Search found 30 matches

by chaosdsm
Sun Aug 11, 2019 3:04 pm
Forum: FAH Hardware
Topic: GTX 1660Ti Compute Performance
Replies: 61
Views: 24825

Re: GTX 1660Ti Compute Performance

Lately it's been averaging 678k PPD overclocked (when I'm not using the PC) because I'm getting 14180's (705kPPD) and 13816's (624kPPD) almost exclusively. Out of the last 22 work units, six were 13816, Fourteen were 14180's, one was 14146 (755kPPD) and one was 14178 (780kPPD). My real world PPD (si...
by chaosdsm
Sun Aug 04, 2019 3:47 pm
Forum: FAH Hardware
Topic: GTX 1660Ti Compute Performance
Replies: 61
Views: 24825

Re: GTX 1660Ti Compute Performance

Been folding on a new EVGA GTX 1660 Ti XC Gaming card for 11 days now and thought I'd share my results here. I'm very impressed with the results as far as PPD per Watt of electricity goes! My results have been recorded using HFM Note: some of the results from this first set are with the card at fact...
by chaosdsm
Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:52 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: 13201 (Run 41, Clone 14, Gen 8) Bad
Replies: 7
Views: 2806

Re: 13201 (Run 41, Clone 14, Gen 8) Bad

I doubt it's a driver issue, but I can't rule it out. All FAH projects run a "sanity check" periodically designed to terminate projects containing errors (the idea being that if the simulation is going to explode soon or be discarded anyway, it's a good idea to abort the run before it was...
by chaosdsm
Sun Nov 20, 2016 6:03 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: 13201 (Run 41, Clone 14, Gen 8) Bad
Replies: 7
Views: 2806

Re: 13201 (Run 41, Clone 14, Gen 8) Bad

Not a bad WU, it has been completed by another folder: Hi ******** (team ******), Your WU (P13201 R16 C6 G12) was added to the stats database on 2016-11-16 02:08:33 for 74881.7 points of credit. Interesting that it failed 3 times in virtually the exact same spot. Wonder if it could be a driver issu...
by chaosdsm
Sun Nov 20, 2016 1:21 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: 13201 (Run 41, Clone 14, Gen 8) Bad
Replies: 7
Views: 2806

Re: 13201 (Run 41, Clone 14, Gen 8) Bad

FAULTY project:13201 run:16 clone:6 gen:12 Failed 3 times, just seconds after completing step 20 each time 05:13:38:WU01:FS01:0x21:Project: 13201 (Run 16, Clone 6, Gen 12) 05:13:38:WU01:FS01:0x21:Unit: 0x00000010ab436c66577fedfea7da5cd8 05:13:38:WU01:FS01:0x21:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000...
by chaosdsm
Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:48 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: No credit P92** (WS 171.67.108.104)
Replies: 7
Views: 4358

Re: No credit showing as of yet for p9210(r32,c0,g0)

7im wrote:What is your fah donor name?
mine is SM-71 on team 111065
by chaosdsm
Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:05 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: No credit P92** (WS 171.67.108.104)
Replies: 7
Views: 4358

No credit showing as of yet for p9210(r32,c0,g0)

Both projects that completed AFTER this one finished, have shown up in stats, but the points for this work unit are still missing ??? 00:44:10:WU00:FS01:0x21:Project: 9210 (Run 32, Clone 0, Gen 0) 00:44:10:WU00:FS01:0x21:Unit: 0x00000003ab436c685796c0eebd7b045e 00:44:10:WU00:FS01:0x21:CPU: 0x0000000...
by chaosdsm
Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:50 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."
Replies: 225
Views: 46995

Re: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."

Sure, but I was reacting to your statement that you were not sure Kepler would ever reach Fermi levels. Kepler pulls good PPD even without the optimizations from what I have seen (there have been reports of some Kepler cards outperforming equivalent Fermi cards for some projects as well). With full...
by chaosdsm
Sat Dec 08, 2012 4:27 am
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: New core = significant production drop GPU
Replies: 47
Views: 16762

Re: New core = significant production drop GPU

It'd be ideal to have a hybrid core, where multiple optimizations could be contained. Support for new architectures could be added as needed, without affecting older GPUs. I don't see that happening from a single core. As new technologies come about, it be comes increasingly difficult to "full...
by chaosdsm
Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:33 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 7623 (R4230, C0, G109) - High TPF
Replies: 16
Views: 4578

Re: Project: 7623 (R4230, C0, G109) - High TPF

Interesting that GTS 450 is outperforming the GTX 460.. Is that 460 the SE version? if so, it can indeed be outperformed by the 450's. Under core version 2.25, the absolute worst frame time I received on the 7623 with my first generation GTX-460 with 256bit memory bus & 1GB GDDR5 was 9min 38sec...
by chaosdsm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:10 am
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: New core = significant production drop GPU
Replies: 47
Views: 16762

Re: New core = significant production drop GPU

If kiore I believe the answer is that for 762x WU's PG requires the 2.25 core, for any other they do not, the core will not be changed by the servers on any WU other than the 762x WU if you never get a 762x WU the core will not get changed, so that says to me that the 2.22 core produces the same qua...
by chaosdsm
Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:04 pm
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: New core = significant production drop GPU
Replies: 47
Views: 16762

Re: New core = significant production drop GPU

Related question, I'm seeing people on several team forums saying to just dump core 2.25 and go back to core 2.22 if you're on a Fermi card. Just wondering if PG has an official stance on this subject???
by chaosdsm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:15 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: What's with project 70XX ????
Replies: 14
Views: 4543

Re: What's with project 70XX ????

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=22869 same project, same type of problem, different RCG. Fortunately, they seem to be few & far between. In the past 3 months I've had a total of 3 of them. For now, just have to live through them & report them... hopefully the programmers will eventually figure out ...
by chaosdsm
Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:02 am
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: New core = significant production drop GPU
Replies: 47
Views: 16762

Re: New core = significant production drop GPU

Logs don't forget or get confused, at least not normally... eVGA 560Ti FPB only 1,600ppd better than GTX-460??? I don't think so... I think you want to remember it doing about the same, in reality, that card should have been runing at least 16,000ppd on the 8054 work unit under core 2.22. Hell my GT...
by chaosdsm
Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:33 pm
Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
Topic: New core = significant production drop GPU
Replies: 47
Views: 16762

Re: New core = significant production drop GPU

Okay, I'm running 2.25, and my ppd only drops on certain units. The 6 and 7 series are poor, the 8's are normal. Not that I don't belive you , but can you post logs to support this??? I'm seeing the same drop in 8xxx series GPU wu's as well. Core Version 2.22 project 8054 - card clocked at 715/1430...