WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
cine.chris
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2020 1:29 pm

WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by cine.chris »

PPD in the 700k range on a 2060s. Utilization ~75%, high interface utilization, low FB usage when compared to identical 2nd GPU. 2nd GPU is running at 1,627K PPD.
Image Image
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by bruce »

Proteins being analyized may be large or small. They are assigned (mostly) randomly to GPUs which also come in various configurations. A large protein necessarily has many calculations which can be done in parallel by GPUs that have a large number of shaders. On the other hand small proteins have very few calcluations whicn can be done in parallel and all the serisal protions still have to be performed. Your 2060 is great at processing large proteins and not so good working on small proteins.

Project 16904 has only 32,000 atoms.

There's an open ticket for an enhancement to optimize the assignments.
https://github.com/FoldingAtHome/fah-issues/issues/1479
cine.chris
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2020 1:29 pm

Re: WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by cine.chris »

bruce wrote: great at processing large proteins and not so good working on small proteins.
Project 16904 has only 32,000 atoms.
Interesting.
Is there any advantage to the project for donors to be running a mix of hardware... GPU/CPU, # of cores? Smaller GPUs?
Image Image
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by bruce »

The smallest proteins work best on a CPU slot. Intermediate sized proteins work well on low to intermediate GPUs. Large prtiens work well on the latest (and widest) GPUs.

Unfortunately, you don't get to choose.
Ichbin3
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 8:06 am
Hardware configuration: MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
Location: Germany

Re: WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by Ichbin3 »

Same issue here with 16907@2080Ti.
This low-atom-projects should not be assigned to hight end gpus.
As I'm informed there are some possibilities to assure this, no?
Image
MSI H81M, G3240, RTX 2080Ti_Rev-A@220W, Ubuntu 18.04
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by bruce »

Not yet
Frontiers
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:23 pm
Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 5600x
G.Skill 2x16 GB 3200@3333
GTX 1070
Lancool II Mesh Perf.
Linux Mint 21.3
some drives, some cooler, some peripherials

Re: WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by Frontiers »

With another project from 1690x bunch, PRCG 16908 (0, 8, 13), mine have all time antirecord - FAHCore used only 40% of board (not chip) TDP for only 50% of usual average PPD.
It may be good if next versions of OpenMM and FAH_cores would be modified for crunching such small atom count projects parallel in pairs, 2 simultaneously at each GPU. Or even 3 or 4 in parallel with powerful GPUs with very high CU counts.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: WU 16904 VERY low PPD

Post by bruce »

You can suggest that enhancement here: https://github.com/FoldingAtHome/fah-issues.

Unfortunately I suspect the relatively small WUs that would warrant such a combination will probably end up finding a way to be assigned to slower systems including the soon-to-be-supported ARM systems. I bet they'll get pretty good utilization on my smart phone or somebody's Raspberry Pi, even if they're somewhat slower than on your RTX device.
Post Reply