Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Grandpa_01 »

Code: Select all

17:52:20:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 79200 out of 80000 steps  (99%)
17:52:20:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
17:52:20:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
17:52:20:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
17:52:21:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
17:52:21:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
17:52:21:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
17:52:21:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
17:52:21:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
17:52:22:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
17:52:22:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
17:52:47:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Completed 80000 out of 80000 steps  (100%)
17:52:48:WU01:FS02:0xa4:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Finished Work Unit:
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Reading up to 4126776 from "01/wudata_01.trr": Read 4126776
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:trr file hash check passed.
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Reading up to 3196876 from "01/wudata_01.xtc": Read 3196876
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:xtc file hash check passed.
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:edr file hash check passed.
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:logfile size: 19867
17:52:58:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Leaving Run
17:52:59:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Writing 7345911 bytes of core data to disk...
17:53:00:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Done: 7345399 -> 7073408 (compressed to 96.2 percent)
17:53:00:WU01:FS02:0xa4:  ... Done.
17:53:06:WU01:FS02:0xa4:- Shutting down core
17:53:06:WU01:FS02:0xa4:
17:53:06:WU01:FS02:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
17:53:07:WU01:FS02:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
17:53:07:WU01:FS02:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:9752 run:1792 clone:0 gen:310 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000195ab40416355417404fd0a3525
17:53:07:WU01:FS02:Uploading 6.75MiB to 171.64.65.99
17:53:07:WU01:FS02:Connecting to 171.64.65.99:8080
17:53:13:WU01:FS02:Upload 71.34%
17:53:18:WU01:FS02:Upload complete
17:53:18:WU01:FS02:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
17:53:18:WU01:FS02:Final credit estimate, 4770.00 points
17:53:18:WU01:FS02:Cleaning up
17:53:21:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
17:53:21:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
17:53:21:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
17:53:22:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
17:53:22:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
17:54:58:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
17:54:59:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
17:54:59:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
17:54:59:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
17:54:59:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
17:57:36:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
17:57:36:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
17:57:36:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
17:57:36:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
17:57:36:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
18:01:50:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
18:01:50:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
18:01:50:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
18:01:51:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
18:01:51:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
18:08:41:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
18:08:41:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
18:08:41:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
18:08:42:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
18:08:42:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
18:19:47:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
18:19:56:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.200:8080': Empty work server assignment
18:19:56:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
18:19:57:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
18:19:57:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Top
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7937
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Joe_H »

Without any information as to the configuration of the system requesting work, no way of telling which server(s) are out. The empty WS messages from the assignment servers just means they can not match up your system's request with a WS that has appropriate WU's available. Besides 171.64.65.99 which your system just uploaded a WU to, what other WS addresses have assigned this system work in the recent past?
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Top
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Grandpa_01 »

Yea they got it going again and it only took 46 min. on a Saturday, Good Job :D

I thought it was supposed to switch automatically if a server was out of work ?

Code: Select all

18:38:30:WARNING:WU00:FS02:Failed to get assignment from '171.67.108.204:80': Empty work server assignment
18:38:30:ERROR:WU00:FS02:Exception: Could not get an assignment
18:45:21:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
18:45:21:WU00:FS02:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.99
18:45:21:WU00:FS02:Requesting new work unit for slot 02: READY cpu:31 from 171.64.65.99
18:45:21:WU00:FS02:Connecting to 171.64.65.99:8080
18:45:24:WU00:FS02:Downloading 6.24MiB
18:45:57:WU00:FS02:Download 11.01%
18:46:01:WU00:FS02:Download complete
18:46:01:WU00:FS02:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:9752 run:1682 clone:0 gen:341 core:0xa4 unit:0x000001b2ab404163554173e1a5defcd7
18:46:01:WU00:FS02:Starting
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Top
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Grandpa_01 »

Hmm maybe I spoke too soon it appears to be an intermittent problem and I only see 171.64.65.99:8080 2 more of the Linus SMP rigs have had problems looking back through the logs in the last hour or so.

edit
looking at the server log it looks like it may be having some trouble only 2 lines show up on the report in a couple of instances in the last hour or so. Port 80 appears to be missing in those.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Top
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by bruce »

[That message does not say there's an "empty work server" but rather that the list of servers to which you can be assigned is empty.

