Page 2 of 3

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:33 pm
by bruce
AFAIK both A1 and A2 (and A3) WUs count toward the 10 WU minimum and the 80% minimum for a passkey to qualify for bonuses. After you've qualified your passkey, you only get a bonus on projects which have a Kfactor value.

EDIT: Correction: The A1 WUs do NOT count toward the passkey qualification. You'll need 10 WUs that are either A2 or A3.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:34 pm
by weedacres
bruce wrote:Sorry, but the tool I have doesn't use team names. I need to know the UserName that you'd like information from, not the TeamNumber.
Ok, there are several names:
Felix_Pasqualli
Godzilla
Porky
Meema

Each of those with the exception of Meema are multiple smp and/or gpu clients, all with the same passkey.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:46 pm
by Macaholic
weedacres wrote:
bruce wrote:Sorry, but the tool I have doesn't use team names. I need to know the UserName that you'd like information from, not the TeamNumber.
Ok, there are several names:
Felix_Pasqualli
Godzilla
Porky
Meema

Each of those with the exception of Meema are multiple smp and/or gpu clients, all with the same passkey.
You just answered your own question. One donor should equal one passkey. Which donor name was the original passkey issued for?

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:57 pm
by weedacres
Well I got some bad advice then.
The passkey is tied to the team name.
At this point I have 15 clients on 6 physical pc's. All 6 are running smp with the remaing 9 soon to be 10 gpu clients.

What is my best course of action? Change the user name of all of them to weedacres or get a different passkey for each username?

Maybe this is a good time to redo my whole setup if there is a better way to organize it.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:08 pm
by bruce
weedacres wrote:What is my best course of action? Change the user name of all of them to weedacres or get a different passkey for each username?
Either one will work, but if you use a single username and passkey, you'll qualify for the 10 WU minimum more quickly.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:40 pm
by dschief
bruce wrote:AFAIK both A1 and A2 (and A3) WUs count toward the 10 WU minimum and the 80% minimum for a passkey to qualify for bonuses. After you've qualified your passkey, you only get a bonus on projects which have a Kfactor value.
If that is the case, most folders should be getting the bonus on their first A3. I probably have in excess of 1,000 A2's under my passkey& still no indication of any bonus points

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:45 pm
by weedacres
OK,, thanks for your help!

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:18 pm
by Pick2
Just to further complicate things , I had 6.24b client running for a year + without a passkey.
I stopped the client after a WU finished , got a passkey , dropped in the 6.29 client , did a configure and ran One A3 WU and got a bonus.
P6014 for 484 base points and received 1436 points for it. Go Figure.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:39 pm
by patonb
Actually, I believe I did too. I have 1 a1 associated with my passkey.

My daily total did look normal, and i was expecting a lower value for my smp.

I turned it in around 20:00 27th, it was a 6013 and my name is patonb if you want to check

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:42 pm
by AZBrandon
bruce wrote:
weedacres wrote:What is my best course of action? Change the user name of all of them to weedacres or get a different passkey for each username?
Either one will work, but if you use a single username and passkey, you'll qualify for the 10 WU minimum more quickly.
OK, so if I understand this correctly, the rule is this:

At least 10 A2 WU's returned inside the deadline with:

a) The same passkey
b) The same userid
c) The same team number

I'm pretty sure this is the case because I know for a fact I've turned in > 100 A2 WU's with my current passkey, yet I'm not getting any bonus credit. However, I recently started using a new name/team. I believe the criteria is what I described above. It it NOT just your passkey, it is the combination of all 3 listed above. If anyone can confirm, that would be great, but the fact I'm sending in WU's and not getting bonus seems to substantiate my theory.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:02 pm
by bruce
AFAIK it's two things, not three. The team number shouldn't matter, but the passkey & username do.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:41 pm
by AZBrandon
bruce wrote:AFAIK it's two things, not three. The team number shouldn't matter, but the passkey & username do.
OK, good to hear. With any luck, I only have another 2 or 3 WU's to go then before I reach the 10 mark under the latest username.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:44 pm
by bruce
patonb wrote:Actually, I believe I did too. I have 1 a1 associated with my passkey.

My daily total did look normal, and i was expecting a lower value for my smp.

I turned it in around 20:00 27th, it was a 6013 and my name is patonb if you want to check
I can see a 6014 turned in around noon yesterday (Stanford time). I don't see a 6013 but that's understandable if the same client has submitted another result since then. I have no way of knowing if a passkey was used or not. I can tell that you're not getting bonuses yet.

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:20 pm
by patonb
You're correct on the 6014, I made a mistake... And no bonus was expected... Guess I had a better day than I expected.

Thanks

Re: Yet another bonus plan question

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:35 pm
by dschief
A direct request this time, could a mod check on this one. Just finished a A3 . And the local count shows over 400 completed for this client alone.
if , in-fact no bonus is being applied. could it please be passed up to someone with higher access. to determine why?

Code: Select all

22:15:13] Finished Work Unit:
[22:15:13] - Reading up to 20446800 from "work/wudata_05.trr": Read 20446800
[22:15:14] trr file hash check passed.
[22:15:14] edr file hash check passed.
[22:15:14] logfile size: 56544
[22:15:14] Leaving Run
[22:15:19] - Writing 20536608 bytes of core data to disk...
[22:15:19]   ... Done.
[22:15:20] - Shutting down core
[22:15:20] 
[22:15:20] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[22:15:20] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[22:15:20] Unit 5 finished with [b]92 [/b]percent of time to deadline remaining.
[22:15:20] Updated performance fraction: 0.912235
[22:15:20] Sending work to server
[22:15:20] Project: 6012 (Run 0, Clone 355, Gen 6)


[22:15:20] + Attempting to send results [January 28 22:15:20 UTC]
[22:15:20] - Reading file work/wuresults_05.dat from core
[22:15:20]   (Read 20536608 bytes from disk)
[22:15:20] Connecting to http://130.237.232.140:8080/
[22:24:03] Posted data.
[22:24:03] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~38 kB/s
[22:24:04] - Averaged speed for that direction ~38 kB/s
[22:24:04] + Results successfully sent
[22:24:04] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[22:24:04] + Number of Units Completed: 494

[22:24:05] Trying to send all finished work units
[22:24:05] + No unsent completed units remaining.