Azure servers down 40.121.152.108 / 52.224.109.74

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

alantear
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:11 am

Re: WU not sending (40.114.52.201 and 52.224.109.74)

Post by alantear »

I am having the same problem with 52.224.109.74:80 and 40.114.52.201:80. I plan to stop folding and check every few days whether the fault is corrected before I continue.
Hopfgeist
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:07 pm
Hardware configuration: Dell T420, 2x Xeon E5-2470 v2, NetBSD 10, SunFire X2270 M2, 2x Xeon X5675, NetBSD 9; various other Linux/NetBSD PCs, Macs and virtual servers.
Location: Germany

Re: WU not sending (40.114.52.201 and 52.224.109.74)

Post by Hopfgeist »

alantear wrote:I am having the same problem with 52.224.109.74:80 and 40.114.52.201:80. I plan to stop folding and check every few days whether the fault is corrected before I continue.
Why would you? The faulty servers won't give out new WUs, so every new WU you download now will very likely complete and be uploaded just fine. Just those that were downloaded, but not finished, before the servers failed, will "hang" there until they expire. But everything else should just continue.

I think Neil-B's advice is perfectly sound, as that seems to be exactly what happens:
Neil-B wrote:[...] let your client handle this (it will retry until the server is up and it uploads or until it passes expiration and is dumped by the client) and keeping folding from the servers that are up would be the normal approach (the client is designed to work this way) [...]
I can confirm that all my 6 clients, including the 3 that have "hanging" work-units, continue to download, fold and upload work units as usual, with only that one brief "hiccup". And I did not touch them at all.


Bernd
Image
Dell PowerEdge T420: 2x Xeon E5-2470 v2
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon [email protected], 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon [email protected], 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: [email protected], 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: WU not sending (40.114.52.201 and 52.224.109.74)

Post by Neil-B »

Just a heads up though ... and not really this thread but relevant under current circumstances:

Server page shows 35 WS in total - 7 are down, 11 are accept only so less than half WS farm is serving out WUs - other threads as indicating that the AS are possibly struggling to find non busy WS to send people to for new assignments - so in this current circumstances people need to be prepared for some possible "no WUs available for this configuration" delays in getting new WUs.

As I said not an answer to this topic as such but something to be prepared for under current situation.
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
moritzgedig
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:04 am

Can not upload to 40.121.152.108 nor 52.224.109.74

Post by moritzgedig »

I would attach the log files but can not find the option.
0xa7: Project: 14819 (Run 1842, Clone 0, Gen 219)
project:14819 run:1842 clone:0 gen:219 core:0xa7
Is done but I am stuck with it.
donating since 2001
Ichbin3
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 8:06 am
Hardware configuration: MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
Location: Germany

azure servers are down 40.121.152.108 / 52.224.109.74

Post by Ichbin3 »

Both servers are down actually.
https://apps.foldingathome.org/serverstats
Your topic is also discussed here:
viewtopic.php?f=108&t=35814
Image
MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
Familyman_19
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2020 2:20 am

Re: WU not sending (40.114.52.201 and 52.224.109.74)

Post by Familyman_19 »

Thanks for the replies. As others have mentioned the new WU are going fine, so no big deal. My OCD doesn't like the stuck WU being there, but I'll manage!
psaam0001
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am
Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

Re: Large number of servers down

Post by psaam0001 »

An inquiry... How does the F@H client handle completed WU' results that are waiting to be sent back, as far as expiration time outs/dumping when the CS is down?

Paul
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon [email protected], 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon [email protected], 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: [email protected], 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: Large number of servers down

Post by Neil-B »

The client will keep trying to send until the expiration deadline is passed at which time it will remove/delete/drop the WU.
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
moritzgedig
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:04 am

Re: Can not upload to 40.121.152.108 nor 52.224.109.74

Post by moritzgedig »

Ichbin3 wrote:Both servers are down actually.
https://apps.foldingathome.org/serverstats
Your topic is also discussed here:
viewtopic.php?f=108&t=35814
THX
donating since 2001
psaam0001
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am
Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

Re: Large number of servers down

Post by psaam0001 »

That's what I thought.... [Expletive] gremlins!! I'd like to be able to fold them up, and return them to the sender (international FedEx/UPS fees due on arrival).

OTOH: Hopefully there will be a progress update, as soon as one of the Project Managers are able to give us one. Till then: Keep folding!!!

Paul
hman2
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:42 pm

fah1+4.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com seem to be down

Post by hman2 »

At least the web server part. Because fah4 does ping:

ping 146.94.192.82
PING 146.94.192.82 (146.94.192.82) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 146.94.192.82: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=129 ms
64 bytes from 146.94.192.82: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=129 ms
64 bytes from 146.94.192.82: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=129 ms

But it does not respond on ports 80 and 8080:

10:07:11:WARNING:WU01:FS01:WorkServer connection failed on port 8080 trying 80
10:07:11:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 52.224.109.74:80
10:07:11:ERROR:WU01:FS01:Exception: Failed to connect to 52.224.109.74:80: Connection refused

Same issue with fah1.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com: pings okay:
PING fah1.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com (40.114.52.201) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fah1.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com (40.114.52.201): icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=132 ms
64 bytes from fah1.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com (40.114.52.201): icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=115 ms

but refuses to connect on 80 or 8080:
10:07:10:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 40.114.52.201:8080
10:07:10:WARNING:WU01:FS01:WorkServer connection failed on port 8080 trying 80
10:07:10:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 40.114.52.201:80
10:07:10:WARNING:WU01:FS01:Exception: Failed to send results to work server: Failed to connect to 40.114.52.201:80: Connection refused

A quick check with Firefox confirms: fah1 and fa4 cannot be contacted. They are listed as down on the server stats page, too.
Problems with Azure?
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon [email protected], 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon [email protected], 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: [email protected], 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: fah1+4.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com seem to be down

Post by Neil-B »

There are a number of threads on this topic ... and the server status page clarifies which servers are down
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
hman2
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 10:42 pm

Re: fah1+4.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com seem to be down

Post by hman2 »

Ah, I see there was a posting about a larger server down situation, sorry I did not see that (only searched by IP and name...).
MoelTryfan
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2020 11:00 am

Re: fah1+4.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com seem to be down

Post by MoelTryfan »

Have WUs on two machines that have been trying to upload results to 52.224.109.74 for several days.
Neil-B
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon [email protected], 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon [email protected], 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: [email protected], 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: fah1+4.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com seem to be down

Post by Neil-B »

Four servers (inc this one) "went down" on Friday 17th - see Last Contact https://apps.foldingathome.org/serverstats.

Whilst there ahs been no formal statement afaik re these it would appear something happened and that the resolution is not a simple one (and there has been a weekend to delay things further) ... Hopefully the servers will come up again soon, but until then it is simply the case of letting you client handle the retry attempts and hoping the WU(s) get a chance to upload before the expiration deadline is reached, at which point the WU(s) will be automatically dumped by the client.
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
Post Reply