No QRB for 9024?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

No QRB for 9024?

Post by Kebast »

9024(188,4,33) reports Base Credit 207, Estimated Credit 207 in FAHControl. My TPF is 2 min 11 sec. What's up?

Code: Select all

*********************** Log Started 2015-10-23T20:04:01Z ***********************
20:04:01:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
20:04:01:      Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
20:04:01:    Copyright: (c) 2009-2014 Stanford University
20:04:01:       Author: Joseph Coffland <[email protected]>
20:04:01:         Args: 
20:04:01:       Config: C:/Users/User/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/config.xml
20:04:01:******************************** Build ********************************
20:04:01:      Version: 7.4.4
20:04:01:         Date: Mar 4 2014
20:04:01:         Time: 20:26:54
20:04:01:      SVN Rev: 4130
20:04:01:       Branch: fah/trunk/client
20:04:01:     Compiler: Intel(R) C++ MSVC 1500 mode 1200
20:04:01:      Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /Qdiag-disable:4297,4103,1786,279 /Ox -arch:SSE
20:04:01:               /QaxSSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2 /Qopenmp /Qrestrict /MT /Qmkl
20:04:01:     Platform: win32 XP
20:04:01:         Bits: 32
20:04:01:         Mode: Release
20:04:01:******************************* System ********************************
20:04:01:          CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5603 @ 1.60GHz
20:04:01:       CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 44 Stepping 2
20:04:01:         CPUs: 8
20:04:01:       Memory: 3.25GiB
20:04:01:  Free Memory: 2.09GiB
20:04:01:      Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
20:04:01:   OS Version: 6.1
20:04:01:  Has Battery: false
20:04:01:   On Battery: false
20:04:01:   UTC Offset: -5
20:04:01:          PID: 5340
20:04:01:          CWD: C:/Users/User/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient
20:04:01:           OS: Windows 7 Professional Service Pack 1
20:04:01:      OS Arch: X86
20:04:01:         GPUs: 2
20:04:01:        GPU 0: NVIDIA:2 GF108 [Quadro 600]
20:04:01:        GPU 1: NVIDIA:2 GF108 [Quadro 600]
20:04:01:         CUDA: 2.1
20:04:01:  CUDA Driver: 7050
20:04:01:Win32 Service: false
20:04:01:***********************************************************************
20:04:01:<config>
20:04:01:  <!-- Folding Core -->
20:04:01:  <core-priority v='low'/>
20:04:01:
20:04:01:  <!-- Network -->
20:04:01:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
20:04:01:
20:04:01:  <!-- Slot Control -->
20:04:01:  <power v='full'/>
20:04:01:
20:04:01:  <!-- User Information -->
20:04:01:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
20:04:01:  <team v='229226'/>
20:04:01:  <user v='Kebast'/>
20:04:01:
20:04:01:  <!-- Work Unit Control -->
20:04:01:  <next-unit-percentage v='100'/>
20:04:01:
20:04:01:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
20:04:01:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'>
20:04:01:    <cpus v='8'/>
20:04:01:  </slot>
20:04:01:  <slot id='1' type='GPU'>
20:04:01:    <max-packet-size v='small'/>
20:04:01:  </slot>
20:04:01:  <slot id='2' type='GPU'>
20:04:01:    <max-packet-size v='small'/>
20:04:01:  </slot>
20:04:01:</config>
20:04:01:Trying to access database...
20:04:01:Successfully acquired database lock
20:04:01:Enabled folding slot 00: READY cpu:8
20:04:01:Enabled folding slot 01: READY gpu:0:GF108 [Quadro 600]
20:04:01:Enabled folding slot 02: READY gpu:1:GF108 [Quadro 600]
20:04:01:WU03:FS01:Starting
20:04:01:WU03:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/User/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/x86/NVIDIA/Fermi/Core_15.fah/FahCore_15.exe -dir 03 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 5340 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0 -gpu-vendor nvidia
20:04:01:WU03:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 5908
20:04:01:WU03:FS01:Core PID:5948
20:04:01:WU03:FS01:FahCore 0x15 started
20:04:01:WU02:FS00:Starting
20:04:01:WU02:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/User/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/x86/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 5340 -checkpoint 15 -np 8
20:04:01:WU02:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 6008
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:Core PID:6032
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:*------------------------------*
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Core                   15
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Window's signal control handler registered.
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Preparing to commence simulation
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:- Looking at optimizations...
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:- Files status OK
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:- Expanded 124733 -> 501826 (decompressed 402.3 percent)
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=124733 data_size=501826, decompressed_data_size=501826 diff=0
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:- Digital signature verified
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Project: 7621 (Run 682, Clone 0, Gen 632)
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Assembly optimizations on if available.
20:04:02:WU03:FS01:0x15:Entering M.D.
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:Starting
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/User/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/x86/NVIDIA/Fermi/Core_15.fah/FahCore_15.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 5340 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 1 -gpu-vendor nvidia
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:Started FahCore on PID 6096
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:Core PID:6108
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:FahCore 0x15 started
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 825599 -> 1401112 (decompressed 169.7 percent)
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=825599 data_size=1401112, decompressed_data_size=1401112 diff=0
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9024 (Run 188, Clone 4, Gen 33)
