Folding Forum

I thought that was the whole point of moving this thread to FF to begin with?

Looks good Xil. I noticed if we move the "list" tags to the numbered items instead of the headings, it looks a bit better IMHO. I did it in my post above if you want to see how it looks.

I agree that 80% sounds lax on its face, however I can also say I was thankful it WAS that lax just recently. I tried to run smp (n - 1) on a dual xeon box recently. Might have been smp -15 on a dual nehalem system if I recall. The end result was approximately 150 instant EUEs over the course of a f...

Regarding The Project/Work Units (WUs) 1) Manipulating the Assignment Server ("AS") logic in any way to obtain high Points Per Day ("PPD") Work Units ("WU") and/or block low PPD WUs is strictly prohibited. Sources: ( PG Member , Super Moderator ) 2) Deleting/Dumping a ...

The links posted above as references are not sufficient for you?

SMP - 1.We strongly suggest people run this client on 4-core boxes. While it will run on 2-core boxes, we have noticed some potential problems (we are looking into these issues now). Your point is valid, however nothing further has ever been said about 2-core limitations on SMP, to my knowledge. An...

-Circumventing the Assignment Server logic in any way to attempt to pick more desirable work units or block unwanted work units is prohibited. Reference. -Using flags or client switches to mislead Assignment Servers (or for any other inappropriate purposes) is prohibited. Reference. -Using unpublish...

Cleaned up the links, added new suggestions. -It's not allowed to circumvent the assignment server logic in any way to attempt to pick more desirable work units or block unwanted work units. Reference. -Packaging the F@H files inside of another software package in a attempt to install without the us...

I have work as well. So far so good. Thanks a lot!

Actually I may have spoke too soon. After the WU finished that I picked up, mentioned in post above, it cannot get new work 20:28:10] Completed 495000 out of 500000 steps (99%) [20:31:48] Completed 500000 out of 500000 steps (100%) [20:31:49] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000 [20:31:59...

Actually, I don't know if this is helpful or hurtful, but it appears I may have resolved the issue on my end. First I uninstalled then reinstalled. No luck. I uninstalled again, but this time reinstalled to a new folder on my hard drive. Now it works. So, it appears something may have been fouled up...

I got rid of the SMP 6 flag, and advmethods flag. Now the error is different. Launch directory: C:\smp Executable: C:\smp\Folding@home-Win32-x86.exe Arguments: -smp -verbosity 9 [03:46:25] - Ask before connecting: No [03:46:25] - User name: jebo_4jc (Team 77826) [03:46:25] - User ID: 7C0F707170861F8...

I have another machine running the same setup, and it just pulled work from the same server. The first machine is a Q6600, set to smp -4, advmethods. It's the one that's getting work just fine. The one that is struggling is an AMD Thuban set to smp -6, also with advmethods. Is the AMD CPU being disc...

Thanks. I've tried a handful of client and PC restarts. I even tried changing up the flags to see if I could trigger being assigned to a new server, but nothing seems to have worked. # Windows SMP Console Edition ################################################# #####################################...

yes I am able to open that. It reports "OK"

Hope I'm not off base here, but I'm having trouble with this server for some reason ############################################################################### ############################################################################### Launch directory: C:\smp Executable: C:\smp\Folding@home...