Search found 35 matches
- Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:34 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1935
Re: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
Hi Justin, thank you for understanding. I thought it would be interesting if we could see the status by the degree of completion of projects. In my opinion, many people would be motivated and aware of their contribution to science when we see the status and the light at the end of the tunnel). Some...
- Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:19 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1935
Re: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
Hi Andre_Ti, I do actually care quite a bit about the project, hence the restarts in the error counts to try and get more data. As I mentioned above, we don't currently have a good way to selectively filter which RUN x CLONEs get their errors reset- I can either not reset the error counts and get n...
- Fri Nov 08, 2024 7:44 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1935
Re: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
Project: 18237 (Run 648, Clone 1, Gen 0) Even earlier 2024-09-25 14:22:01. Are you sure this project is important to you? 16:13:21:WU00:FS01:Assigned to work server 158.130.118.23 16:13:21:WU00:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: gpu:1:0 AD102 [GeForce RTX 4090] from 158.130.118.23 16:13:21:...
- Fri Nov 08, 2024 7:42 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1935
Re: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
Project: 18237 (Run 899, Clone 0, Gen 44) Unbelievable, this has been going on since 2024-09-29 15:45:01. 15:28:23:WU00:FS01:Assigned to work server 158.130.118.23 15:28:23:WU00:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: gpu:1:0 AD102 [GeForce RTX 4090] from 158.130.118.23 15:28:23:WU00:FS01:Connec...
- Fri Nov 08, 2024 7:36 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1935
Re: Corrupted / bad job 18237/1069/0/71 (failing for all users)
Another broken WU - Project: 18237 (Run 904, Clone 1, Gen 32) . 18:15:07:WU01:FS01:Connecting to assign1.foldingathome.org:80 18:15:08:WU01:FS01:Assigned to work server 158.130.118.23 18:15:08:WU01:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: gpu:1:0 GA104 [GeForce RTX 3070] from 158.130.118.23 18:15:...
- Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:03 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
- Replies: 15
- Views: 13884
Re: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
The server was rebooted 7 hours ago, the problem remains unresolved.
- Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:51 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
- Replies: 15
- Views: 13884
Re: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
The server still doesn't take points into account.
- Fri Oct 04, 2024 3:16 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
- Replies: 15
- Views: 13884
Re: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
Similarly for 16780 and 16781
- Thu Dec 07, 2023 5:02 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Super slow downloads from 129.32.209.200:8080
- Replies: 8
- Views: 37156
Re: Super slow downloads from 129.32.209.200:8080
Today it's better, loading with minimal delays.
- Wed Dec 06, 2023 6:51 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Super slow downloads from 129.32.209.200:8080
- Replies: 8
- Views: 37156
Re: Super slow downloads from 129.32.209.200:8080
Apparently this server is completely broken, the loading time has increased to 30 minutes. 17:46:20:WU01:FS00:Connecting to assign1.foldingathome.org:80 17:46:20:WU00:FS00:0x23:Checkpoint completed at step 1225000 17:46:21:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 129.32.209.200 17:46:21:WU01:FS00:Requestin...
- Sun Dec 03, 2023 6:39 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Super slow downloads from 129.32.209.200:8080
- Replies: 8
- Views: 37156
Re: Super slow downloads from 129.32.209.200:8080
Yes, I have a similar problem. It takes up to 10 minutes to load a working unit from this server.
- Thu Nov 09, 2023 4:11 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: client offline time or calculation time window ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 33796
Re: client offline time or calculation time window ?
I think you're exaggerating. This is an open source project (like similar ones based on the BOINC platform), the results are also published in the public domain.
- Thu Nov 09, 2023 3:27 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: client offline time or calculation time window ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 33796
Re: client offline time or calculation time window ?
What's wrong with SiDock from Russia?bikeaddict wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 1:51 pm SiDock is partly based in Russia if you're OK with that.
- Wed Sep 20, 2023 3:56 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: No work assigments...
- Replies: 106
- Views: 2912398
Re: No work assigments...
What about Project 12233? It should be hitting beta testers soon ... watch for the official announcement. Thanks for the information. Tested it. For a project with a number of atoms of 263 487, the PPD is below average (for example, on a project 18725 with a number of atoms more than three times sm...
- Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:37 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: No work assigments...
- Replies: 106
- Views: 2912398