Search found 14 matches
- Sun Mar 22, 2020 1:32 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: WU 14334 and other projects with no description
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1178
Re: WU 14334 and other projects with no description
Done! Sorry for the delay.
- Fri Mar 13, 2020 6:57 pm
- Forum: Announcements - Folding Consortium
- Topic: New COVID-(CPU, A7) Projects (14328/14329) on ADVANCED/FAH
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2986
New COVID-(CPU, A7) Projects (14328/14329) on ADVANCED/FAH
<project type="GRO_A7" id="14328"> <runs v="1"/> <clones v="2500"/> <atoms v="62180"/> <stats_credit v="370"/> <project type="GRO_A7" id="14329"> <runs v="1"/> <clones v="2500"/> <atoms v="62180&...
- Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:27 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 14197 (3, 790, 3) & (1, 763, 0) - Server responded WORK_QUIT
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4325
Re: 14197 (3, 790, 3) & (1, 763, 0) - Server responded WORK_
Thanks for reporting these. Just saw the increased error rates on this projects. Looking into it now.
I've paused this project for now while I investigate. Let me know if you see this error on any others in the mean time.
I've paused this project for now while I investigate. Let me know if you see this error on any others in the mean time.
- Sat Mar 07, 2020 8:35 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 14314 (Run 0, Clone 132, Gen 2) GROMACS error
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4784
Re: Project: 14314 (Run 0, Clone 132, Gen 2) GROMACS error
Thanks for reporting this. PROJ14314 has been particularly troublesome. I've just restriced 6-core clients from being assigned it, but I'll keep an eye on the failure rate and consider removing the project entirely.
- Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:33 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: project 14312 to 14319 missing desciption
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1177
Re: project 14312 to 14319 missing desciption
Thanks for catching this. The project descriptions should be added by the end of the day.
They are the same as the 14086-14093 set though.
These projects just moved to Advanced recently.
Edit: Should be done now!
They are the same as the 14086-14093 set though.
These projects just moved to Advanced recently.
Edit: Should be done now!
- Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:48 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: No credit from 155.247.166.220 and 155.247.166.219
- Replies: 72
- Views: 18889
Re: No credit from 155.247.166.220 and 155.247.166.219
The work is definitely not lost and we are very grateful for everyone's contributions. We have completed a security assessment for our servers as of a few days to a week ago. May I assume that since no one has posted here that the issue is still occurring? I would like to get all due points awarded ...
- Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:01 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: No credit from 155.247.166.220 and 155.247.166.219
- Replies: 72
- Views: 18889
Re: No credit from 155.247.166.220 and 155.247.166.219
Unfortunately, this has happened before. We believe it to be related to the firewall at our university.
I've already started looking into it and will post updates to this thread.
edit: also, last time this happened all lost credit was awarded at once as soon as the issue was fixed.
I've already started looking into it and will post updates to this thread.
edit: also, last time this happened all lost credit was awarded at once as soon as the issue was fixed.
- Thu Mar 30, 2017 7:39 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: missing credit for several wu's [Proj's 86nn & 137nn]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 8968
Re: missing credit for several wu's [Proj's 86nn & 137nn]
I'm really sorry for the delay. I've been working on this since the issue arose, as there were several errors occurring at that time. It turns out that there had been an update to the firewall ruleset for these two work servers so the points that had been earned could not be relayed to the appropria...
- Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:31 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: missing credit for several wu's [Proj's 86nn & 137nn]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 8968
Re: missing credit for several wu's [Proj's 86nn & 137nn]
I'm sorry to hear that. We'll continue to work on it to get things fixed as soon as possible.
- Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:09 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: missing credit for several wu's [Proj's 86nn & 137nn]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 8968
Re: missing credit for several wu's [Proj's 86nn & 137nn]
Based on the error messages we have received, we have increased the limit on file descriptors on our server(s) in hopes that this will solve the problem.
Please let me know if the problem still persists, and if so I'll continue to work on it.
Very sorry for the inconvenience.
Please let me know if the problem still persists, and if so I'll continue to work on it.
Very sorry for the inconvenience.
- Sat Feb 04, 2017 6:18 am
- Forum: Announcements - Folding Consortium
- Topic: releasing p8663-8669,8683-8689 to Advanced,FAH
- Replies: 0
- Views: 945
releasing p8663-8669,8683-8689 to Advanced,FAH
Releasing SMP A7 (GRO_A7) projects p8663-69, p8683-89 to (Advanced, FAH). These are being served from vav3.ocis.temple.edu (155.247.166.219). Project description for all here: http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/fah ... ned?p=8663 CPU restrictions: 1 <= CPUs<=27, CPUs!=7, CPUs!=11 Project: 8663 <sta...
- Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:59 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: FahCore returned: FAILED_3 (255 = 0xff)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4593
Re: FahCore returned: FAILED_3 (255 = 0xff)
Don't think it was a bad WU. It keeps trying until it fails too many times and returns with this: 17:55:08:WARNING:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: FAILED_3 (255 = 0xff) 17:55:08:WARNING:WU01:FS01:Too many errors, failing 17:55:08:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAILED project:1140...
- Fri Jun 24, 2016 9:19 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: FahCore returned: FAILED_3 (255 = 0xff)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4593
Re: FahCore returned: FAILED_3 (255 = 0xff)
Thank you for your response. I've been keeping up-to-date, so I'm using NVIDIA driver 368.39. I did have a GTX 770 before, but I had not used it for folding. I don't see that portion of the log, as the log is filled with past successful CPU runs, so I re-installed the client and will post the log be...
- Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:20 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: FahCore returned: FAILED_3 (255 = 0xff)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4593
FahCore returned: FAILED_3 (255 = 0xff)
I just received my new GTX 1070 card and was looking forward to folding with it, both with the F@H client and on my own, but I am running into some errors that cause it to fail everytime I start. Below I have listed the relevant information: System Info: http://i.imgur.com/LXP96iD.png Error Log: htt...