re 171.67.108.142

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
kencode
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:19 am

re 171.67.108.142

Post by kencode »

I have 9 machines (all GTX gpu) trying for work here for the last 36 hours.

Pls advise how to change to a new server.

KRC
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by bruce »

The server log shows that it has been operational for the last 36 hours. Can you open http://171.67.108.142:8080 in your browser? I can, but the secondary interface http://171.67.108.142:80 seems to be down -- but that seems to have been true for a long time so nothing changed 36 hours ago.

Also, there are other servers with WUs for you GPU, and I don't know why you wouldn't have been redirected to them. Please post a recent segment of your log, plus the first page or two.
kencode
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:19 am

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by kencode »

I can open 8080 but 80 is rejected.
MtM
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by MtM »

I can confirm port 80 is not working.
Carl Mikkelsen
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:04 pm

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by Carl Mikkelsen »

I am having the same problem.

My configuration is Windows 7 with an i7 CPU and two graphic cards.

From another forum, it seemed prudent to upgrade to the V7 beta client, but the problem is the same. A snippet from the log follows:
16:43:37:WU01:FS00:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
16:43:37:WU01:FS00:News: Welcome to Folding@Home
16:43:37:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.67.108.142
16:43:38:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:0:"GF116 [GeForce GTX 550 Ti]" from 171.67.108.142
16:43:38:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.142:8080
16:43:45:WU03:FS01:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
16:43:46:WU03:FS01:News: Welcome to Folding@Home
16:43:46:WU03:FS01:Assigned to work server 171.67.108.142
16:43:46:WU03:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: READY gpu:1:"GF116 [GeForce GTX 550 Ti]" from 171.67.108.142
16:43:46:WU03:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.142:8080
16:43:59:WARNING:WU01:FS00:WorkServer connection failed on port 8080 trying 80
16:43:59:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.142:80
16:44:00:ERROR:WU01:FS00:Exception: 10001: Server responded: HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
16:44:07:WARNING:WU03:FS01:WorkServer connection failed on port 8080 trying 80
16:44:07:WU03:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.142:80
16:44:09:ERROR:WU03:FS01:Exception: 10001: Server responded: HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
GreyWhiskers
Posts: 660
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:57 am
Hardware configuration: a) Main unit
Sandybridge in HAF922 w/200 mm side fan
--i7 [email protected] GHz
--ASUS P8P67 DeluxeB3
--4GB ADATA 1600 RAM
--750W Corsair PS
--2Seagate Hyb 750&500 GB--WD Caviar Black 1TB
--EVGA 660GTX-Ti FTW - Signature 2 GPU@ 1241 Boost
--MSI GTX560Ti @900MHz
--Win7Home64; FAH V7.3.2; 327.23 drivers

b) 2004 HP a475c desktop, 1 core Pent 4 [email protected] GHz; Mem 2GB;HDD 160 GB;Zotac GT430PCI@900 MHz
WinXP SP3-32 FAH v7.3.6 301.42 drivers - GPU slot only

c) 2005 Toshiba M45-S551 laptop w/2 GB mem, 160GB HDD;Pent M 740 CPU @ 1.73 GHz
WinXP SP3-32 FAH v7.3.6 [Receiving Core A4 work units]
d) 2011 lappy-15.6"-1920x1080;i7-2860QM,2.5;IC Diamond Thermal Compound;GTX 560M 1,536MB u/c@700;16GB-1333MHz RAM;HDD:500GBHyb w/ 4GB SSD;Win7HomePrem64;320.18 drivers FAH 7.4.2ß
Location: Saratoga, California USA

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by GreyWhiskers »

This server is one of those involved in the 803x GPU projects that so many posts lately have come in on. [sorry for the dangling participles]

It seems that each of the projects 8031, 8032 and 8033 have their own server.

BTW, by the server stats for these three servers, these projects all have the highest weighting of any of the GPU servers - the A is for ADVANCED, the B is BETA, and the F is normal FAH. So, this will drive virtually all Type 3 GPU (Fermi, presumably) assignments to these servers and therefore projects 803x, if I read the tea leaves in the server stats page correctly. I've included a fuzzy image of the server stats page - but showing the very high % assignments (the last three rows are the ones we are talking about). And, two of these servers, at the moment the snapshot was taken, didn't have any WUs available.
W_10000_A_8080G;
W_10000_B_8080G;
W_10000_F_8080G

Code: Select all

8031	171.67.108.141	p8031	1832	9.86	13.78	3843.40	100	OPENMMGPU	Description	shukla	0.00
8032	171.67.108.142	p8032	1832	9.86	13.78	3843.40	100	OPENMMGPU	Description	shukla	0.00
8033	171.67.108.143	p8033	1832	9.86	13.78	3843.40	100	OPENMMGPU	Description	shukla	0.00
Image
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by bruce »

For those three servers, the current information is:
3496 3496 3496 - - 6
1426 1426 1426 - - 3
8622 8622 8622 - - 3
diwakar
Pande Group Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:05 am

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by diwakar »

I am running projects 803x on FAH. I have just fixed the port 80 issue. Let me know if you are still not able to get assignments.

I am really sorry for any inconvenience caused to the donors.

Thanks,
Diwakar
Carl Mikkelsen
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:04 pm

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by Carl Mikkelsen »

Problem has been fixed, at least for me. I have received new assignments.

Interesting that the V7 client(s) work the GPUs much harder. My temp went up several degrees, and total system power increased enough to trip the undersized UPS.
diwakar
Pande Group Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:05 am

Re: re 171.67.108.142

Post by diwakar »

It is not about the v7 client but the size of the systems that we are trying to simulate on GPUs. These WU's will push the machine harder and get 100% out of it.

Thanks again for your quick feedback.
Post Reply