7640 & 7643
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:56 am
- Hardware configuration: ASUS P5K-E, Q6600/ 8 gig ram Win-7
2X ASUS z97-K 16 G Ram Win-7_64
7640 & 7643
picked up these 2 today; system is showing that it will take 25 hr 50 min to complete.
have never had a gpu wu take more than 5 hr.
both are running in the same box on a pair of GTX460 se's. does 25+ hrs. seem reasonable?
have never had a gpu wu take more than 5 hr.
both are running in the same box on a pair of GTX460 se's. does 25+ hrs. seem reasonable?
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: 7640 & 7643
WUs always get bigger, and that mantra has been repeated, repeatedly.
Yes, very reasonable, also noting the PG announcement about these projects going main stream.
Also, I don't think this is a V7 related issue.
See also http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f ... 77#p211806
Yes, very reasonable, also noting the PG announcement about these projects going main stream.
Also, I don't think this is a V7 related issue.
See also http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f ... 77#p211806
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Re: 7640 & 7643
As a comparison point, my stock GTX 460 (non-SE) has a 12:26 TPF for p7643. It takes almost 21 hours to complete one.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:34 am
- Hardware configuration: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula / AMD 1090T / 4X2 Gig GSkill Pi PC3-12800 / Corsair TX750W PSU / Sparkle GTX275 Plus / CoolerMaster Cosmos S / MCP655 WC Pump / MCR320 Rad / 6X Yate Loons / PA120.1 / 2X Scythe Ultra Kaze / Enzotech Luna WB / Dell Ultrasharp 2209WA
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 / Q6600 / 2X 1G 1066 Firestix / "Baked" XFX GTX 280 (RIP again :( ) / MSI GTS 450 Cyclone OC /PC P&C 750W Silencer / MCR220-QP-Res / DD DDCPX-Pro / Apogee GT / Highspeed PC Tech Station / Samsung 931BF / BenQ Q9T4 - Location: Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Re: 7640 & 7643
Yeah, my 560 ti cards are showing 10+ minutes TPF if it's any consolation.
PPD on these really bites as well especially when we were used to the high heat/PPD ones we just got through. Previous average was around 13K PPD, high average for the last batch was around 18K, these ones are coming in under 11K PPD.
PPD on these really bites as well especially when we were used to the high heat/PPD ones we just got through. Previous average was around 13K PPD, high average for the last batch was around 18K, these ones are coming in under 11K PPD.
Re: 7640 & 7643
Can somebody report the same information for a GTX 460 card?sswilson wrote:Yeah, my 560 ti cards are showing 10+ minutes TPF if it's any consolation.
PPD on these really bites as well especially when we were used to the high heat/PPD ones we just got through. Previous average was around 13K PPD, high average for the last batch was around 18K, these ones are coming in under 11K PPD.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: 7640 & 7643
On my GTX 460 running a P7643 I'm getting just under 9K PPD whereas on the P803x it was up around 13K. TPF=12:23
Re: 7640 & 7643
I'm getting 7143 PPD on a P8034 with lots of lag. (Win7-64 -- GTX460 non-SE) TPF=7:46. I'm not sure we can successfully generalize.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:34 am
- Hardware configuration: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula / AMD 1090T / 4X2 Gig GSkill Pi PC3-12800 / Corsair TX750W PSU / Sparkle GTX275 Plus / CoolerMaster Cosmos S / MCP655 WC Pump / MCR320 Rad / 6X Yate Loons / PA120.1 / 2X Scythe Ultra Kaze / Enzotech Luna WB / Dell Ultrasharp 2209WA
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 / Q6600 / 2X 1G 1066 Firestix / "Baked" XFX GTX 280 (RIP again :( ) / MSI GTS 450 Cyclone OC /PC P&C 750W Silencer / MCR220-QP-Res / DD DDCPX-Pro / Apogee GT / Highspeed PC Tech Station / Samsung 931BF / BenQ Q9T4 - Location: Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Re: 7640 & 7643
These figures are taken from what's reported by the beta client.....
560 ti @ 850 core
WU 7641 (245,0,1) / TPF 10 minutes 8 seconds / PPD 10953.27
WU 7644 (122,0,2) / TPF 9 Minutes 52 seconds / PPD 112 50.99
run on a 1090t @ 3.8 (smp on 4 cores, w/ 2 cores left open for GPU folding)
560 ti @ 900 Core
WU 7642 (130,0,1) / TPF 17 Minutes 25 Seconds / PPD 6381.14
GTS 450 @ 850 core
WU 7642 (437,0,0) / TPF 21 minutes 23 seconds / PPD 5194
Run on an athlon X2 @ 3.6
The output of the third 560 ti on the Athlon dual core is majorly nerfed which makes me wonder if these WUs are greatly affected by the system proc / memory interface.
edit: All three of these 560 ti cards (on the same systems they're currently on) were getting around 18K on the previous set of WUs (the extra hot ones.... ).
