Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
kitsura
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:13 pm

Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Post by kitsura »

[06:28:08] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[06:28:08] + Attempting to get work packet
[06:28:08] - Will indicate memory of 500 MB
[06:28:08] - Connecting to assignment server
[06:28:08] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[06:28:09] Posted data.
[06:28:09] Initial: 40AB; - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.56).
[06:28:09] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[06:28:09] Loaded queue successfully.
[06:28:09] Connecting to http://171.64.65.56:8080/
[06:28:18] Posted data.
[06:28:18] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 7865244)
[06:37:19] - Downloaded at ~14 kB/s
[06:37:19] - Averaged speed for that direction ~10 kB/s
[06:37:19] + Received work.
[06:37:19] Trying to send all finished work units
[06:37:19] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[06:37:19] + Closed connections
[06:37:19]
[06:37:19] + Processing work unit
[06:37:19] Core required: FahCore_a2.exe
[06:37:19] Core found.
[06:37:19] Working on Unit 05 [March 29 06:37:19]
[06:37:19] + Working ...
[06:37:19] - Calling './mpiexec -np 4 -host 127.0.0.1 ./FahCore_a2.exe -dir work/ -suffix 05 -priority 96 -checkpoint 15 -forceasm -verbose -lifeline 5611 -version 602'

[06:37:20]
[06:37:20] *------------------------------*
[06:37:20] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[06:37:20] Version 1.91 (2007)
[06:37:21]
[06:37:21] Preparing to commence simulation
[06:37:21] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[06:37:37] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[06:37:37] - Not checking prior termination.
[06:37:37] Error: Work unit read from disk is invalid
[06:37:37] Finalizing output
[06:37:43] - Expanded 7864732 -> 48331685 (decompressed 68.4 percent)
[06:37:45]
[06:37:45] Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)
[06:37:45]
[06:38:10] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[06:38:10] Entering M.D.
[06:38:54] CoreStatus = 0 (0)
[06:38:56] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0x0
[06:38:56] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
[06:43:52] - Warning: Could not delete all work unit files (5): Core file absent
I keep getting this error and my client will continue looping until I delete the WU and another gets assigned.
ChasR
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:36 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Post by ChasR »

If you're running this in a VM and have 512 MB or less dedicated to the VM and accepted the default swap space in the guest OS (Ubuntu 7.10 anyway), you'll lose the WU with the error you report.
Image
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Post by toTOW »

Two questions :

- how many RAM do you have (and that the client can use) ?
- what's your CPU ?
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
él Mero
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:14 pm

Re: Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Post by él Mero »

All reports I have seen about this error have showed a problem with the WU and nothing else; client, memory assignment or anything like that. I think your time will be better spent working on another WU, but don't take my word for it. Hopefully a more knowledgeable mind will enlighten us.
dschief
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:56 am
Hardware configuration: ASUS P5K-E, Q6600/ 8 gig ram Win-7

2X ASUS z97-K 16 G Ram Win-7_64

Re: Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Post by dschief »

there has been talk about this Wu in another thread; it's definately a memory hog. I have 3 of the 2619's running now
all on C2D E6400 with 2 Gig. mem. All are showing memory usage around 956 meg. Counting additional overhead
I doubt you'll get a successful completion with anything less than 1 gig. dedicated to the client.
kitsura
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:13 pm

Re: Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Post by kitsura »

Yes I'm running it on VM but in the client I've indicated only 500MB free of RAM so why am I still getting assigned this WU.

And since I've only got 2GB of RAM I'm not about to assign 1GB just for the VM.

CPU: E8200 @ 3.2GHz
RAM: 512MB
OS: Ubuntu 7.10
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 2619 (Run 7, Clone 592, Gen 0)

Post by toTOW »

I really don't see the point in running a VM on a dual core ... :shock:
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Post Reply