future core 17 WU?

If you think it might be a driver problem, see viewforum.php?f=79

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by VijayPande »

ok, this is clearly a serious problem since our changes aren't working. We've been internally thinking of a plan. Here's where we are:
1) core17 update: we've come up with a workaround for core17 so it runs on Maxwell. It won't run as fast as it could (due to the driver issue), but it will at least run. It would run at full speed on non-Maxwell. We're pushing to get that new core17 out.

2) AS update: If we can't resolve the AS issues, we're thinking of reverting back to giving Core17 to everyone, including Maxwell GPUs, even before we get Core17 out, since this is a major issue for non-Maxwell donors.

I'm sorry we don't have better news at the moment, but this is where we are right now. We are actively pushing on both the core update and AS update fronts to fix this.
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
kimben777
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:21 pm
Hardware configuration: 1) 1090t @3.6ghz, corsair 850w psu, 16gb gskill, asus m4a89td pro mb, asus 780 ti
2) fx-8350 @4ghz, cooler master 1000w psu, 8gb gskill, asus m5a99fx pro mb, two asus 780 ti's
3) am3 x4 @3.4ghz, rosewill 650w psu, asus M5A78L-M/USB3 mb, 8gb gskill, asus 780 ti

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by kimben777 »

Thank you for the info.

Ben
billford
Posts: 1003
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 8:46 pm
Hardware configuration: Full Time:

2x NVidia GTX 980
1x NVidia GTX 780 Ti
2x 3GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)

Retired:

3.2GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)
3.2GHz Core i5 iMac
2.8GHz Core i5 iMac
2.16GHz Core 2 Duo iMac
2GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook
1.6GHz Core 2 Duo Acer laptop
Location: Near Oxford, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by billford »

Thanks for that, appreciated.
VijayPande wrote: 1) core17 update: we've come up with a workaround for core17 so it runs on Maxwell. It won't run as fast as it could (due to the driver issue), but it will at least run. It would run at full speed on non-Maxwell. We're pushing to get that new core17 out.
Any feel for the speed penalty eg as a % of what it should be? I've been thinking of getting a Maxwell card (for a Linux box) but will stick with Kepler if it's too slow.
Image
kimben777
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:21 pm
Hardware configuration: 1) 1090t @3.6ghz, corsair 850w psu, 16gb gskill, asus m4a89td pro mb, asus 780 ti
2) fx-8350 @4ghz, cooler master 1000w psu, 8gb gskill, asus m5a99fx pro mb, two asus 780 ti's
3) am3 x4 @3.4ghz, rosewill 650w psu, asus M5A78L-M/USB3 mb, 8gb gskill, asus 780 ti

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by kimben777 »

I have just picked up 2 13000 wu, on 2 different computers both with no flag on 780 ti's.

Ben
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by PantherX »

Windows 8
V7.4.4
client-type is normal (the default)
GTX 660 Ti (Kepler GK104) -> Got 13001 (FahCore_17) @ 2014-04-10T20:34:26Z
GTX 650 (Kepler GK107) -> Got 13000 (FahCore_17) @ 2014-04-10T20:35:37Z

I guess the Servers are playing nice so those having issues getting FahCore_17 WUs on their Kepler GPUs might want to remove any client-type set and see if they get FahCore_17 or not.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by 7im »

billford wrote:Thanks for that, appreciated.
VijayPande wrote: 1) core17 update: we've come up with a workaround for core17 so it runs on Maxwell. It won't run as fast as it could (due to the driver issue), but it will at least run. It would run at full speed on non-Maxwell. We're pushing to get that new core17 out.
Any feel for the speed penalty eg as a % of what it should be? I've been thinking of getting a Maxwell card (for a Linux box) but will stick with Kepler if it's too slow.
Any speed penalty from a temporary work around would then also be temporary, and then the card would be back to normal speed. I am NOT asking for you to answer, but just consider how slow is too slow? How long before the permanent driver fix arrives is too long? Does that change your buying decision?
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by bruce »

Nobody can predict when NV will provide a permanent driver fix.

