Page 14 of 15

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:53 pm
by s12a
Weekly update, last 6 months:
Image

Weekly update, PC/MAC stats only, last 6 months:
Image

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:30 pm
by WangFeiHong
For PC/MAC stats, the "combined" line is out of the graph

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:51 pm
by s12a
Weekly update, last 6 months:
Image

Weekly update, PC/MAC stats only, last 6 months:
Image

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:30 pm
by s12a
5 Petaflops surpassed!

Weekly update, last 6 months:
Image

Weekly update, PC/MAC stats only, last 6 months:
Image

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:24 am
by DanGe
From Prof. Pande's blog, Folding@home passes the 5 petaflop mark:
Based on our FLOP estimate (see http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/mai ... pe=osstats), Folding@home has passed the 5 petaflop mark recently. To put it in context, traditional supercomputers have just broken the 1 petaflop mark, and even that level of performance is very challenging to aggregate. The use of GPU's and Cell processors is has been key to this, and in fact the NVIDIA numbers alone have just passed 2 petaflops.

Thanks to all who have contributed and we look forward to the next major milestones to be crossed!
We are one powerful global supercomputer...
Congratulations to all for making this feat possible!

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:35 pm
by Leonardo
We are one powerful global supercomputer...
OK, my ego is now sufficiently massaged. I can quite work and go home for the weekend.

What, FIVE Petaflops? WOW!

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:04 pm
by Smirnoff
I remember back in the days I stuck an FPU in my Amiga 1200 and was amazed that it hit 1.3 megaflops processing power. 5 petaflops, now that would be something else entirely. I would need about 3.800.000.000 of those amigas running side by side to acheive it. :D

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:00 pm
by #64-Lux
GPU stats over time. It seems that at the end of February the project altered the way how the "actual teraflops from the software cores" is counted.

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:44 am
by kelliegang
Hasn't been very.. "Weekly" recently :)
Any updates?

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:33 pm
by s12a
Sorry for not posting updates often in the last few months.
I have kept track of teraflops changes though.

This is a chart of *native* teralops stats of about one year of tracking (since I started):
Image

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:22 pm
by MtM
s12a would you mind if I hosted those image? Won't do it now but I want to add some general information about the project to my page and the charts will make the userbase/archievements even more impressive ( as graphs always impress better then words ).

Keep up the good work, I enjoy looking at them!

I thought about writing a script which would automaticly genarete the charts on each update but it's sadly not allowed to use scripts to acces the cgi pages :(

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:09 pm
by s12a
No problem, use the images as you wish.

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:16 pm
by MtM
Thanks, if you still have them could you zip them and email them to me, it would make it easier then to go through 14pages and manually download them :oops:

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:34 pm
by s12a
I have made a zip files of the images I made, but keep in mind that they haven't been relased very regularly.
http://www.mediafire.com/?0yqyzmknnmk

Re: Highwater Mark

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:04 pm
by s12a
Hello,

As I've lost my motivation, I'm posting here my spreadsheet in hoping that somebody will continue my tracking work.
Please somebody continue this!

http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=500360