Added client-type advanced
Upgraded to 344.80 drivers
Have 16GB ram
Thanks all
Search found 11 matches
- Wed Dec 24, 2014 6:51 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: BAD_WORK_UNIT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3252
- Tue Dec 23, 2014 9:37 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: BAD_WORK_UNIT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3252
Re: BAD_WORK_UNIT
I’ve lowered the base/boost clocks (they are linked together) to set the base clock to the NVIDIA reference value of 1020MHz Bumped memtestcl up to 1000 iterations and it ran without errors. From what you guys are telling me, I won’t get rid of the FAH errors until NVIDIA fixes the driver. Thanks fo...
- Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:15 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: BAD_WORK_UNIT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3252
Re: BAD_WORK_UNIT
Did not find memchkCL with google.
Did try memtestcl set at 1800MB memory, 5400 MHz memory clock, 1072 GPU clock, 100 iterations.
The test showed zero failures. It probably needs to run at least overnight for any confidence.
Did try memtestcl set at 1800MB memory, 5400 MHz memory clock, 1072 GPU clock, 100 iterations.
The test showed zero failures. It probably needs to run at least overnight for any confidence.
- Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:11 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: BAD_WORK_UNIT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3252
Re: BAD_WORK_UNIT
It didn't take long to get the error. *********************** Log Started 2014-12-22T00:59:33Z *********************** 00:59:33:WU01:FS00:Starting 00:59:33:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/ProgramData/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pand...
- Mon Dec 22, 2014 4:35 am
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: BAD_WORK_UNIT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3252
Re: BAD_WORK_UNIT
1.There is a factory overclock. Using ASUS GPU tweak I lowered the boost clock to NVIDIAs specified 1085 MHz. I didn’t find a way to reduce the base clock. I believe the memory clock is on spec. 2. The GPU is running at about 50 degrees C. 3 The power supply can put out 54A on 12V+, more than enough...
- Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:56 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: BAD_WORK_UNIT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3252
BAD_WORK_UNIT
It seems like every couple of days FAH reports “ BAD_WORK_UNIT”. It happens often enough to suspect that these are not really bad work units. The error is always “Error downloading array energyBuffer: clEnqueueReadBuffer”. It happens both on core 17 and core 18. Fah client 7.4.4, ASUS GTX 750 Ti, NV...
- Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:58 am
- Forum: Problems with NVidia drivers
- Topic: 9401 fails on GM107 but not GK106 {Hopefully fixed}
- Replies: 160
- Views: 56828
Re: 9401 fails on GM107 but not GK106 {Hopefully fixed}
Can you list the projects that were successful before separately from the projects which fail now? Are any projects on both lists? Please confirm which drivers you're using and when they were last updated. I think it fair to assume you did not change the gtx750ti and overclocking settings didn't ch...
- Tue Oct 07, 2014 3:47 pm
- Forum: Problems with NVidia drivers
- Topic: 9401 fails on GM107 but not GK106 {Hopefully fixed}
- Replies: 160
- Views: 56828
Re: 9401 fails on GM107 but not GK106 {Hopefully fixed}
Is there any way to quickly check that a card is failing I have checked the Nvidia site and the Asus (my card) site and found none. Now that video cards are being used as computers, there is a real need for something to load them and check for accuracy similar to the Intel Burn Test being used to c...
- Mon Oct 06, 2014 1:44 pm
- Forum: Problems with NVidia drivers
- Topic: 9401 fails on GM107 but not GK106 {Hopefully fixed}
- Replies: 160
- Views: 56828
Re: 9401 fails on GM107 but not GK106 {Hopefully fixed}
I have a Asus gtx750ti which has had its share of error messages. Something has changed because there is nothing but failures now. *********************** Log Started 2014-10-06T03:58:38Z *********************** 03:59:57:FS00:Unpaused 03:59:58:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.201:80 03:59:58:WU00:...
- Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:50 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.11 & 171.67.108.21 down
- Replies: 92
- Views: 28083
Re: 171.67.108.11 & 171.67.108.21 down
Thanks for the explanation. I was wrong thinking that there were specific cards associated each FAH Core. If I understand you right, the association is between a generation of graphic cards/drivers, and the driver (stubs?) of a core. So, if support for the Tesla generation is discontinued, core 11 i...
- Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:02 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.11 & 171.67.108.21 down
- Replies: 92
- Views: 28083
Re: 171.67.108.11 & 171.67.108.21 down
That’s well and good, but what is it safe to upgrade to. You can buy the latest and greatest most expensive card and probably be safe. But what if you wanted to buy a somewhat older, maybe used, card? How do you avoid buying a card that is about to become unsupported? The white list shows what is su...