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
20:04:02:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:*------------------------------*
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Folding@Home GPU Core
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Version                2.25 (Wed May 9 17:03:01 EDT 2012)
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Build host             AmoebaRemote
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Board Type             NVIDIA/CUDA
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Core                   15
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:GPU device info vendor=0 device=0 name=NA match=0 deviceId=1
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Window's signal control handler registered.
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Preparing to commence simulation
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:- Looking at optimizations...
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:- Files status OK
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:- Expanded 145988 -> 660986 (decompressed 452.7 percent)
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=145988 data_size=660986, decompressed_data_size=660986 diff=0
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:- Digital signature verified
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Project: 8018 (Run 1196, Clone 0, Gen 1458)
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Assembly optimizations on if available.
20:04:02:WU00:FS02:0x15:Entering M.D.
20:04:04:WU03:FS01:0x15:Will resume from checkpoint file 03/wudata_01.ckp
20:04:04:WU03:FS01:0x15:Tpr hash 03/wudata_01.tpr:  4258653739 2137526730 1257292683 3263217877 3678349277
20:04:04:WU03:FS01:0x15:GPU device id=0
20:04:04:WU03:FS01:0x15:Working on Protein
20:04:04:WU03:FS01:0x15:Client config unavailable.
20:04:04:WU03:FS01:0x15:Starting GUI Server
20:04:04:WU00:FS02:0x15:Will resume from checkpoint file 00/wudata_01.ckp
20:04:04:WU00:FS02:0x15:Tpr hash 00/wudata_01.tpr:  722652506 742983113 3340729775 3664482097 2264776579
20:04:04:WU00:FS02:0x15:GPU device id=1
20:04:04:WU00:FS02:0x15:Working on GRowing Old MAkes el Chrono Sweat
20:04:04:WU00:FS02:0x15:Client config unavailable.
20:04:05:WU00:FS02:0x15:Starting GUI Server
20:04:08:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Using Gromacs checkpoints
20:04:08:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 8 to 8 
20:04:09:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Resuming from checkpoint
20:04:09:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Verified 02/wudata_01.log
20:04:09:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Verified 02/wudata_01.trr
20:04:09:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Verified 02/wudata_01.xtc
20:04:09:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Verified 02/wudata_01.edr
20:04:09:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Completed 180085 out of 250000 steps  (72%)
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:Resuming from checkpoint
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: retreived and current tpr file hash:
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:   0   4258653739   4258653739
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:   1   2137526730   2137526730
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:   2   1257292683   1257292683
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:   3   3263217877   3263217877
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:   4   3678349277   3678349277
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: file hashes same.
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: state restored.
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 03/wudata_01.log Verified 03/wudata_01.log
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 03/wudata_01.trr Verified 03/wudata_01.trr
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 03/wudata_01.xtc Verified 03/wudata_01.xtc
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 03/wudata_01.edr Verified 03/wudata_01.edr
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: state restored 2
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:Resumed from checkpoint
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:Setting checkpoint frequency: 400000
20:05:14:WU03:FS01:0x15:Completed  16400001 out of 40000000 steps (41%).
20:05:15:WARNING:WU03:FS01:Detected clock skew (1 mins 14 secs), adjusting time estimates
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:Resuming from checkpoint
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: retreived and current tpr file hash:
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:   0    722652506    722652506
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:   1    742983113    742983113
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:   2   3340729775   3340729775
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:   3   3664482097   3664482097
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:   4   2264776579   2264776579
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: file hashes same.
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: state restored.
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.log Verified 00/wudata_01.log
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.trr Verified 00/wudata_01.trr
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.xtc Verified 00/wudata_01.xtc
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.edr Verified 00/wudata_01.edr
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:fcCheckPointResume: state restored 2
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:Resumed from checkpoint
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:Setting checkpoint frequency: 250000
20:05:19:WU00:FS02:0x15:Completed   1000001 out of 25000000 steps (4%).
20:06:36:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Completed 182500 out of 250000 steps  (73%)
20:08:44:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Completed 185000 out of 250000 steps  (74%)
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
Top
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7995
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by Joe_H »

