Community driven support forum for Folding@home
https://foldingforum.org/
One of my computers that I know does NOT have the -advmethods option got a 4520 today. It is the 5.03 Windows GUI client and is also not set for big WUs. Should I be getting these WUs on this computer?uncle_fungus wrote:4519-4521 at the moment
From what I've heard, small and normal may both work but I'm not sure anybody really knows yet.GTron wrote:1) If using the Linux v6.02beta1 client, does this imply setting WU size to "small" or is defaulting to "normal" correct/preferred?
2) Or is the Linux v6.02beta1 client, without the -smp flag, not a "classic client" able to process these WUs?
Actually, my Linux v6.02beta1 clients, without the -smp flag, are happily folding some 4519 and 4520s now too!Tobit wrote:Neither will work as these bonus units aren't able to run on the SMP client. These projects require the Amber core which isn't available on the SMP and other non-classic clients. See this thread for the official announcement.GTron wrote:1) If using the Linux v6.02beta1 client, does this imply setting WU size to "small" or is defaulting to "normal" correct/preferred?
2) Or is the Linux v6.02beta1 client, without the -smp flag, not a "classic client" able to process these WUs?
Meanwhile, I woke up this morning to find two of my classic clients chewing on each their own 4519.
I think you'd be better off running SMP. My T9300 (2.5 GHz) does 880-925 PPD/Core. Vista 32-bit with VMware Server running the Linux clientsneakers55 wrote:I've got a WU that is running on AMBER.
What I'd love to get is more for DOUBLE GROMACS B. My T7800 gets HOT but I'm getting about 780 PPD per core!
Here's some more info.apd183 wrote:One of my computers that I know does NOT have the -advmethods option got a 4520 today. It is the 5.03 Windows GUI client and is also not set for big WUs. Should I be getting these WUs on this computer?uncle_fungus wrote:4519-4521 at the moment
Code: Select all
# Windows Graphical Edition ###################################################
###############################################################################
Folding@Home Client Version 5.03
http://folding.stanford.edu
###############################################################################
###############################################################################
Launch directory: C:\Program Files\Folding@Home
[19:42:27] - Ask before connecting: No
[19:42:27] - User name: apd183 (Team 682)
[19:42:27] - User ID not found locally
[19:42:27] + Requesting User ID from server
[19:42:31] - Machine ID: 1
[19:42:31]
[19:42:31] Work directory not found. Creating...
[19:42:31] Could not open work queue, generating new queue...
[19:42:34] Initialization complete
[19:42:34] + Benchmarking ...
Code: Select all
[18:05:42] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[18:05:42] + Attempting to get work packet
[18:05:42] - Connecting to assignment server
[18:05:43] - Successful: assigned to (169.230.26.30).
[18:05:43] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[18:05:43] Loaded queue successfully.
[18:05:45]
[18:05:45] + Processing work unit
[18:05:45] Core required: FahCore_82.exe
[18:05:45] Core found.
[18:05:45] Working on Unit 05 [May 3 18:05:45]
[18:05:45] + Working ...
[18:05:45]
[18:05:45] *------------------------------*
[18:05:45] Folding@Home PMD Core
[18:05:45] Version 1.03 (September 7, 2005)
[18:05:45]
[18:05:45] Preparing to commence simulation
[18:05:45] - Looking at optimizations...
[18:05:45] - Created dyn
[18:05:45] - Files status OK
[18:05:45] - Expanded 19825 -> 126414 (decompressed 637.6 percent)
[18:05:45]
[18:05:45] Project: 4520 (Run 42, Clone 96, Gen 1)
[18:05:45]
[18:05:45] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[18:05:45] Entering M.D.
[18:05:52] Protein: p4520_2CVR-16-10ns_minout
[18:05:52]
[18:05:52] Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0)
[18:20:46] Writing checkpoint files
[18:28:29] Writing local files
Code: Select all
Mon May 5 14:32:35 MDT 2008
1)
Index 3: folding now 51.3 X min speed; 9.67% complete
server: 169.230.26.30:8080; project: 4520, "p4520_2CVR-16-10ns_minout"
Folding: run 22, clone 66, generation 2; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 300
issue: Mon May 5 12:09:59 2008; begin: Mon May 5 12:09:58 2008
expect: Tue May 6 10:59:06 2008; due: Mon Jun 23 07:21:57 2008 (49 days)
2)
Index 4: folding now 40.6 X min speed; 7.67% complete
server: 169.230.26.30:8080; project: 4520, "p4520_2CVR-16-10ns_minout"
Folding: run 17, clone 66, generation 2; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 300
issue: Mon May 5 12:09:59 2008; begin: Mon May 5 12:09:58 2008
expect: Tue May 6 17:01:55 2008; due: Mon Jun 23 07:21:57 2008 (49 days)
3)
Index 7: folding now 59.9 X min speed; 11.7% complete
server: 169.230.26.30:8080; project: 4520, "p4520_2CVR-16-10ns_minout"
Folding: run 24, clone 66, generation 2; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 300
issue: Mon May 5 12:09:59 2008; begin: Mon May 5 12:09:58 2008
expect: Tue May 6 07:43:23 2008; due: Mon Jun 23 07:21:57 2008 (49 days)
4)
Index 3: folding now 44.5 X min speed; 8.67% complete
server: 169.230.26.30:8080; project: 4520, "p4520_2CVR-16-10ns_minout"
Folding: run 20, clone 66, generation 2; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 300
issue: Mon May 5 12:09:59 2008; begin: Mon May 5 12:09:58 2008
expect: Tue May 6 14:29:23 2008; due: Mon Jun 23 07:21:57 2008 (49 days)
Sorry folks, there were some problems with these. In the next few hours, I will be putting up three replacement WUs: p4525, p4526, and p4527. As before, see http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=4525 for point details.vvoelz wrote:Heads up for three new 'bonused' AMBER Core WUs coming onling in the next day or so:
p4522, p4523, and p4524. See http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=4522 for point details.
Once they projects appear on psummary, they'll automatically be added to fahinfo.orgJeff_Grant wrote:I see some Intels on fahinfo.org for 4521 and 4519. I have one 4521 on an older athlonxp 1500 that I threw up there as well. As everyone gets these units, can you add to the database?