Dear FAH Management,
For many years (8 to be precise) I have lead a team in respect to contribute to research for HD and other diseases.
I translated almost the whole FAH website into Dutch in 2008 to help to get some more new folders.
I doubt if the attention for HD is big enough at Stanford, but maybe I am wrong.
Our team,that used have 143 members slimmed down to 4 hardcore folders, because motivation died out.
We are about to give up...............Is it still usefull in respect of the above to spend so much money folding, by families and individuals who often have a low income due to HD?
The last (and only?) paper about HD, if i am correct, is the one in 2009 and I get the idea that it is an Alzheimer's priority research project now.
Do you have, or intend to start any, Huntington's research or do you have any papers in the pipeline?
Do you intend to renew the project information wise and ways of working for example: a possible choise what disease you want to be folding for , in respect of those costs?
VijayPande wrote:In terms of big picture highlights, we spent the first 5-6 years working out how to use distributed computing to efficiently tackle protein folding and then applying it to do the first simulations of protein folding reaching the folded state with experimental validation, etc. This was one of our primary goals laid out in the Science section and we're excited to have accomplished that. Part of our work today involves continuing in that direction with more complex systems, continuing to push the state of the art.
The other part of our work is to apply these methods to study disease, especially Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Huntington's Disease (HD). We are interested in understanding what's going on in these diseases to facilitate a cure. Indeed, our motto in big letters on our web page is "Our goal: to understand protein folding, misfolding, and related diseases," and we are on track for that. One could ask "how do you know if you understand the disease?" A good answer is new small molecule drugs which appear to prevent or minimize the effects of the disease. This too is in the works, with encouraging results in the lab (but it's not time to talk about this publicly until it passes peer review).
However, it takes a long time (often as much as 2-3 years) from the point where we have something interesting in the lab to where we are talking about the results publicly (it has to be validated by ourselves and go through peer review). Our first results on AD and HD will hopefully be coming out soon, i.e. in the next 6 to 12 months or so.
Finally as for a cure -- a cure takes a while to test and develop. First, one has to understand what's going on and that's where basic science comes in and most of what FAH does. However, we and others are excited to take the published results from FAH and apply them to real world problems such as AD and HD and our expectation is that our work could give some critical insights into these diseases, thereby helping to accelerate a cure.
Thanks for your full attention!
Hans van der Leer (team 46113)