Zotac Geforce 1650 appears to be read as TU116 vs TU117

Post requests to add new GPUs to the official whitelist here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
XanderF
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:25 am

Zotac Geforce 1650 appears to be read as TU116 vs TU117

Post by XanderF »

As above:

Code: Select all

fahclient --lspci
VendorID:DeviceID:PCI Bus:PCI Slot:PCI function:Vendor Name:Description
0x10de:0x1f82:1:0:0:NVIDIA Corporation:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
If I look up that ID in GPUs.txt, I see:

Code: Select all

0x10de:0x1f82:2:7:TU116 [GeForce GTX 1650] 2984
However, it's not a TU116, it's a TU117:

Image
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7926
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Zotac Geforce 1650 appears to be read as TU116 vs TU117

Post by Joe_H »

Both the TU116 and TU117 have been used on GTX 1650 cards, so this may depend on when the card was made. In any case it does not make any functional difference to folding. Anything in the GPUs.txt entry to the right of the last colon is just a text field used for display purposes only.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
XanderF
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:25 am

Re: Zotac Geforce 1650 appears to be read as TU116 vs TU117

Post by XanderF »

Joe_H wrote:Both the TU116 and TU117 have been used on GTX 1650 cards, so this may depend on when the card was made. In any case it does not make any functional difference to folding. Anything in the GPUs.txt entry to the right of the last colon is just a text field used for display purposes only.
Quite so, however you'll notice there are 9 different entries for "gtx 1650" in the gpus.txt, with most correctly identifying from the ID (to the left of the last colon) whether it was a TU116 or TU117. This one line seems wrong.

As to usage - I agree F@H doesn't especially care, it's just an error, so OCD-triggering. :D

Also I suppose when updating to a site that tracks GPU performance by chip (IE., https://folding.lar.systems/ or somesuch), the distinction between TU116 and TU117 performance may be important to distinguish, and this confuses that.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Zotac Geforce 1650 appears to be read as TU116 vs TU117

Post by toTOW »

I updated the entry on the server ...
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
XanderF
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:25 am

Re: Zotac Geforce 1650 appears to be read as TU116 vs TU117

Post by XanderF »

toTOW wrote:I updated the entry on the server ...
Looks good, now - thanks!
Post Reply