Search found 118 matches
- Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:17 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.65.103.162 assigning same WU twice
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4009
Re: 171.65.103.162 assigning same WU twice
(Run 199, Clone 33, Gen 16) Found it. Both clients connected to send their completed units at the same time, and both failed several times. Original timestamp for client 1: April 4, 2009 [19:03:03] Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps (100%) [19:03:03] Writing final coordinates. [19:03:04] Past main...
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:15 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.65.103.162 assigning same WU twice
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4009
Re: 171.65.103.162 assigning same WU twice
I've had identical work-units, the same P(R,C,G) numbers, on a couple of my computers in the past. It happened when two clients on different machines asked for the same type of work-unit at the same time. I think I got points for both work-units folded as its a slight sever glitch and not a user er...
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:07 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.65.103.162 assigning same WU twice
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4009
171.65.103.162 assigning same WU twice
Hello! One of my machines with multiple Uniprocessor clients fetched the same WU on 2 clients today. Both have been running quite happily for 9 months or more; seperate working directories, unique Machine IDs, etc. Obligatory log snippet. I stopped one client and deleted \work and queue.dat, yet thi...
- Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:17 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 24xx - multiple EUE from pmsfh2008- mod editing now
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1008
Re: Project: 2484 (Run 122, Clone 8, Gen 15) EUE 3% NaN
Please don't spam the forums... if you are having this many errors in such a short time, your computer is definitely unstable. You will need to decrease overclocks/increase voltages and run a stability test to figure out what is causing your crashes.
- Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:09 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Could this be a future for GPU Folding?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 849
Re: Could this be a future for GPU Folding?
This company built a whole new chip specifically for ray-tracing. It's not a programmable GPU like the ones we use for Folding or for gaming.
- Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:35 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: World of Warcraft and folding@home
- Replies: 26
- Views: 6875
Re: World of Warcraft and folding@home
This thread went way off topic in a hurry. How about this spin on it: Since there is no stable/easy/friendly Windows SMP client, (i.e. one that I'd trust the average WoW player with,) and since WoW players are unlikely to own quad-core CPUs when the game only supports 2, assume that this effort woul...
- Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:31 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: World of Warcraft and folding@home
- Replies: 26
- Views: 6875
Re: World of Warcraft and folding@home
Just as an obervation concerning folding and WOW. There is real problem mixing the two, for most people, and that is folding hogging all network bandwidth while the clients are getting new WU's or sending the results back. During those intervals, the folding clients cause the latency of WOW to skyr...
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:49 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: p4436, p4437 missing & performance q
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2298
Re: p4436, p4437 missing & performance q
Upon further consideration, perhaps the larger L2 cache is what gives Core2s such a performance gain on large proteins over the P4 Reference Machine. Being small could mean the gains come solely from IPC enhancements. Bummer. 2483-85 and 5113-5114 are wonderful on Core2s.
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:20 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: p4436, p4437 missing & performance q
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2298
p4436, p4437 missing & performance q
Projects 4436 and 4437 are being assigned with somewhat high frequency to Windows Classic clients, but are not available on the Projects page for utilities such as FahMon. (Gromacs, 225 points like 4438 I would assume.) Also worth noting, these only have 7885 atoms, but produce about 1/3rd the PPD o...
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:27 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Double Gromacs Reduction ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 680
Re: Double Gromacs Reduction ?
For what it's worth, 2484-2496 use the regular Gromacs core, but also get PPD rivaling the SMP client on Core2 chips.
- Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:19 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2492 (Run 99, Clone 25, Gen 0) EUE
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5118
Re: Project: 2492 (Run 99, Clone 25, Gen 0) EUE
I've gotten a lot of LINCS WARNING messages from 2492 and 2496 as well. I'll also send you a PM with a few R/C/G numbers in case this is outside the expected realm of EUEs.
- Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:57 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2484
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4083
Re: Project: 2484
The whole range of projects 2482-2496 use the same FAHCore, and are all 905 points. PPD should be nearly identical.
- Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:29 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: New Anonymous User at Pande Lab team?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3861
Re: New Anonymous User at Pande Lab team?
Very nice. I hope it lasts for a while, and makes frequent reappearances!
- Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:13 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: p2493, p2495 - extreme deadlines?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1472
Re: p2493, p2495 - extreme deadlines?
Yes, of course; a reliable machine will finish these in a week, but every lost WU sets the researcher back 7 months. This seems excessive.
- Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:43 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: p2493, p2495 - extreme deadlines?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1472
p2493, p2495 - extreme deadlines?
2493 171.65.103.160 p2493_system 97147 202.00 303.00 905.00 100 GROMACS Description ppetrone 2495 171.65.103.160 p2495_system 97090 202.00 303.00 905.00 100 GROMACS Description ppetrone I noticed these on the projects summary page today... hoping 202 day deadlines are a typo. You'll die of old age b...