Exactly the same problem as I had with Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3) ie running slow , 0.7pph won't meet preferred deadline. Only the second one of this series I've had and both are not right. Will regard this as another bad WU.
Pete
Search found 125 matches
- Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:35 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 10081 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 747
- Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:48 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 812
Re: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
O.K, thanks, I may as well leave it to complete now as its at 95%.
Pete
Pete
- Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:14 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 812
Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
First one of these I've seen, got it using advmethods on 2.2ghz dual core Vista machine. Assuming the 25 point credit is correct then it's running at 0.7 pph and won't meet the initial 24 hour deadline. I can't see any problem with CPU usage and the other core is getting 7.0 pph :? After leaving it ...
- Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:53 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: P10200
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1712
P10200
Not sure what the problem is but I got this from 171.67.108.39. using -advmethods flag. I can't find it on the summary page and it's showing up as a p11289 worth 69 points using FahSpy :? Server 171.67.108.39 looks to be running O.K. [18:17:12] + Attempting to send results [February 12 18:17:12 UTC]...
- Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:17 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1219
Re: 171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)
Started getting that message today with the following unit and all others since: [19:44:59] Project: 10632 (Run 26, Clone 111, Gen 29) [19:44:59] + Attempting to send results [October 30 19:44:59 UTC] [19:44:59] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core [19:44:59] (Read 3256621 bytes from disk...
- Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:20 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1219
171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)
This server has just started with the dreaded "Server reports Problem with unit" message, the last 4 units on different machines have all reported this. Usually means that the work is lost .
Edit.... 6 on the run now....machines off.
Pete
Edit.... 6 on the run now....machines off.
Pete
- Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:50 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.39
- Replies: 1
- Views: 780
171.67.108.39
This server has been in standby for several days and I've got a few units to send in. Could someone look into this please.
Pete
Pete
- Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:51 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 129.74.85.15
- Replies: 2
- Views: 969
Re: 129.74.85.15
Everything looks O.K from here. I had this same message on about 8 machines yesterday, made a change to the flags and got work right away...go figure.
Pete
Pete
- Fri Sep 17, 2010 12:58 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 129.74.85.15
- Replies: 2
- Views: 969
129.74.85.15
Thought this had been resolved, obviously not. [21:34:47] + Attempting to send results [September 16 21:34:47 UTC] [21:37:04] + Results successfully sent [21:37:04] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home. [21:37:04] + Number of Units Completed: 1844 [21:37:13] - Preparing to get new work un...
- Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:11 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Problem with unknown project??
- Replies: 1
- Views: 599
Problem with unknown project??
Someone on my team has reported that they sent in over a thousand WU's on the tenth of April, he usually sends in one or two per day. I've requested further info from him but after a quick look at O/C stat I can see that Team Ukraine are sending in 7,000 units a day, about 10x their normal output fo...
- Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:11 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 169.230.26.30
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2371
Re: 169.230.26.30
Looks like it was fixed and I got/sent some work. Didn't last for long though, its gone into reject mode again..
Pete
Pete
- Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:20 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: No appropriate work server was available
- Replies: 59
- Views: 17089
Re: No appropriate work server was available
No work again. 15 or so CPU's idle.
Pete
Pete
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:25 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: No appropriate work server was available
- Replies: 59
- Views: 17089
Re: No appropriate work server was available
All machines picked up work overnight
Pete
Pete
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:41 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4169
Re: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
Hadn't checked my PPD for a week, but I can see a 30k PPD drop off since the 5th. I have 5 machines running these so it would seem that at 6k per day per machine that we're not getting credit. Can't be 100% certain as there's no longer any way of checking the number of WU's on each project. Pete Do...
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:35 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4169
Re: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
Yes, mine have just been credited , thanks,bruce wrote: It looks like they were credited less than half hour ago. (It's 22:14 PST now)
Pete