Folding Forum

Next upload of data will be Sunday

foldinghomealone wrote:Next upload of data will be Sunday

I’ll give you an upload Saturday, though I think for my cards you almost have enough data points until something changes.

I made graphs of the average PPD per processor for other visual people. (they may clip on some monitors, click to open in a new window)

Please note that the GPU image links to the CPU image. It would be great if the link is fixed as I am keen to see the complete chart!

It is interesting to note that the average value of GPU is almost 10x that of CPU:
CPU Average: 79,283 PPD
GPU Average: 782,097 PPD

PantherX wrote:Please note that the GPU image links to the CPU image.

Thanks for point it out. Fixed!

NoMoreQuarantine wrote:I made graphs of the average PPD per processor for other visual people. (they may clip on some monitors, click to open in a new window)

Any chance you could ad the standard deviation? (if it's not too much work...)

You can add a Celeron / Atom N3060 on there for fun, at 2100 PPD
It won't make the deadline.

NormalDiffusion wrote:Any chance you could ad the standard deviation? (if it's not too much work...)

Believe it or not, I have been struggling with this because Google Query Language (which I used to process the data) does not have a standard deviation function... I could still do it, but I don't have time to figure it out right now. I hope you will accept this new project comparison tool as a substitute: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sq5n4/copy

First comment here, thanks for your work.
I uploaded data with the Google form and I hope I did it well enough to be usable.
It concerns two GTX 1060 3GB, two Xeon W3520 and one i5-3570K.

Uploaded a new file for you

NoMoreQuarantine wrote:

NormalDiffusion wrote:Any chance you could ad the standard deviation? (if it's not too much work...)

Believe it or not, I have been struggling with this because Google Query Language (which I used to process the data) does not have a standard deviation function... I could still do it, but I don't have time to figure it out right now. I hope you will accept this new project comparison tool as a substitute: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sq5n4/copy

you can try using an online variance estimate as (sum(X*X)/N) - avg(X)*avg(X)

Uploaded new set of HFM exports.

New data for:
GTX 1050
GTX 1060 3GB
GTX 1660 Ti
GTX 970
i5-3570K
i5-8400
i7-3770k
i7-6700HQ @7t
i7-7700
Quadro M2000
R3 1200 @3t
R7 3700X
R7 3800X @15T
RTX 2080 OC
RX 460
RX 570
RX 580
RX Vega 64
Xeon W3520

Thanks to:
absolut_zero3
almcdsmi
AOD_N3URAL
Kebast
NoMoreQuarantine
Severian_Burgundy
spongebob25

Kebast wrote:

foldinghomealone wrote:Next upload of data will be Sunday

I’ll give you an upload Saturday, though I think for my cards you almost have enough data points until something changes.

Totally agree, thank you for your uploads.

NormalDiffusion wrote:Question to the other R9 3900X owners: trying to figure out where the difference in ppd is coming from; do you have an amd or Nvidia gpu running along?
Thanks!

I have a RX 5700XT running on this processor running at 3500 MHz and cooled with a Noctua NH-D15. Other than folding all I am using this machine right now is surfing and watching some videos a couple hours per day.