Folding Forum

As I recall, both cards were working on a core 15 (14,000 points). The 580 TPF was 6:50 and the 560ti 448 TPF was 11:10. I was a bigger difference than I expected for 512 cores vs 448.

Maybe a dumb question but.... I have two GF110s in a single box, a GTX580 @797mhz and a GTX560ti 448 @797mhz. The 560ti has 12.5% fewer cores so if I can get a stable overclock @910mhz, should I expect to get the same folding performance from both cards? It does not appear that way because @ stock f...

7im wrote:Are you using the same client settings as your team members?

IDK, I will have to check.

Another question that comes to mind is the contribution choice (cancer, alzhiemers, etc). I selected cancer, how does that weigh into WU assignment?

Thats a very bad way to experiment by abandoning work units! Anyone here could have told you there is no such thing as server affinity. Now all those wasted work units have to expire many days from now, slowing down the science. It also slows down each following generation in that line of work unit...

I experimented yesterday... (1) Following the advice posted earlier, I set one GPU slot to finish. After it was done I paused the other two and shut the client down. I restarted the client and then restarted the finished GPU slot which promptly downloaded a p8108. (2) I then deleted all three GPU sl...

From my POV work assignment does not seem to be priority based. Running 2 650t1 and 1 Fermi card (switched from 550ti to a 580) in the same box. Since Core17 went to full release (no advanced flag required) I have been assigned p8018 exclusively. Prior to full release I would alternate 7-10 days wit...

Those projects can be moved to full fah at any time, and new projects are on the way if not here already. And if those WUs run low, you will be assigned Normal WUs instead of Advanced WUs, so it makes very little difference in the long run. When core17 comes up to full speed, it won't matter at all...

thanks for the quick reply!

sorry that was a typo, should have been 595 not 585 18:45:16:WU01:FS01:0x15:Completed 24250000 out of 25000000 steps (97%). 18:53:23:WU01:FS01:0x15:Completed 24500000 out of 25000000 steps (98%). 19:01:31:WU01:FS01:0x15:Completed 24750000 out of 25000000 steps (99%). 19:01:31:WU02:FS01:Connecting to...

Looks like I finished two 8018 WUs early this afternoon but only got credit for one. Where do I go to see what was credited for each WU? What do the third party stats pages say? EOC stats says... Hourly Production Date, Time, Points, WUs 10.09, 6pm, 5,757, 1 10.09, 3pm, 5,757, 2 10.09, 12pm, 0, 0 t...

hunting back through the log, I think they were:

8018, 1150, 1, 32
8018, 585, 0, 180

Looks like I finished two 8018 WUs early this afternoon but only got credit for one. Where do I go to see what was credited for each WU?

Anyway to tell when 8018 will be wrapping up? My GPUs are on a death march... Something I have noticed.... I have a 560ti 448 and a 650ti folding next to each other in the same machine. On core15 projects the 560 is about 30-50% faster than the 650. On core17 projects the 560 is only about 10-15% fa...

Ok, I feel a little dumb but I still have a problem. The v7 interface is telling me that the 520 is in slot 00 and the 550ti is in 01. That is not correct. I paused the 520 and in EVGA precision the 550 load meter dropped to zero. This makes sense. I still have a clunker WU, instead of having a TPF ...

"If you have a choice, put the fastest GPU in the machine with the fastest PCIe bus." Yep, that's what I have now. The GT 520 is in the PCI (as in preAGP) slot and the GTX550ti is in the PCIe slot. I have been folding for a few months and have never seen the 520 have a TPF anywhere near th...