Folding Forum

The new SSD is an M.2 NVMe. After all, M.2 is just another PCIe slot form factor and strangely, it seems to be enumerated before the PEG slot on this board (Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus). The new SSD went to the CPU-connected slot, the chipset-connected slot was already populated before. Since fitting ...

OK, lufah -a / enable-all-gpus did seem to work. Status shows the default (only) group with another gpu:10:00:00.

Aaaand it's folding again! The gpu:09:00:00 is still present in the default group but apparently that doesn't hurt. Web Control only shows one GPU, enabled.

Thank you!

I'm not sure how to specify the default group... lufah groups still comes up emtpy.

Added missing info to the post above. The browser console shows only errors related to the team logo that can't be found. lufah upgraded to 0.8.2 - lufah state shows { "info": { "version": "8.4.9", "url": "https://v8-4.foldingathome.org/", "os&q...

Yesterday, I added another NVMe SSD to my machine (Win 10 22H2) and today it's not folding any more. https://v8-4.foldingathome.org/ Web Control shows "No resources". Pausing and resuming the machine changes the play/pause button, but nothing else happens. The log shows normal startup, pla...

Already tried looking at the db - there are four tables: config , cores , groups , units (empty). Neither holds any information about project performance or similar. Possibly related, the TPF column in https://v8-4.foldingathome.org/ displays ??? when folding. On the Work Units tab, only the current...

> You can set columns from upper right account settings > appearance Excellent, well hidden column config! But there's no Estimated Credit or similar, just Base Credit. > Previous run time data, when it exists, is in client.db. Doesn't seem to exist - yet. I hope that's WIP. The client gets confused...

Sorry for being thick, but I can't see where to change displayed columns on https://v8-4.foldingathome.org/ after logging in. If you look at the table above, at 6.8% the estimate (10,979,237) is still nearly 20% lower than the 13,791,944 just before rebooting. The machine was largely idle and there ...

(8.3.18 running here) The ETA and PPD estimations are miles off for fresh units. Not only does the client forget about previous WU speeds from the same project (like 7.x), but it also shows ludicrous figures after a reboot. Additionally, there seems to be something wrong in the algorithm in that it ...

Thx, I can confirm the four missing WUs (oldest from 3 Oct) got credited last night.

Thx @Joe_H - I'm holding my breath then...

I have begun tracking my WUs and have found numerous ones not being credited, not even after days. Involved Projects are 16770, 16771, 16722 - all from the Huang lab.

Is there a way to reject those WUs to start with? Otherwise I'm forced to accept them but will dump them right away afterwards.

I used to schedule my 7.6 F@H client per command line options and to collect a work unit history, including

FAHClient.exe --send-command queue-info
FAHClient.exe --send-unpause
FAHClient.exe --send-finish
FAHClient.exe --send-pause

How do I do that with 8.x?

My first missing credit WU from that project that's still in the logs is from 4 Oct, so this issue isn't really new. I'm blackholing 160.45.68.201 until this is sorted out.

Merged with existing topic - j Today I've had the second WU (at least) from that project without getting any credit: 06:54:05:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64) 06:54:05:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:19600 run:880 clone:0 gen:565 core:0x...