toTOW wrote:Why can't we have the choice with the subSilver theme (that should be installed by default) ...
This one is too ... blue
1. I agree. Way too much blue.
2. the Gifs for showing new posts is way too similar to one's indicating no new posts.
3. top logo for Folding is WAY too blue.
Do you mean the little orange icons, or the topic icons (the circles with lines on them)?
Either way I can make the new posts a bit more obvious (I think).
the circles with lines. Moreover, these icons appear to be not icons, but merely lines that delineate something.
1 icon can be a circle, and the other icon should not be, imho.
Running GPU since it came out, CPU since client version 3. Folding since Folding began (~2000) and ran Genome@Home for a while too. Ran Seti@Home prior to that.
Yeah, id kill for quick reply. It makes replying a joy, compared to a heavy march.
On a seperate question:
Is it possible for the General non-FAH section to be placed below the General FAH section, and the Stats section to be placed above the General section?
Is it possible for the General non-FAH section to be placed below the General FAH section, and the Stats section to be placed above the General section?
Running GPU since it came out, CPU since client version 3. Folding since Folding began (~2000) and ran Genome@Home for a while too. Ran Seti@Home prior to that.
Im actually surprised the phpbb developers didnt put that feature in as standard. It is one of the more useful things that phpbb has seen a late. But i guess the ajax usage disqualifies it.
v00d00 wrote:Yeah, id kill for quick reply. It makes replying a joy, compared to a heavy march.
I'm sure you can cope with the 1 extra click for the time being
But the quick reply will permit to save bandwidth, deleting one entire page to load because there is only the area "Post a reply" included in the quick reply.
Actually when you take the habit to use the quick reply, then it's so difficult to return to the normal reply
Running GPU since it came out, CPU since client version 3. Folding since Folding began (~2000) and ran Genome@Home for a while too. Ran Seti@Home prior to that.
v00d00 wrote:Yeah, id kill for quick reply. It makes replying a joy, compared to a heavy march.
I'm sure you can cope with the 1 extra click for the time being
But the quick reply will permit to save bandwidth, deleting one entire page to load because there is only the area "Post a reply" included in the quick reply.
Actually when you take the habit to use the quick reply, then it's so difficult to return to the normal reply
But only for the people, who have memorised the common BBcode options. Everyone else who wants to post a reply would use the full version.
Even then you have cutback on a bit of bandwidth, and i suspect the regulars would just use quick reply, as you no longer have to wait 2 secs (or more if on 56k) for the reply page to load up.
The only quick reply mod i can see at present, though, is this one.
v00d00 wrote:
But only for the people, who have memorised the common BBcode options. Everyone else who wants to post a reply would use the full version.
Even then you have cutback on a bit of bandwidth, and i suspect the regulars would just use quick reply, as you no longer have to wait 2 secs (or more if on 56k) for the reply page to load up.
The only quick reply mod i can see at present, though, is this one.
You can also add the smilies and the BBCODE bar so that there is NO difference between the quick reply and the normal reply, excpect the "options area checkbox" and the posts in reverse order....
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540 (3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3 Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
anko1 wrote:I like the banners over the personal info part that tell you whether someone is online.
...neat! too bad we can't equip some of the machines with breathalyzers to determine if the users are okay to be at the keyboard! ...THAT would be really cool.
anko1 wrote:I like the banners over the personal info part that tell you whether someone is online.
...neat! too bad we can't equip some of the machines with breathalyzers to determine if the users are okay to be at the keyboard! ...THAT would be really cool.
I'm just grateful they haven't yet found a way to put an automagic camera pixel in to blast my underwear all over the web !!
... ... Free Republic Folders - A Tribute to Ronald Reagan ... ...