Project: 3798 (Run 26, Clone 0, Gen 50)

[Leoslocks]

Code: Select all

Waiting before retry.
[21:07:54] + Attempting to get work packet
[21:07:54] - Connecting to assignment server
[21:07:54] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.122.139).
[21:07:54] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[21:07:54] Loaded queue successfully.
[21:10:38] + Closed connections
[21:10:38] 
[21:10:38] + Processing work unit
[21:10:38] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[21:10:38] Core found.
[21:10:38] Working on queue slot 00 [March 13 21:10:38 UTC]
[21:10:38] + Working ...
[21:10:38] 
[21:10:38] *------------------------------*
[21:10:38] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[21:10:38] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[21:10:38] 
[21:10:38] Preparing to commence simulation
[21:10:38] - Looking at optimizations...
[21:10:38] - Created dyn
[21:10:38] - Files status OK
[21:10:38] - Expanded 238092 -> 1167708 (decompressed 490.4 percent)
[21:10:38] - Starting from initial work packet
[21:10:38] 
[21:10:38] [21:10:38] 
[21:10:38] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[21:10:38] Entering M.D.
[21:10:44] Protein: p3798
[21:10:44] 
[21:10:44] Writing local files
[21:12:06] Extra SSE boost OK.
[21:12:07] Writing local files
[21:12:07] Completed 0 out of 1500 steps  (0%)
[21:12:34] Writing local files
[21:12:34] Completed 500 out of 1500 steps  (33%)
[21:13:02] Writing local files
[21:13:02] Completed 1000 out of 1500 steps  (67%)
[21:13:29] Writing local files
[21:13:29] Completed 1500 out of 1500 steps  (100%)
[21:13:29] Writing final coordinates.
[21:13:30] Past main M.D. loop
[21:14:29] 
[21:14:29] Finished Work Unit:
[21:14:29] - Reading up to 550656 from "work/wudata_00.arc": Read 550656
[21:14:29] - Reading up to 0 from "work/wudata_00.xtc": Read 0
[21:14:29] goefile size: 0
[21:14:29] Leaving Run
[21:14:33] - Writing 573212 bytes of core data to disk...
[21:14:33] Done: 572700 -> 518513 (compressed to 90.5 percent)
[21:14:33]   ... Done.
[21:14:33] - Shutting down core
[21:14:33] 
[21:14:33] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[21:14:38] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[21:14:38] Sending work to server
[21:14:38] Project: 3798 (Run 26, Clone 0, Gen 50)


[21:14:38] + Attempting to send results [March 13 21:14:38 UTC]
[21:23:54] + Results successfully sent
[21:23:54] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[21:23:54] + Number of Units Completed: 76

What is up with this WU?

Same result with the following;
Project: 3798 (Run 32, Clone 2, Gen 50)
Project: 3798 (Run 38, Clone 4, Gen 50)
Project: 3798 (Run 27, Clone 1, Gen 50)
Project: 3798 (Run 7, Clone 4, Gen 50)

[toTOW]

I don't know, but each WU has been completed multiple times by many different people.

That might be related to the issues we're seeing with this server : viewtopic.php?f=18&t=7756

[Leoslocks]

This WU seems to follow machines that are stalled and waiting for work but jut how much work is done in 2 minutes 43 seconds?

[23:19:11] Writing local files
[23:20:32] Extra SSE boost OK.
[23:20:32] Writing local files
[23:20:32] Completed 0 out of 1500 steps (0%)
[23:21:00] Writing local files
[23:21:00] Completed 500 out of 1500 steps (33%)
[23:21:27] Writing local files
[23:21:27] Completed 1000 out of 1500 steps (67%)
[23:21:54] Writing local files
[23:21:54] Completed 1500 out of 1500 steps (100%)
[23:21:54] Writing final coordinates.
[23:21:54] Past main M.D. loop

[toTOW]

p3798 is the project used to test the new server code ... the WU are intentionally small to easily stress the server code.

By the way, I don't know if there are still testing done on this server, or these WU are being set out by mistake ...

[Leoslocks]

I hope they get the servers operating better. I know several folders on the HWC team that dont tolerate stalled CPU clients well. The CPU client is supose to be stable yet they are down more often than either the GPU or SMP clients.

[whynot]

I've done 135 WUs of 3798 project. Still looking anyone beating me at that

[WangFeiHong]

"Project 3798
This project is just to test some new FAH code."
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fahproject?p=3798

I believe this WU was created to test the stressing of their servers on the netload.

It's reported here as well:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=7756

[Leoslocks]

It is clear as Mud now.

Neither of the clients getting this WU have -advmethods set

The project is not listed on the Project Summary page.

I am not a beta tester either but Stanford can use me as they see fit. I am happy to help

[toTOW]

I've done 135 WUs of 3798 project. Still looking anyone beating me at that

Code: Select all

P3798	247

It looks like the netload has gone down on this server ...

[Flathead74]

Code: Select all

P3798	413

No problems with them, here.

[bruce]

See other comments about this project
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=7315
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=8982

[MtM]

I was wondering about this wu as well as it's not on psummary so I got no info in fahmon, I know it's just a testing wu but maybe adding it would be not to much trouble and will prevent others from searching for info on it?

Though, with the number of completed wu's some have I don't see many posts asking about it so it's probably a mute point.

*edit

I think it was listed on the summary before which is why it's a known project for most, but I think people just getting it now won't see any info for it as it's not on any summary page.

[Eenhoorn]

I've got my first one of these WU's today and it has a total runtime of 2h30m on a E6600 running at 2.4 MGHz. A lot longer then most people posting here

[MtM]

I've got my first one of these WU's today and it has a total runtime of 2h30m on a E6600 running at 2.4 MGHz. A lot longer then most people posting here

Ja maar de waardering is ook hoger dan hier in het begin van de thread, 5 punten of 250 punten dus de waardering is hetzelfde

Sorry for the dutch, just said the points where increased as well as the length so it should give the same ppd.

[Eenhoorn]

And were did you find the value of these WU's?, because, as mentioned, they are not listed on the project summary or in FahMon.