Not in stats (yet)?
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:27 pm
Not in stats (yet)?
Hello everyone.
Today I decided to put a few my servers (each has 8x 2GHZ, 32GB ram) to work for folding@home for a few weeks.
Now just out of curiosity, I went to the userstats page and entered my username.
However, it did not find anything.
Is this because the page needs updating, or did I do something wrong?
CPU usage is 16 GHZ all the time, so it definitely is doing something.
I installed it at like 16:00 (GMT+1) today.
Thnx.
Today I decided to put a few my servers (each has 8x 2GHZ, 32GB ram) to work for folding@home for a few weeks.
Now just out of curiosity, I went to the userstats page and entered my username.
However, it did not find anything.
Is this because the page needs updating, or did I do something wrong?
CPU usage is 16 GHZ all the time, so it definitely is doing something.
I installed it at like 16:00 (GMT+1) today.
Thnx.
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
- Hardware configuration: Machine #1:
Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).
Machine #2:
Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.
Machine 3:
Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32
I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD - Location: Salem. OR USA
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
To get into the stat system, you need to have returned a work unit (WU) and then it will commonly take 1-3 hours after that to get into the stat system. Since you just installed folding today, my guess is that you haven't returned a WU yet. You can see the folding log by looking at the FAHLOG.txt file. When you have successfully returned a WU the log will say "Thank you for your contribution".
The things I don't understand is a question of your terminology. Do you actually have eight physical servers (computers) running or is it one computer with eight cores? You say you have a CPU usage of 16GHz running all the time and I don't know of any CPU usage meters that use GHz as their performance metric. The ones I know of return a percent usage so while folding it should be reporting a 100% rather than a GHz number. Are you using the Windows Task Manager to monitor your CPU usage or something else?
The things I don't understand is a question of your terminology. Do you actually have eight physical servers (computers) running or is it one computer with eight cores? You say you have a CPU usage of 16GHz running all the time and I don't know of any CPU usage meters that use GHz as their performance metric. The ones I know of return a percent usage so while folding it should be reporting a 100% rather than a GHz number. Are you using the Windows Task Manager to monitor your CPU usage or something else?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:27 pm
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
Thanks for the info about the stats.
Answer to your tech question: It is a virtual linux server to which I assigned 8 cpu's. Each cpu has 2 GHZ.
I use vSphere to see advanced stats of the machine.
I also decided to lower the ram from 32GB to 16GB since almost none is used:
Here is some info when I start the folding@home application
Here is some info I get when I stop the folding@home application
WHoo I also completed a WU
Why are the upload rates this low (1529 kB/s)? I have a gigabit connection and I normally upload 20MB (thats megabyte) per second
Its running for like half a day now.
I will keep it running for a week or so, and probably even add 1-3 more of these machine's (each again has 8x2GHZ and 16GB ram).
I dont need my computing resources right now, so I decided to 'donate' them for folding@home .
Answer to your tech question: It is a virtual linux server to which I assigned 8 cpu's. Each cpu has 2 GHZ.
I use vSphere to see advanced stats of the machine.
I also decided to lower the ram from 32GB to 16GB since almost none is used:
Code: Select all
~# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 16090 356 15734 0 133 48
-/+ buffers/cache: 173 15916
Swap: 5122 0 5122
Code: Select all
8 cores detected
...
[15:42:22] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[15:42:22] Entering M.D.
Starting 8 threads
NNODES=8, MYRANK=7, HOSTNAME=thread #7
NNODES=8, MYRANK=4, HOSTNAME=thread #4
NNODES=8, MYRANK=1, HOSTNAME=thread #1
NNODES=8, MYRANK=5, HOSTNAME=thread #5
NNODES=8, MYRANK=3, HOSTNAME=thread #3
NNODES=8, MYRANK=2, HOSTNAME=thread #2
NNODES=8, MYRANK=6, HOSTNAME=thread #6
NNODES=8, MYRANK=0, HOSTNAME=thread #0
Code: Select all
Received the TERM signal, stopping at the next NS step
Average load imbalance: 0.3 %
Part of the total run time spent waiting due to load imbalance: 0.1 %
Steps where the load balancing was limited by -rdd, -rcon and/or -dds: X 0 %
Parallel run - timing based on wallclock.
NODE (s) Real (s) (%)
Time: 21700.191 21700.191 100.0
6h01:40
(Mnbf/s) (GFlops) (ns/day) (hour/ns)
Performance: 251.579 16.572 3.559 6.743
Thanx for Using GROMACS - Have a Nice Day
Code: Select all
[22:28:10] Finished Work Unit:
[22:28:10] - Reading up to 20265168 from "work/wudata_01.trr": Read 20265168
[22:28:10] trr file hash check passed.
