Search found 15 matches
- Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:33 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."
- Replies: 225
- Views: 49403
Re: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."
This should be interesting.
- Tue May 01, 2012 11:19 pm
- Forum: How can we help FAH grow
- Topic: Discussion: what is holding F@h back?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 83609
Re: Discussion: what is holding F@h back?
The switch solution can be as simple as listing the switches and what they do on a help screen in the client.
- Tue May 01, 2012 10:02 pm
- Forum: How can we help FAH grow
- Topic: Discussion: what is holding F@h back?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 83609
Re: Discussion: what is holding F@h back?
My thoughts after folding for 6 years, which others have said above: - V7 client may not be 100% intuitive, but it's a big step in the right direction for easy of installation and upgrade. The switches are still pretty obscure and probably should be listed for easy reference on the client. - V7 clie...
- Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:56 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Bigadv points change
- Replies: 563
- Views: 137749
Re: point system is getting ridiculous...
First, it's simple. Single modification to formula, single data point modified for each WU. Second, it's universal. Applies to all clients and fits into current unified benchmark scheme. Lastly, and perhaps most important, it provides the necessary data needed to form a basis for statistical analys...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:01 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Bigadv points change
- Replies: 563
- Views: 137749
Re: point system is getting ridiculous...
I would like to know if my meager contributions are actually worthwhile. It seems that quickly returned work units are several magnitudes more important to the project than the number of work units. Has the project advanced to a point where my stock clocked Q6600, for example, is more of a hindranc...
- Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:10 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Bziped summary files corrupted
- Replies: 29
- Views: 6645
Kakaostats #1
Kakao: I just wanted to express my gratitude for your stats page. It's a very simple but effective design for conveying a lot of information. Thanks in advance for your work in making it operational again!!!
- JP
- JP
- Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:56 am
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7
- Replies: 768
- Views: 827594
Re: HFM.NET - Client Monitoring Application for Folding@Home
Yes, this client is showing blue Runningasync, as most of my SMP clients are.
The download time does look correct, compensating for the standard stanford time offset. The time on the WinXP host is correct.
- JP
The download time does look correct, compensating for the standard stanford time offset. The time on the WinXP host is correct.
- JP
- Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:40 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7
- Replies: 768
- Views: 827594
Re: HFM.NET - Client Monitoring Application for Folding@Home
Kfactor is 2.1 on p6015. Here is my FAHlog.txt. Name: CPS003 Path: \\CPS003\FAH6\ Number of Frames Observed: 262 Min. Time / Frame : 00:03:09 - 16,792.2 PPD Avg. Time / Frame : 00:03:16 - 15,900.7 PPD Cur. Time / Frame : 00:03:18 - 48,973.2 PPD R3F. Time / Frame : 00:03:18 - 48,973.2 PPD All Time / ...
- Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:44 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7
- Replies: 768
- Views: 827594
Re: HFM.NET - Client Monitoring Application for Folding@Home
YesChelseaOilman wrote:In HFM.NET go to the Benchmarks page for that P6021 WU. Is the KFactor showing as 2.1?JPinTO wrote:I'm still showing 62000PPD on 03:13 frame time.
- Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:15 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7
- Replies: 768
- Views: 827594
Re: HFM.NET - Client Monitoring Application for Folding@Home
I tried that, but I'm still showing 62000PPD on 03:13 frame time. Thanks for the suggestion.
- JP
- JP
- Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:19 pm
- Forum: 3rd party contributed software
- Topic: HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7
- Replies: 768
- Views: 827594
Re: HFM.NET - Client Monitoring Application for Folding@Home
I'm running HFM.net v0.4.8 - Beta. On fast i7 machines, the GRO-A3 cores are reporting much higher than actual PPD and credits. For instance, I have a machine on P6021 with frame time: 03:13 and it's reporting 12748 credit and 57070 PPD. The calculator http://www.linuxforge.net/bonuscalc2.php shows ...
- Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:56 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: (171.67.108.25:8080)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1819
Re: (171.67.108.25:8080)
I've got the same problem on a few of my machines. The last few days they are downloading WU's fine, processing them and then are unable to upload. I can ping 171.67.108.25 without problem and it's a hardwired connection. This may be a Linux networking issue, but I'm not sure how to resolve it since...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:09 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.56 not responding
- Replies: 361
- Views: 57245
Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding
Status 503
Could not connect to work server
Could not connect to work server
- Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:29 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: 100,000 points per day folding beast
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3815
Re: 100,000 points per day folding beast
You have to wonder how 4 of these things in a box would do: http://en.expreview.com/2008/12/09/gefo ... es-09.html
- Sun Oct 05, 2008 11:56 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.56 not responding
- Replies: 361
- Views: 57245
Re: 171.64.65.56 is in Reject status
Server is now up.