FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
PantherX
Thanks for the update to the benchmarks , totally agree about no point in gathering more for now.
So what is the long list of stress tests you use then?
I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?
Thanks for the update to the benchmarks , totally agree about no point in gathering more for now.
So what is the long list of stress tests you use then?
I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon [email protected], 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon [email protected], 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: [email protected], 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21 - Location: UK
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
You could tape over half the cooling fan slots to simulate animal hair/dust/other detritus that might realistically build up over time? … or put a cardboard box around the back of the case to simulate the tight spaces the kit might be squeezed into in an overcrowded home-office? … or randomly pull out the power lead to simulate spouse/kids wanting to plug in their stuff? … Realistic might vary dependant upon your circumstances …
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
I tested your version, but I'm seeing weird things on DHFR : it's not able to use 100% of my 1070, only 65% ... I can't explain why. GPU load is better on NAV with 95%.foldy wrote:FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
There's also a CUDA option in your build, but it doesn't work.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Riiight, something like a stress test which doesn't trigger 'power virus' restrictions along with error reporting is more what I was thinking of .Neil-B wrote:You could tape over half the cooling fan slots to simulate animal hair/dust/other detritus that might realistically build up over time? … or put a cardboard box around the back of the case to simulate the tight spaces the kit might be squeezed into in an overcrowded home-office? … or randomly pull out the power lead to simulate spouse/kids wanting to plug in their stuff? … Realistic might vary dependant upon your circumstances …
foldy
Only just noticed your FaHbench link! I'll try it now .
[update]Ok I've tried it now, at 1st I was getting very on/off GPU load, I then paused BOINC (but it had left a CPU core free for normal folding anyway, which works fine there) & I got a consistent GPU load, but it was only at 75-80%.
Here's a screenshot for ya. Main rig spec in sig. Btw, what mix of SP/DP did you go for? Or is that not chosen by the benchmark program?
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
This list of mine was last updated in 2016 since that was the last time I assembled by system. I haven't done any research into current stress test software... that might change next year if I decide to get myself a AMD Zen 3 + Nvidia 3000 Ti GPUsAssimilator1 wrote:...So what is the long list of stress tests you use then?
I was thinking of using OCCTs GPU stress test, but I wonder if it's artificially throttled as (IIRC) it's counted as a 'power virus'. As is furmark.
So I would like to know what is a realistic GPU stress test (as in not throttled, or drawing an unrealistic power load) with error reporting?
Catzilla Computer Benchmark: https://www.catzilla.com/download
Cinebench: https://www.maxon.net/en/support/downloads/
FurMark: https://geeks3d.com/furmark/downloads/
Heaven Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/heaven
IntelBurnTest: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/intelburntest/
Linpack Xtreme: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/linpack-xtreme/
MemTest86: https://www.memtest86.com/download.htm
Superposition Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/superposition
Tropics Benchmarks: https://benchmark.unigine.com/tropics
Valley Benchmark: https://benchmark.unigine.com/valley
stressapptest: https://github.com/stressapptest/stressapptest
Futuremark 3DMark 11: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/fu ... 3dmark-11/
MSI Kombustor: https://geeks3d.com/furmark/kombustor/downloads/
AIDA64 Extreme: https://www.aida64.com/downloads
Prime95: https://www.mersenne.org/download/
OCCT: https://www.ocbase.com/
I like stressing out CPU/GPU/RAM simultaneously as opposed to individual components. I also ensure that the ambient temperature is as high as possible... including using a heat as I like simulating the worst conditions my system would perform in. However, with what I have been reading about "automatic overclocking" I think in my next build, I will focus on maximum cooling and let the hardware do it's job as opposed to manually overclocking anything
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Thanks , some I'm familiar with, I use OCCT for CPU testing & it's better than P95, so I don't use that anymore.
Heaven doesn't have error reporting for the free version, so I don't know how you would know when an error occurs? (out right crashes aside).
Furmark is detected by the drivers as a 'power virus' (as is one other I can't remember the name of), and so power is throttled for that test, so I'm not sure how good a test that makes it.
Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know!
I remember when ATITool would automatically lower GPU clock speeds on finding an error, magic! (didn't that become Furmark?).
Agreed about CPU overclocking, my Ryzen 3600 is the 1st CPU I haven't manually overclocked in over 20 yrs!
Heaven doesn't have error reporting for the free version, so I don't know how you would know when an error occurs? (out right crashes aside).
Furmark is detected by the drivers as a 'power virus' (as is one other I can't remember the name of), and so power is throttled for that test, so I'm not sure how good a test that makes it.
Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know!
I remember when ATITool would automatically lower GPU clock speeds on finding an error, magic! (didn't that become Furmark?).
Agreed about CPU overclocking, my Ryzen 3600 is the 1st CPU I haven't manually overclocked in over 20 yrs!
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
I never bothered to do reporting... I tend to sit in front my screen while all this runs and make notes on paper with a pencil... talk about old schoolAssimilator1 wrote:...Are their any on your list which are GPU tests, do error testing+reporting & don't apply an 'unrealistic' load? Tall order I know! ...
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Lol, you sit & watch the screen for hours??
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon [email protected], 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon [email protected], 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: [email protected], 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21 - Location: UK
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Hours isn't really old school .. PantherX probably means days … although he is using a pencil not a slate
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
-
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:19 pm
- Location: Cambridge, UK
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
I thought it was a lump of chalk on the cave wall
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Nah... I have upgraded to markings in the sand Of course, if the wind blows, I have to start all over again
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:03 pm
- Hardware configuration: Lenovo IdeaPad Y580: Chipset Intel HM76 | Socket G2 | BIOS 2.07
Display: 15.6" | 1920x1080 | LG LP156WF1-TLC1 | TN LED | glossy
CPU: Intel Core i7-3610QM | 2.3-3.3 GHz | 6 MB L3 | 22 nm | TDP 45 W
iGPU: Intel HD Graphics 4000 (GT2) | 22 nm | 16 Unified Shaders: 1100 Mhz
dGPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M (GK107) | 28 nm:
- 384 Unified Shaders: 835@1215 MHz (45.5% OC)
- 2 GB GDDR5 128 bit: 1000@1250 (5000 effective) MHz (25% OC)
RAM: Patriot | 16 GB | DDR3 1600 MHz | 11-11-11-28-1 | Dual Channel
SSD 1: Crucial MX200 | mSATA | 250 GB | Micron 16 nm 128 Gb MLC NAND
SSD 2: Crucial MX500 | 2.5" | 2 TB | Micron 256 Gb 64L 3D TLC NAND
HDD: WD Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT | 2.5" | 750 GB | 7200 RPM | 16 MB
ODD: Samsung SN-506BB | 4 MB | BD-RE XL
WiFi: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2200
OS: Windows 10 Pro (x64) | ForceWare 425.31 WHQL
Cooler: Zalman ZM-NC2000 - Location: Poland
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Just for fun I've benchmarked my GeForce GTX 660M (retired from active FAH duty a few years ago)foldy wrote:FAHbench 2.3.2 for Windows build with OpenMM 7.4.1 Core_22 with mixed precision
https://www.file-upload.net/download-13 ... n.zip.html
So that should match the current FAH GPU core for Corona Virus work units.
Compute: OpenCL
Precision: mixed
WU: real
Atoms: 64614
Accuracy Check: Enabled
NaN Check: Disabled
Run lenght: 5 mins
Score: 4.52456
Scaled Score: 13.6536