Search found 149 matches
- Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:05 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Another GPU just showed up...
- Replies: 32
- Views: 9007
Re: Another GPU just showed up...
I was surprised to see that iGPU slot added after debugging core interrupted issues happening since a few days (Basically deleted everything and reinstalled). I have a i7-8750H with that exact Intel UHD Graphics 630. Itself never managed to get any work so i set pause-on-start to True for the meanwh...
- Wed May 06, 2020 2:33 pm
- Forum: V7.6.x Public Release Windows/Linux/MacOS X
- Topic: Webclient - Incorrect amount of points shown
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1921
Re: Webclient - Incorrect amount of points shown
Thanks for creating the enhancement request, that would be good for old timers like us.
- Tue May 05, 2020 6:58 pm
- Forum: V7.6.x Public Release Windows/Linux/MacOS X
- Topic: Webclient - Incorrect amount of points shown
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1921
Re: Webclient - Incorrect amount of points shown
AFAIK, back in those days, not all WUs were QRB eligible thus, they didn't have the passkey attached to them which would explain why they don't show up when searching with the passkey/username combination. Yes that's right. I remember the first days of QRB bonus and I got about 1.55 million with th...
- Tue May 05, 2020 2:38 pm
- Forum: V7.6.x Public Release Windows/Linux/MacOS X
- Topic: Webclient - Incorrect amount of points shown
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1921
Re: Webclient - Incorrect amount of points shown
I had the same problem and it really sucks because I'm folding since may 2005 and for as far back as I remember, I always used a passkey but it only show 2.5 million out of 35 million points I had since 2005...
- Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:16 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: where do you need more help ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1335
Re: where do you need more help ?
Do note that while the PPD for the Classic Client is significantly less* than that of SMP2, it still does some very important scientific work that even the SMP2/GPU can't do. If you are interested in the type of F@h Clients available and their "target audience" I would suggest that you re...
- Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:11 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Folding pratices guideline
- Replies: 32
- Views: 11282
Re: Folding pratices guideline
Since there are no changes or comments, I'll submit this to the PG.
- Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:43 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Folding pratices guideline
- Replies: 32
- Views: 11282
Re: Folding pratices guideline
IMHO, the guidelines will still be very useful even with the v7 clients. At most, we might have to edit them to follow the new trends but the core of the guidelines is there to stay. bruce summed it very well and I don't think it's a waste of time. With no new feedback to add, I think this set is co...
- Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:48 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Folding pratices guideline
- Replies: 32
- Views: 11282
Re: Folding pratices guideline
I have added a reference to a new source about deleting wu : viewtopic.php?p=164798#p164798. I have asked Vijay to make a statement to have a hardwritten reference. So far, I believe we are almost done so if after some days, nothing is added, I would strongly suggest you circulate this on all teams ...
- Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:21 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Why deleting a work unit is bad
- Replies: 32
- Views: 13566
Re: Why deleting a work unit is bad
You need a comment from PG saying that dumping WUs is bad? One would think the obvious logic of reality would suffice. Dumping a WU slows things down while we wait for that WU to expire and get reassigned. It can result in a delay of several months in the larger CPU WUs. :roll: But when logic escap...
- Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:13 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Why deleting a work unit is bad
- Replies: 32
- Views: 13566
Re: Why deleting a work unit is bad
Anyone ?
- Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:53 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Folding pratices guideline
- Replies: 32
- Views: 11282
Re: Folding pratices guideline
Thanks to everyone and especially PantherX for the comments and updates. The guidelines is shaping up to be a excellent reference for anyone having doubts about the best pratices and what is forbidden. About running SMP on 2-core systems or bigadv on 4C/8T systems, if the client allow it, it's permi...
- Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:05 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Folding pratices guideline
- Replies: 32
- Views: 11282
Re: Folding pratices guideline
Question Xilikon: the reference and link to the EULA update blog post were the same for items 2 and 3. Was this intentional? Yes, it was intentional since both refer to the same issue at the base, which is the distribution of F@H files by yourself. In addition, point 2 is about illegal installation...
- Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:06 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Folding pratices guideline
- Replies: 32
- Views: 11282
Folding pratices guideline
This is in response to the recent events about a folder admitting of running a script to block unwanted workunits from being downloaded. Lots of comments defending him argue there are no defined set of rules against them. For them, no rules = not forbidden. The PG admitted the current problem is cau...
- Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:29 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Why deleting a work unit is bad
- Replies: 32
- Views: 13566
Why deleting a work unit is bad
I know it's bad to delete a work unit in progress. However, I failed to see evidence about the reasons why it's bad... All I know that work units is created in a sequential fashion and deleting one will cause a delay for the next ones.
Is there are links from the PG commenting on them ?
Is there are links from the PG commenting on them ?
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:59 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Open letter to PG [with response]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 13647
Re: What PG respond to that?
Thanks for taking your time replying to the concerns outlined by the OP. This will show to everyone what you are working to improve on those issues and I'm sure it will get better and better with time (you are already on the right path since 2-3 years).