Folding Forum

Would someone be so kind as to see if this WU was credited to casw1000?
Thank you.

Project: 2605 (Run 16, Clone 357, Gen 41)

09:13:31] Completed 500000 out of 500000 steps (100 percent)
[09:16:39] Unit 3 finished with 80 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[09:16:39] Updated performance fraction: 0.758668
[09:16:39] Sending work to server


[09:16:39] + Attempting to send results
[09:16:39] - Reading file work/wuresults_03.dat from core
[09:16:39] (Read 5511915 bytes from disk)
[09:16:39] Connecting to http://171.64.65.56:8080/
[09:20:27] Posted data.
[09:20:27] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~23 kB/s
[09:20:28] - Averaged speed for that direction ~34 kB/s
[09:20:28] + Results successfully sent
[09:20:28] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[09:20:28] + Number of Units Completed: 2

Has the client.cfg file been edited incorrectly?

Hi Anonymous (team 0),
Your WU (P2605 R16 C357 G41) was added to the stats database on 2008-04-19 02:59:04 for 1760 points of credit.

Edited? Don't. Updating the client configuration is properly done with the -config or -configonly switch. Otherwise, this is the problem you'll get.

Ooh... he'll be happy to hear that.
At least the mystery has been partially solved.

I know that he is not one to manually edit the client.cfg file, so the answer to the problem still remains to be found.

Thanks for the help.

Flathead74 wrote:...

I know that he is not one to manually edit the client.cfg file, so the answer to the problem still remains to be found.

It's like speeding, most everyone does, few admit to it. Regardless of the cause (editing, human error, bad sector on the hard drive, power outage) the result is the same. The friend needs to update the config.

Upon further investigation, it was admitted that manual editing had taken place.
Proper schooling has been applied.

Thanks for the help.

*I seems I didn't know what I thought I knew...