Search found 73 matches
- Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:02 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Open letter to PG [with response]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 13606
Re: Open letter to PG [with response]
Really looking forward to test the v7 beta When it releases after all testing is done it can be a true icebreaker in bringing even more people into FAH.
- Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:31 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Responses To A Decade of F@H!
- Replies: 28
- Views: 5374
Re: Responses To A Decade of F@H!
Its always intriguing to know how great ideas started out .
- Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:22 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: project 6701-6702
- Replies: 6
- Views: 853
Re: project 6701-6702
err, this forumcategory is a place you only post problems with certain WUs.
- Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:23 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.103 GPU vspg3v2 densign without WU's [Resolved]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1146
Re: 171.64.65.103 GPU vspg3v2 densign without WU's
When can we expect a fix?
- Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:26 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.201 needs more WUs asap
- Replies: 3
- Views: 834
171.67.108.201 needs more WUs asap
Seems everybodys GTX460s has been idle for #20 attempts or so to get work now because of this. The AS is empty and needs to be filled up: 171.67.108.201 AS (GPU) vsp10v-vz01 pande accept Accepting 0.00 0 0 999 100 94 38 0 0 0 0 03:48:04] + Attempting to get work packet [03:48:04] Passkey found [03:4...
- Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:47 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: project 6701-6702
- Replies: 6
- Views: 853
Re: project 6701-6702
Whats the problem if you got nothing to report atm? And two whole projects. Are you being serious?
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:58 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1472
Re: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
That was in fact the thread i was referring to and took part of earlier today. I understand what your saying and do not disagree on that.
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:55 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1472
Re: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
Why does the CS discard it for 2 hours if that feature isnt fully implemented yet? Sounds like a feature that shouldnt be implemented until it is fiinished? The CS's used to work fine. Then the Pande Group started talking about a better version of server code. Naturally a new version of the server ...
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:53 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1472
Re: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
Just FYI, that WU was completed and credited to a folder. I can't tell if that was you since you didn't show the part of the log with your user name and team number. It's in my signature. But PantherX showed me from my own log a part that I had missed whereit uploaded sucessfully a long time after ...
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:49 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Open letter to PG [with response]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 13606
Re: What PG respond to that?
That sounds very promising. Looking foreward to check it out
And I understand it wouldnt be easy to make a x-tier model of the CS system, but not every good thing comes easy. But lets first see how what you mention works out.
And I understand it wouldnt be easy to make a x-tier model of the CS system, but not every good thing comes easy. But lets first see how what you mention works out.
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:31 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Open letter to PG [with response]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 13606
Re: What PG respond to that?
2) Moving Bonus Points calculation to Clients could possibly allow the software to be manipulated to give more points (nobody wants that). Also one has to remember that the Gen X+1 cannot be sent out unless the Gen X is submitted to the Server. As the Bonus Points scheme favors Science, you are not...
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:03 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1472
Re: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
Why does the CS discard it for 2 hours if that feature isnt fully implemented yet? Sounds like a feature that shouldnt be implemented until it is fiinished? W3520 POV GTX 480 Mist 1kW 12GB RAM (as seen in the log) The only change that took place was that earlier that day the GPU WUs stopped getting ...
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:34 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1472
Re: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
It was? darn sorry, i have to recheck hehe
It was just so weird why the CS would discard it for almost 2 hours. And as you can see the client got all kinds of problems after that.
It was just so weird why the CS would discard it for almost 2 hours. And as you can see the client got all kinds of problems after that.
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:32 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1472
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:37 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1472
Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11)
It seems it wont get uploaded after finished and the server replies that it doesnt know about this WU. Then my client goes into (remission) a series of errors. [20:04:19] - Server does not have record of this unit. Will try again later. [18:00:00] Project: 11179 (Run 5, Clone 1, Gen 11) [18:00:00] [...