R) Processor Family I/O PCI Express Root Port #9 - 9D18
0x8086:0x1904:0:0:0:Intel Corporation:PCI standard host CPU bridge
0x8086:0x1911:0:8:0:Intel Corporation:Intel(R) Xeon(R) E3 - 1200/1500 v5/6th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) Gaussian Mixture Model - 1911
0x17aa:0x0004:64:0:0:Lenovo:Standard NVM Express Controller
0x8086:0x9d21:0:31:2:Intel Corporation:Mobile 6th/7th Generation Intel(R) Processor Family I/O PMC - 9D21
0x8086:0x1916:0:2:0:Intel Corporation:Intel(R) HD Graphics 520
0x8086:0x24f3:4:0:0:Intel Corporation:Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
0x8086:0x9d2f:0:20:0:Intel Corporation:USB xHCI Compliant Host Controller
0x8086:0x9d48:0:31:0:Intel Corporation:Mobile 6th/7th Generation Intel(R) Processor Family I/O LPC Controller (U Premium SKU) - 9D48
0x8086:0x9d1a:0:29:2:Intel Corporation:Mobile 6th/7th Generation Intel(R) Processor Family I/O PCI Express Root Port #11 - 9D1A
0x8086:0x9d23:0:31:4:Intel Corporation:Synaptics SMBus Driver
0x8086:0x9d16:0:28:6:Intel Corporation:Mobile 6th/7th Generation Intel(R) Processor Family I/O PCI Express Root Port #7 - 9D16
0x8086:0x9d3d:0:22:3:Intel Corporation:Intel(R) Active Management Technology - SOL
0x8086:0x9d31:0:20:2:Intel Corporation:Mobile 6th/7th Generation Intel(R) Processor Family I/O Thermal subsystem - 9D31
0x8086:0x9d70:0:31:3:Intel Corporation:High Definition Audio Controller

[bruce]

I've added it reluctantly. As a general rule, mobile chips have rather limited processing capabilities and people using them often come back and complain that their hardware is too weak to run FAH or that it produces too much heat.

In any case, please report back.

[<NO_NAME>]

Well, yes. It appears to be quite slow. It needs over 1 day to finish a single WU. Although, this WU has over 11,000 Base Credits so I guess it is quite big. In contrast, WU on my CPU has 360 Base Credits and it needs about 10 hours to complete. If I read it correctly, my GPU is much more efficient than my CPU.

Sadly, you wasn't right about the heat. It produces some but not nearly enough.
Honestly, I remembered that Folding@Home exists only because it is rather cold in my office and I was looking for some way to heat it up. FAH helps but only a little.

[Joe_H]

Sadly, you wasn't right about the heat. It produces some but not nearly enough.
Honestly, I remembers that Folding@Home exists only because it is rather cold in my office and I was looking for some way to heat it up. FAH helps but only a little.

Well, with a TDP of 25 W, that heat output is significant in a laptop with limits on how much heat it can disperse. Less significant when you are talking about a room. There a desktop GPU putting out 150-200 W starts making a difference.