Folding Forum

The well known list:
https://folding.lar.systems/gpu_ppd/overall_ranks
There is a "3080 Lite Hash Rate" currently at rank 3. It has the same PPD like the 3080. The "3060TI Lite Hash Rate" is even faster than the 3060TI.

I must do something wrong. I use a PCIe riser with PCIe 2.0 x1->x16 (x16 only mechanical), and have no performance penalties on a GTX1050Ti. For a very small protein, the performance penalty of 1x will be small enough that you probably won't notice. For a larger protein (with more atoms) the GTX105...

I must do something wrong. I use a PCIe riser with PCIe 2.0 x1->x16 (x16 only mechanical), and have no performance penalties on a GTX1050Ti.

Still waiting for someone to enlighten me. :D The model number, in your case M 6497 vs. M 7465 is displayed in the FAHControl window. In the case the 2070 is the slower one, your PPD wil not decrease that much (1,4M vs. 1.7M), but if it is the faster Rev. A, then you get 2,3M PPD. I know, it is a b...

inOr wrote:So, if you want more power than a one-processor machine then a GPU is the best way to go?

Yes. Just compare these lists:
https://folding.lar.systems/gpu_ppd/overall_ranks
and
https://folding.lar.systems/cpu_ppd/overall_ranks

PantherX wrote:F@H doesn't support Beowolf cluster... instead, you can run an independent client on each "node" and see how they perform.

I did this some time ago. It was boring.

I have some more numbers in average PPD over several FAH-Projects, tested on some of my ARM-SBCs: RasperryPi 4B (4GB): 1680 Rock 64: 670 Odroid C2: 860 RockPi-4A: 1906 On the RockPi-4A, it runs on all 6 cores, on the other computers, FAH uses all 4 cores. The numbers are with passkey. But I stopped ...

A PCIe 4.0 x1 riser is not faster than a PCIe 3.0 x1 riser, if your GPU is not a PCIe4.0 device. You would need at least a GPU of RTX3000 series or RX5000 to take benefit of PCIe 4.0.

So we have to read the CPUid in this way:
C911-> Folding slot
D85E66C982CF -> System (e.g. mac address)
?

C711D85E66C982CF xxx.xxx.xxx.129 266078 NVidia GPU Linux 155,556 1 2020-11-22 11:24:50 17421 0 726 92 DB11D85E66C982CF xxx.xxx.xxx.129 266078 x86 Linux 24,159 1 2020-11-22 11:54:54 16925 38 7238 21 D111D85E66C982CF xxx.xxx.xxx.129 266078 x86 Linux 9,403.75 1 2020-11-22 12:04:51 17415 0 296 180 C811...

This is exactly the way I do usually. Additionally, you may note down your PPD of the old GPU and compare it to the new.

I'd be interested to know who out there is running at about a 20M PPD level and what hardware it takes to do that. Or frankly anyone > 5M PPD, what are hardware combinations that are known working for 8, 10, 12, 15, or 20M PPD ? I see some people getting those kinds of numbers and I'm not sure if i...

Jupis_folder wrote:The easiest way to see the FAH performance of a GPU is to look at this site:
https://folding.lar.systems/folding_dat ... pd_overall

Some day you will discover the RX6900XT there. I assume not in one of the TOP 5, but the TOP10.

Rank 9. Check.

The easiest way to see the FAH performance of a GPU is to look at this site: https://folding.lar.systems/folding_dat ... pd_overall Some day you will discover the RX6900XT there. I assume not in one of the TOP 5, but the TOP10. As time goes by, (in terms of years), the performance of the new GPUs wi...

Thank you all for your explanations!