[22:28:10] edr file hash check passed.
[22:28:10] logfile size: 65320
[22:28:10] Leaving Run
[22:28:13] - Writing 20364764 bytes of core data to disk...
[22:28:14] ... Done.
[22:28:19] - Shutting down core
[22:28:19]
[22:28:19] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[22:28:19] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[22:28:19] Unit 1 finished with 95 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[22:28:19] Updated performance fraction: 0.951265
[22:28:19] Sending work to server
[22:28:19] Project: 6025 (Run 1, Clone 29, Gen 326)
[22:28:19] + Attempting to send results [January 18 22:28:19 UTC]
[22:28:19] - Reading file work/wuresults_01.dat from core
[22:28:19] (Read 20364764 bytes from disk)
[22:28:19] Connecting to http://171.64.65.54:8080/
[22:28:31] Posted data.
[22:28:31] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~1529 kB/s
[22:28:32] - Averaged speed for that direction ~1529 kB/s
[22:28:32] + Results successfully sent
[22:28:32] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
Its running for like half a day now.
I will keep it running for a week or so, and probably even add 1-3 more of these machine's (each again has 8x2GHZ and 16GB ram).
I dont need my computing resources right now, so I decided to 'donate' them for folding@home .
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
Welcome to the fold
It's probably not your end of the link that is the bottleneck, rather more likely to be Stanford's end - which has to be shared across thousands of users simultaneously uploading and/or downloading. I'm sure they've got a very big pipe, it's just likely to be being shared across many many users and 1500kB/s isn't too slow, just not quite gigabit
Plus it's only taking 10 seconds to upload, some of that could just be negotiation time...
It's probably not your end of the link that is the bottleneck, rather more likely to be Stanford's end - which has to be shared across thousands of users simultaneously uploading and/or downloading. I'm sure they've got a very big pipe, it's just likely to be being shared across many many users and 1500kB/s isn't too slow, just not quite gigabit
Plus it's only taking 10 seconds to upload, some of that could just be negotiation time...
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:27 pm
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
Haha ok.
Sounds fair to me
PS. download rates are even worse, 800kb/sec? stone age...
I now completed 2 WU's and I was awarded 964 points.
I also see other people that completed 15 WU's and only have 762 points.
Is this because my WU's are harder or smth like that?
Sounds fair to me
PS. download rates are even worse, 800kb/sec? stone age...
I now completed 2 WU's and I was awarded 964 points.
I also see other people that completed 15 WU's and only have 762 points.
Is this because my WU's are harder or smth like that?
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
Different work units are worth different amounts of points as they are different sizes.
Also, the uniprocessor client earns much less points than the SMP client (which is able to utilise much more powerful computers), but in turn, they require much less computing to complete.
If you are using the SMP client, make sure you're folding with a passkey, as once you've completed 10 work units and maintain an 80% success rate, you'll earn bonus points, which will significantly increase your points. The bonus points are designed to encourage fast, stable work unit completion.
Also, the uniprocessor client earns much less points than the SMP client (which is able to utilise much more powerful computers), but in turn, they require much less computing to complete.
If you are using the SMP client, make sure you're folding with a passkey, as once you've completed 10 work units and maintain an 80% success rate, you'll earn bonus points, which will significantly increase your points. The bonus points are designed to encourage fast, stable work unit completion.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:27 pm
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
Aahh
I will add a passkey.
How can I reconfigure the SMP client to use the passkey?
I know I can request a passkey online. But how do I add it to my already installed linux SMP client?
(I did not enter one during the installation setup)
Another question:
Can you actually do anything with these points? Or are they just for fun
I will add a passkey.
How can I reconfigure the SMP client to use the passkey?
I know I can request a passkey online. But how do I add it to my already installed linux SMP client?
(I did not enter one during the installation setup)
Another question:
Can you actually do anything with these points? Or are they just for fun
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
Once you get your passkey close the client with ctrl-C (I think for linux) and then restart with the flag -config, this will run the config upon restart, where you can enter your passkey.
The points are just so you can measure your contribution against the masses, or your contribution to your team... 'Stacking the deck' with bonus points helps, but if points aren't of interest then the passkey is less of an issue - the same amount of science gets done
The points are just so you can measure your contribution against the masses, or your contribution to your team... 'Stacking the deck' with bonus points helps, but if points aren't of interest then the passkey is less of an issue - the same amount of science gets done
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:27 pm
Re: Not in stats (yet)?
Thanks for the answer.
Ye point are funny, but the real reason for donating is to do something good .
Ye point are funny, but the real reason for donating is to do something good .