560 ti @ 850 core
WU 7641 (245,0,1) / TPF 10 minutes 8 seconds / PPD 10953.27
WU 7644 (122,0,2) / TPF 9 Minutes 52 seconds / PPD 112 50.99
run on a 1090t @ 3.8 (smp on 4 cores, w/ 2 cores left open for GPU folding)
560 ti @ 900 Core
WU 7642 (130,0,1) / TPF 17 Minutes 25 Seconds / PPD 6381.14
GTS 450 @ 850 core
WU 7642 (437,0,0) / TPF 21 minutes 23 seconds / PPD 5194
Run on an athlon X2 @ 3.6
The output of the third 560 ti on the Athlon dual core is majorly nerfed which makes me wonder if these WUs are greatly affected by the system proc / memory interface.
edit: All three of these 560 ti cards (on the same systems they're currently on) were getting around 18K on the previous set of WUs (the extra hot ones.... ).
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:50 am
- Hardware configuration: Geoforce 250 GTS Active for F@H
4 Core Intel not used at all for F@H - Location: England UK
Project: 7643 Low PPD
Is it possible to re-evaluate these please, I reckon these are losing me up-wards of 5000 PPD against the 80XX series WUs
Although the GPU is set @ 100% load. In MSI Afterburner it's showing only 97% load fortunately though, the temps are down to 63C
Project : 7643
Core : GPU3 OpenMM
Frames : 100
Credit : 7718
Although the GPU is set @ 100% load. In MSI Afterburner it's showing only 97% load fortunately though, the temps are down to 63C
Project : 7643
Core : GPU3 OpenMM
Frames : 100
Credit : 7718
Code: Select all
[16:36:09] Project: 7643 (Run 427, Clone 0, Gen 1) [16:36:09]
[16:36:09] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[16:36:09] Entering M.D.
[16:36:11] Tpr hash work/wudata_01.tpr: 387610028 1081406864 1851892430 3291987443 864452771
[16:36:11] GPU device info: vendor=0 device=0 name=<NA> match=0
[16:36:12] Working on Protein in water
[16:36:12] Client config found, loading data.
[16:36:12] Starting GUI Server
[16:37:39] Setting checkpoint frequency: 25000
[16:37:39] Completed 3 out of 2500000 steps (0%).
[16:43:46] Completed 25000 out of 2500000 steps (1%).
[16:49:59] Completed 50000 out of 2500000 steps (2%).
[16:56:08] Completed 75000 out of 2500000 steps (3%).
[17:02:22] Completed 100000 out of 2500000 steps (4%).
[17:08:38] Completed 125000 out of 2500000 steps (5%).
[17:14:47] Completed 150000 out of 2500000 steps (6%).
[17:20:55] Completed 175000 out of 2500000 steps (7%).
[17:27:06] Completed 200000 out of 2500000 steps (8%).
[17:33:21] Completed 225000 out of 2500000 steps (9%).
[17:39:31] Completed 250000 out of 2500000 steps (10%).
[17:45:42] Completed 275000 out of 2500000 steps (11%).
[17:51:52] Completed 300000 out of 2500000 steps (12%).
[17:58:03] Completed 325000 out of 2500000 steps (13%).
[18:04:15] Completed 350000 out of 2500000 steps (14%).
[18:10:27] Completed 375000 out of 2500000 steps (15%).
[18:16:39] Completed 400000 out of 2500000 steps (16%).
[18:22:51] Completed 425000 out of 2500000 steps (17%).
[18:29:03] Completed 450000 out of 2500000 steps (18%).
[18:35:17] Completed 475000 out of 2500000 steps (19%).
[18:41:30] Completed 500000 out of 2500000 steps (20%).
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:16 am
- Hardware configuration: AMD PhenomII 1100T x6 3.8Ghz (OC, turbo off, stock volts)
Koolance CPU-370 (Liquid cooler)
ASUS Crosshair V Formula AM3+
3x EVGA GTX 480 HC FTW
8Gb DDR3 1600 GSkill
240Gb OCZ Vertex 3 (Boot Windows 7)
3Tb Seagate Baracuda (Storage)
2x optical, 1 DVD Burner, 1 BD ROM
PCP&C 910 Silencer, OCZ ZX 800Watt (Powering 2x GTX 480)
Swifttech MCP35x2 (full speed), 1/2" tubing
Black Ice GT Stealth 240 Radiator (2x120mm for CPU)
Fester 360 (3x120 additional cooling for 1x GPU)
Black Ice GT Xtreme 420 Radiator (3x140mm for GPU)
Distilled Water, 1oz silver in the reservoir, and a few drops of copper sulphate.