Right now Maxwell should be getting Core_15 assignments which, compared to core_17, are slow (at least in terms of PPD). The choice between one version of slow and another version of slow won't really be apparent until the new version of Core_17 for Maxwell is tested, and I'm sure those who will be testing it will have an opinion.
billford
Posts: 1003
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 8:46 pm
Hardware configuration: Full Time:

2x NVidia GTX 980
1x NVidia GTX 780 Ti
2x 3GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)

Retired:

3.2GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)
3.2GHz Core i5 iMac
2.8GHz Core i5 iMac
2.16GHz Core 2 Duo iMac
2GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook
1.6GHz Core 2 Duo Acer laptop
Location: Near Oxford, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by billford »

7im wrote: but just consider how slow is too slow? How long before the permanent driver fix arrives is too long? Does that change your buying decision?
Possibly to your surprise, I've considered all those. They don't have definitive answers, but they'll be taken into account as best I can when I make the decision and I'll take the consequences.

If I get it right then I get it right, if I get it wrong then it's about $50 I could have saved (or should have spent) by buying the other card. Hardly life changing either way.
Image
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by 7im »

billford wrote:
7im wrote: but just consider how slow is too slow? How long before the permanent driver fix arrives is too long? Does that change your buying decision?
Possibly to your surprise, I've considered all those. They don't have definitive answers, but they'll be taken into account as best I can when I make the decision and I'll take the consequences.

If I get it right then I get it right, if I get it wrong then it's about $50 I could have saved (or should have spent) by buying the other card. Hardly life changing either way.
No, not surprised you'd say that. Not surprised you cut my quote short either. ;)
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
billford
Posts: 1003
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 8:46 pm
Hardware configuration: Full Time:

2x NVidia GTX 980
1x NVidia GTX 780 Ti
2x 3GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)

Retired:

3.2GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)
3.2GHz Core i5 iMac
2.8GHz Core i5 iMac
2.16GHz Core 2 Duo iMac
2GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook
1.6GHz Core 2 Duo Acer laptop
Location: Near Oxford, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by billford »

7im wrote:Not surprised you cut my quote short either. ;)
I (usually) only quote the bits I'm responding to, it makes for brevity :wink:

Bruce had adequately covered the first point (in effect- "how temporary is temporary?") and I saw no point in repeating it!

Anyway, I've had a good look around and tried (not entirely successfully) to understand how GPU specs relate to folding performance, and am leaning towards going for broke and getting a GTX 780 Ti. Though I suspect I'll have to drop the Ti :(

But either will severely limit my interest in Maxwell for some time to come :)
Image
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by VijayPande »

So, it sounds like the assign issue is now resolved?
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
Rel25917
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:31 am

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by Rel25917 »

It seem like my keplers on adv or beta ar at least getting sent to p1300x instead of 8018 but wont grab adv/beta work. Improved but still a little wonky.
kimben777
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:21 pm
Hardware configuration: 1) 1090t @3.6ghz, corsair 850w psu, 16gb gskill, asus m4a89td pro mb, asus 780 ti
2) fx-8350 @4ghz, cooler master 1000w psu, 8gb gskill, asus m5a99fx pro mb, two asus 780 ti's
3) am3 x4 @3.4ghz, rosewill 650w psu, asus M5A78L-M/USB3 mb, 8gb gskill, asus 780 ti

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by kimben777 »

Consistently getting 1300x wu's with no flag on 3 780 ti's.

Ben
kimben777
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:21 pm
Hardware configuration: 1) 1090t @3.6ghz, corsair 850w psu, 16gb gskill, asus m4a89td pro mb, asus 780 ti
2) fx-8350 @4ghz, cooler master 1000w psu, 8gb gskill, asus m5a99fx pro mb, two asus 780 ti's
3) am3 x4 @3.4ghz, rosewill 650w psu, asus M5A78L-M/USB3 mb, 8gb gskill, asus 780 ti

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by kimben777 »

I just picked up a 7626 wu with no flag on 780 ti, I guess I'll switch to advanced.

Ben
kimben777
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:21 pm
Hardware configuration: 1) 1090t @3.6ghz, corsair 850w psu, 16gb gskill, asus m4a89td pro mb, asus 780 ti
2) fx-8350 @4ghz, cooler master 1000w psu, 8gb gskill, asus m5a99fx pro mb, two asus 780 ti's
3) am3 x4 @3.4ghz, rosewill 650w psu, asus M5A78L-M/USB3 mb, 8gb gskill, asus 780 ti

Re: future core 17 WU?

Post by kimben777 »

Changed to advanced and picked up a core 17 wu.

Ben
Post Reply