Search found 11 matches

by Tim_H
Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:10 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: New Assignment Server feedback/problem
Replies: 143
Views: 54770

Re: New Assignment Server feedback/problem

Hi, I'm having some issues getting work since last night. I have restarted the machine, as well as tried removing all flags and no change. I keep seeing "Empty work server assignment" I can ping the server but no work. Any help would be appreciated. 18:00:02:<config> 18:00:02: <!-- Folding...
by Tim_H
Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:07 pm
Forum: CPU Projects - released FAHCores _a7 & _a8 (a4 retired)
Topic: Virtual folding
Replies: 6
Views: 2893

Re: Virtual folding

I would use as many as possible, then reduce the priority for that vm
by Tim_H
Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:34 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 8049 (Run 593, Clone 2, Gen 21)
Replies: 2
Views: 864

Project: 8049 (Run 593, Clone 2, Gen 21)

This looks like a bad wu to me.? this hardware has been running without any errors. no overclock. running on 2x Xeon L5420's, 8GB ram 12:38:18:WU01:FS00:Starting 12:38:18:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCo...
by Tim_H
Tue May 01, 2012 12:56 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 6903 (Run 7, Clone 10, Gen 71)
Replies: 2
Views: 855

Re: Project: 6903 (Run 7, Clone 10, Gen 71)

I received this unit the other day, thought I would let you know [18:14:37] *------------------------------* [18:14:37] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core [18:14:37] Version 2.27 (Thu Feb 10 09:46:40 PST 2011) [18:14:37] [18:14:37] Preparing to commence simulation [18:14:37] - Looking at optimizations......
by Tim_H
Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:32 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 6097 (Run 0, Clone 36, Gen 192) EUE
Replies: 15
Views: 3870

Re: Project: 6097 (Run 0, Clone 36, Gen 192) EUE

I had this unit fail on me today several times. here are a few. [21:42:42] *------------------------------* [21:42:42] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core [21:42:42] Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010) [21:42:42] [21:42:42] Preparing to commence simulation [21:42:42] - Looking at optimizations... [21:42:42] - Cr...
by Tim_H
Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:39 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
Replies: 8
Views: 1767

Re: Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)

Blonde moment:
I found the problem, somewhere along the lines I had set the affinity to only two cores.

working fine now.

thanks for the help everyone!
by Tim_H
Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:41 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
Replies: 8
Views: 1767

Re: Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)

7im wrote:And just for grins, please remove the double verbosity 9 flags. Thanks.
didn't notice I had done that.
fixed
by Tim_H
Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:07 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
Replies: 8
Views: 1767

Re: Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)

PantherX wrote:You mean to say that in the Task Manager, the CPU Usage is ~25% when folding this WU?
Yes, that's exactly what I meant.
by Tim_H
Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:05 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
Replies: 8
Views: 1767

[SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)

I can't get this wu to scale past 2 cores. system specs: Dell Precision M6600 i7-2829QM (hyperthreading and turbo enabled) 16GB ram windows 7 It was started using Arguments: -verbosity 9 -smp 6 -oneunit -verbosity 9. Then it was restarted using Arguments: -verbosity 9 -smp -verbosity 9 with no chang...
by Tim_H
Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:11 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Two identical servers, different performance
Replies: 28
Views: 3962

Re: Two identical servers, different performance

do you have any frame times on the same Project for both machines?
by Tim_H
Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:13 pm
Forum: New Donors start here
Topic: F@H not utilizing cpu fully
Replies: 12
Views: 2732

Re: F@H not utilizing cpu fully

You are having the same problem as the OP, should just need to add the -smp argument\flag and wait for it to finish the current unit. At that time it should start on a SMP unit and utilize all cores