Bitspower Water Tank Z-Multi 400 Inline Reservoir
Loop = Res, Pump, CPU, Rad, GPU1, Rad, GPU2, GPU3, Rad, Res.
Re: 7640 & 7643
I know that I'm not running one of those two projects, but I got a 7642 today also 21443 atoms, and it says that my tpf is 9mins and it'll take 15hrs to complete on my GTX 480
Project Summary is giving 13 days for preferred deadline and 7718 points
I'm also not getting 100% GPU usage, hovering at 70~80%
I would think that if the projects were adjusted slightly - the GPU could be better utilized (100%).
Project Summary is giving 13 days for preferred deadline and 7718 points
I'm also not getting 100% GPU usage, hovering at 70~80%
I would think that if the projects were adjusted slightly - the GPU could be better utilized (100%).
I fold for the Cure, not just because I've had family pass because of cancer.
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
- Hardware configuration: Machine #1:
Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).
Machine #2:
Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.
Machine 3:
Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32
I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD - Location: Salem. OR USA
Re: 7640 & 7643
I was getting 7,800 PPD on GTX 460's (800MHz - 825MHz clocks) running p764x; I get 11,000+ running p762x; I get 14,000+ running p803x. This seems to be relatively consistent across multiple cards running on multiple machines.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:50 am
- Hardware configuration: Geoforce 250 GTS Active for F@H
4 Core Intel not used at all for F@H - Location: England UK
Re: 7640 & 7643
This is how the current WU scoring system seems to be working here.
On the assumption of a static bench mark PC, I’d be very interested in knowing just how the differences stack up?
Project 7643 in 10.566 hours = 7718 Points
Versus 80xx in 4.02 Hrs = 3843 Points
80xx in 4.02 Hrs = 3843 Points X 2
Therefore I can Fold 2 X 80xx = 7686 Points
With 2.57 Hours to spare
Come on Stanford please get the PPD right
On the assumption of a static bench mark PC, I’d be very interested in knowing just how the differences stack up?
Project 7643 in 10.566 hours = 7718 Points
Versus 80xx in 4.02 Hrs = 3843 Points
80xx in 4.02 Hrs = 3843 Points X 2
Therefore I can Fold 2 X 80xx = 7686 Points
With 2.57 Hours to spare
Come on Stanford please get the PPD right
Re: 7640 & 7643
I have only heard people complaining about these. What card were they benchmarked on that the ppd stayed the same as the 80xx work units?
single 1070
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:34 am
- Hardware configuration: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula / AMD 1090T / 4X2 Gig GSkill Pi PC3-12800 / Corsair TX750W PSU / Sparkle GTX275 Plus / CoolerMaster Cosmos S / MCP655 WC Pump / MCR320 Rad / 6X Yate Loons / PA120.1 / 2X Scythe Ultra Kaze / Enzotech Luna WB / Dell Ultrasharp 2209WA
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 / Q6600 / 2X 1G 1066 Firestix / "Baked" XFX GTX 280 (RIP again :( ) / MSI GTS 450 Cyclone OC /PC P&C 750W Silencer / MCR220-QP-Res / DD DDCPX-Pro / Apogee GT / Highspeed PC Tech Station / Samsung 931BF / BenQ Q9T4 - Location: Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Re: 7640 & 7643
I believe Stanford has typically applied a "30%" possible range on what PPD might be expected, and believe it or not, these come close to being 30% below recent standards. What's making them look soooooo bad is the fact that we just got through a batch of WUs which were providing PPD well over 30% above what has been the standard.
I'd like to see a more consistant PPD being applied, but am willing to cut Stanford some slack on this one.
I'd like to see a more consistant PPD being applied, but am willing to cut Stanford some slack on this one.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:50 am
- Hardware configuration: Geoforce 250 GTS Active for F@H
4 Core Intel not used at all for F@H - Location: England UK
Re: 7640 & 7643
Is that sort of like a 60% divide? I guess I've been participating in F@H since 2003-4ish and am still unsure where the middle line is.
I certainly wouldn't expect a computer to allow any deviation when using Excel to keep tabbs on my incoming and out goings.
I certainly wouldn't expect a computer to allow any deviation when using Excel to keep tabbs on my incoming and out goings.