Search found 138 matches
- Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:32 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Classic Server Responding to GPU - Error: Bad packet type fr
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1145
Classic Server Responding to GPU - Error: Bad packet type fr
One of my 6.23 gpu clients is trying to get a new work unit and has been assigned 171.64.65.71 which is a classic server according to the Server Status page. [22:33:09] Completed 20000000 out of 20000000 steps (100%). [22:33:09] Finished fah_main status=0 [22:33:09] Successful run [22:33:09] Dynamic...
- Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:03 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.71 assigning Core 65 to GPU clients
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7315
Re: 171.64.65.71 assigning Core 65 to GPU clients
Good call, that got them back to Core 11,,, for now.pwnchu wrote:Deleting the WU/queue seems to be solving the problem for now.
- Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:49 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.71 assigning Core 65 to GPU clients
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7315
Re: 171.64.65.71 assigning Core 65 to GPU clients
I have the same problem.
Currently have 5 gpu2 clients down.
Currently have 5 gpu2 clients down.
- Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:12 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.56 ???
- Replies: 141
- Views: 54292
Re: 171.64.65.56 ???
Same problems here. 10-50kbps upload, stalls and fails on upload.
- Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:08 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.56 ???
- Replies: 141
- Views: 54292
Re: 171.64.65.56 ???
Same here,,,, sightoTOW wrote:My SMP client is stuck on this server trying to get work ... all it gets is a 503 error ...

- Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:27 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.11
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1551
Re: 171.67.108.11
It's been sick the last couple of hours. Same problems as you.
- Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:19 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.56
- Replies: 44
- Views: 18058
Re: 171.64.65.56
I'm sure tear will jump in here, but from my experience with it, Langouste doesn't appear to open any more connections than the standard client does. The main client's initial connection to upload a completed WU never makes it to the server because Langouste interrupts it (by using a proxy port, I ...
- Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:25 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.56
- Replies: 44
- Views: 18058
Re: 171.64.65.56
From what I saw of Langoueste, it does not try to send data any more than the the client itself. If it can't upload it waits for the client to try again in 6 hours. It's only function from what I could see was to immediately download a new workunit while trying to upload the last. It uses the -send ...
- Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:57 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.56
- Replies: 44
- Views: 18058
Re: 171.64.65.56
The last few days have been particularly bad.
Between 171.67.108.25 and 171.64.65.56 getting 503's and only occasionally completing an upload, and -send rarely working I've had to do a lot of restarts to get anything uploaded.
Between 171.67.108.25 and 171.64.65.56 getting 503's and only occasionally completing an upload, and -send rarely working I've had to do a lot of restarts to get anything uploaded.
- Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:44 am
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
- Replies: 173
- Views: 166798
Re: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
I have it running on 5 smp's now and 2 just uploaded fine. .56 appears to be the culprit, and I've certainly had more trouble with that server than the rest combined. If the upload does fail, do you have a retry built in or will it wait for the autosend? This is a slick program, I was able to fold 6...
- Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:58 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
- Replies: 173
- Views: 166798
Re: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
I think 200 is pretty high.
I stopped and restarted the client and it uploaded just fine.
Thanks for the help.
I've set Langouste up on another machine that failed when I first tried it last week. It's due in about 30 minutes. I'll let you know what happens.
I stopped and restarted the client and it uploaded just fine.

Thanks for the help.
I've set Langouste up on another machine that failed when I first tried it last week. It's due in about 30 minutes. I'll let you know what happens.
- Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:43 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
- Replies: 173
- Views: 166798
Re: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
Thanks for the quick response! Here's the log file. Mon 08/09/2010 01:45 PM Checking WU 00 Checking WU 01 Checking WU 02 Checking WU 03 Checking WU 04 Launching: C:\FAH-Win\fah6.exe -local -verbosity 9 -send 04 Note: Please read the license agreement (fah6.exe -license). Further use of this software...
- Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:10 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
- Replies: 173
- Views: 166798
Re: Langouste -- WU upload/download de-coupler (+upload capping)
I tried Langouste3-0.15.5 on an XP32 machine running an SMP client (6.29) and get errors when it's trying to upload. The smp client downloads the new project and takes off like it should. Here's a copy of the langouste screen: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft...
- Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:51 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: General problem with Stanford Servers?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2790
Re: General problem with Stanford Servers?
Lots of hand tending this morning, having to manually restart gpu clients hung while trying to download from 171.67.108.20 and 21.
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:08 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5679
Re: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
Hadn't checked my PPD for a week, but I can see a 30k PPD drop off since the 5th. I have 5 machines running these so it would seem that at 6k per day per machine that we're not getting credit. Can't be 100% certain as there's no longer any way of checking the number of WU's on each project. Pete Do...