You probably need to remove/relax any settings which would tend to restrict your choices to a limited number of servers.
Top
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7937
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Joe_H »

There are a limited number of servers with work for larger numbers of CPU cores, and one has been temporarily restricted for assignments due to problems. 171.64.65.99 appears to be processing returned WU's and assigning the resulting next Gen WU's as fast as it is getting them in.

One issue in your configuration, it is requesting for 31 cores. As a large prime, that is always going to get adjusted down to 30 at least. You may get easier assignments if you set it to 30. Also, the last I checked, there are more assignments that top out at 24 cores than for more than that.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Top
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Grandpa_01 »

I am not running any restrictions at the moment I am guessing it is the server issue. I have not lost a single smp due to the 31 cores which is the default setting. Unfortunately running 1 bigadv or 3 smp slots get less PPD by quite a bit than running 2 on these big boxen and really is not worth the electricity, if the do not have enough to feed them that is fine I have done close to 2000 smp WU's in just under 3 weeks and I am only currently running 3 of the 7 rigs. I also know brilong was bringing some more big rigs online and that has probably put a strain on the system. I can see where that might be a problem since they are making most of the new WU's less friendly to bigger rigs in one way or another whether in points or lack of work. I will try 3 again if my ppd drops like it did before I will just use the bigger rigs for other projects, it is no big deal to me.

Thanks for the explanation it is appreciated. :)
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Top
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Grandpa_01 »

Well it looks like if you are on a bigger boxen it does not matter how many slots you run smp on you still get assigned to the same server. So even if a person wanted to run the 24 core limited WU's it is not going to happen.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Top
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by Grandpa_01 »

I did find a cure to the situation, I am now running both v6 and v7 of FAH I am able to run the bigadv or whatever you wish to call them on the H v6 which they run quite a bit faster on this version of v6 than they do on v7, and I run the GPU's on v7. It is a bit of a pain to have to install and run both v6 and v7 on a rig but it makes it worthwhile to run the MP boxen and relieves the pressure on the limited amount of regular smp wu's that will run on these rigs.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Top
rpmouton
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:09 pm
Hardware configuration: 1-MSI 990FXA-GD65V2 AM3+, AMD FX-8120 8-Core Black Edition-3.1 GHz, Mushkin Enhanced Blackline 8GB (2 x 4GB) 1600 MHz and ASUS GeForce GTX 550 Ti. Win 7 64x, 7.1x client with SMP and GPU slots ~14k ppd

2-ASUS M2NE-SLI AM2, AMD Phenom 4 @ 2.3 GHZ, 4 GB @ 800 MHz and ASUS GeForce GTX 550 Ti. Win Vista 64x, 7.1x client with SMP and GPU slots ~10k ppd

3-MSI 785GTM-E45 AM2+, AMD Phenom 4 Propus @ 3 GHZ, 4GB @ 800 MHZ, Win 7 64x, 7.1x client with SMP slots ~4k ppd

4-DELL 2950 Gen III, 2 Xeon E5405 Quad core @ 2GHz, 8 GB @ 669MHz, Ubuntu 12.04, 7.1 client with one SMP slot (bigadv) ~12k ppd
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by rpmouton »

Looking at this sad story that we have to run V6 to get WU´s otherwise nada..

I am just going to remove my CPU clients as they run out of work, so that others that do not GPU fold can process them.

Let us know when we should turn them back on
Roger
Top
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Contact toTOW

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by toTOW »

I had a few Empty work server errors too on machine with odd numbers of cores (SMP 7) ... we might be low on such type of work.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Top
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Contact toTOW

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by toTOW »

Quick update : I got a confirmation that Pande group is looking at this issue :)
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Top
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Contact toTOW

Re: Woops looks like we may have an empty work server

Post by toTOW »

Issue should be fixed after a reboot of a server hosting some SMP projects.

Please post if you're still having issues.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Issues with a specific server”