Since your passkey is entered as shown in the log, no idea why the client is not estimating the points correctly. Will need to check after the WU is completed and turned in to see if it got just the base points or points that include the QRB. It has not been a problem with Project 9024 before that I recall.
Image
Top
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by bruce »

How long was the system off or sleeping before this log you posted was started? A TPF of 2:11 means it should be completed in 3:38 PROVIDED there are no interruptions in processing between download and upload. Then, too, the projected TPF (and therefore the ETA) are estimates based on completing a few percentages at a uniform rate. Obviously if the completion time can't be ESTIMATED accurately, neither can the the estimated points. When you make changes to the settings or otherwise do things which disrupt that orderly completion of a few percentage, it takes a while to reestablish reasonable estimates. Let FAH run a while before you look at those numbers.
Top
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:
Contact 7im

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by 7im »

In addition to what Bruce said to let it run for more than 3 frames to get a better PPD estimate, it could also be the other part of what he said. If the work unit was downloaded a week ago, but the PC was not folding all that time, the timeout or deadline may pass before the WU is finished, even at 2 min per frame, hence no bonus. What does FAHControl show for the download and timeout date?
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Top
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7995
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by Joe_H »

The WU did get the QRB as part of the points awarded:
Hi Kebast (team 229226),
Your WU (P9024 R188 C4 G33) was added to the stats database on 2015-10-23 18:08:18 for 1298.72 points of credit.
Image
Top
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by Kebast »

Thanks, I haven't had a chance to log in to that machine, but thanks for checking! The log I posted was a few minutes after doing another copy/paste of the passcode and restarting the machine. It had been running unhindered for several days before that. I had noticed some very odd numbers at times in the Estimated credit though. It's listed 50-80k ppd at times for the CPU slot. I'll check it in a bit and see if the current WU is listed appropriately.
Joe_H wrote:The WU did get the QRB as part of the points awarded:
Hi Kebast (team 229226),
Your WU (P9024 R188 C4 G33) was added to the stats database on 2015-10-23 18:08:18 for 1298.72 points of credit.
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
Top
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by Kebast »

The machine is doing the same thing today for a 9028 WU (207 base, 207 estimated). The log file shows the correct estimated credit though for completed WU. I'll take a look at the next one in 3 hours or so.
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
Top
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by bruce »

Have you run FAH both with and without Admin privileges?

If so, do a FINISH and when everything has uploaded, install again, including data. (This is just a guess.)
Top
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by Kebast »

I've never ran it specifically With. It's worked OK up to this point. I'll play with it when I next have some free time. It seems to be folding OK, and sending the results up, so I'll leave it be for now.
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
Top
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by bruce »

Are you ALWAYS starting FAHClient with the shortcut provided or are you using some other method. The shortcut opens the proper local directory.
Top
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by Kebast »

I'm not sure I've ever started it manually on this machine. It just gets loaded on boot. I pull up FAHControl from the icon in the system tray.
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
Top
Kebast
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:21 pm

Re: No QRB for 9024?

Post by Kebast »

It's also amusing when it shows me this :)

http://picpaste.com/WU_6386-SMyIewil.png
Image
Ryzen 5900x 12T - RTX 4070 TI
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Issues with a specific WU”